Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • Jun 13 08:02
    @jaspervdm banned @matrixbot
  • May 06 2018 21:29
    User @ignopeverell unbanned @maesitos
  • May 06 2018 00:41
    @ignopeverell banned @maesitos
:Norvegicum.
@norvegicum
ok. cuda miner is now showing! progress!
but not mining. -32000 node is syncing, please wait..
Charles Couillard
@couillardcharles
just switched my miner to cuckaroo29, and I don't find any solution, weird. (2080 rtx)
:Norvegicum.
@norvegicum
orion@orion-TB250-BTC:~$ nvidia-smi
Failed to initialize NVML: Driver/library version mismatch
jaspervdm
@jaspervdm
@couillardcharles what do you mean? not finding cycles at all or not finding 42 cycles?
Charles Couillard
@couillardcharles
with cuckatoo29, I was between 2 and 10 solutions found by minute.
with cuckaroo29, nothing
John Tromp
@tromp
there's no cpu meaner for cuckaroo yet
are you using cuda miner?
jaspervdm
@jaspervdm
he is mining on a gpu
RTX 2080 he said
Charles Couillard
@couillardcharles
yes, with a 2080 rtx
we're still trying to find the block 64000 ;)
John Tromp
@tromp
does solver from my repo work for you?
Charles Couillard
@couillardcharles
let me check
just found the block 64000, but with cuckatoo30 ;)
jaspervdm
@jaspervdm
yea saw that
Antioch Peverell
@antiochp
64002 was "secondary"
John Tromp
@tromp
so was 64004
my grin TUI Mining screen doesn't show latest block on Difficulty panel
jaspervdm
@jaspervdm
yes 64002 was the first cuckaroo one
Ignotus Peverell
@ignopeverell
hurray for 64002 aka 004412fb
Antioch Peverell
@antiochp
@tromp "off by one" there I think on the TUI...
Charles Couillard
@couillardcharles
ok cool, so it's a local probem. Sorry for the inconvenience!
jaspervdm
@jaspervdm
you mean 0134664e @ignopeverell
004412fb is the one for who didnt upgrade their node
Ignotus Peverell
@ignopeverell
mmh was looking at grinscan, you're following the wrong fork there?
John Tromp
@tromp
the real test for HF success will be sync from scratch...
jaspervdm
@jaspervdm
following both
but it just shows the highest diff one, it doesnt validate anything
but if you type in 64002 in the search bar it should show both
Ignotus Peverell
@ignopeverell
I see
jaspervdm
@jaspervdm
it looks like version wasn't changed to 2, is that intentional?
for the first mainnet HF i will make sure to mark the old blocks invalid :)
:Norvegicum.
@norvegicum
i got cpu and cuda showing in miner now! both as device id 0, though...not seem to picking up jobs. waiting for server... any ideas? what am i missing?
Ignotus Peverell
@ignopeverell
block version? typically we update block version when block format changes, not for every consensus rule
jaspervdm
@jaspervdm
ah i see
Antioch Peverell
@antiochp
@jaspervdm we're banning peers for invalid blocks right now
Ignotus Peverell
@ignopeverell
network should partition itself
Antioch Peverell
@antiochp
@tromp - fast syncing a node from scratch right now
John Tromp
@tromp
the damp of 13 on ar_scale means we'll take a long time to get back to 1856
Antioch Peverell
@antiochp
syncing against good and bad peers...
John Tromp
@tromp
the good, the bad, and the ugly
Antioch Peverell
@antiochp
actually one bad peer, with more height and work... so sync is kind of slow...
hopefully ban them soon...
Ignotus Peverell
@ignopeverell
yeah, it'll have to invalidate all others before
Antioch Peverell
@antiochp
header sync with a single "most work peer" is slow
Charles Couillard
@couillardcharles
@tromp the result of your cuckaroo/cuda29 tool with a RTX 2080 : https://pastebin.com/ep24b9P3
Antioch Peverell
@antiochp
oh now its going faster, not totally sure why
John Tromp
@tromp
@couillardcharles thanks