Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
    italokrenak
    @italokrenak
    and I am applying a few enhancements
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    i might suggest leaving lombok out of gwt then if it is going out very soon, and stick to what is known to work
    Daniel Korbel
    @masterdany88
    I use lombok with gwt
    @italokrenak
                <plugin>
                    <groupId>net.ltgt.gwt.maven</groupId>
                    <artifactId>gwt-maven-plugin</artifactId>
                    <version>${gwt-maven-plugin.version}</version>
                    <inherited>false</inherited>
                    <extensions>true</extensions>
                    <configuration>
                        <failOnError>true</failOnError>
                        <sourceLevel>1.8</sourceLevel>
                        <launcherDir>${project.build.directory}/gwt/launcherDir</launcherDir>
                        <moduleName>com.app</moduleName>
                        <moduleShortName>app</moduleShortName>
                        <jvmArgs>
                            <arg>
                                -javaagent:${settings.localRepository}/org/projectlombok/lombok/${lombok.version}/lombok-${lombok.version}.jar=ECJ
                            </arg>
                            <arg>-Xms1024m</arg>
                            <arg>-Xmx4096m</arg>
                        </jvmArgs>
                        <codeserverArgs>
                            <arg>-src</arg>
                            <arg>${project.parent.basedir}/shared/src/main/java</arg>
                        </codeserverArgs>
                    </configuration>
                </plugin>
    codeserverArgs are my project specific
    MCMicS
    @MCMicS

    @italokrenak
    Do you haven a stacktrace or project to look at?

    there is some error with latest lombok versions (for my projects)
    see: projectlombok/lombok#2883

    Maybe it is you error too

    Daniel Korbel
    @masterdany88
    I use one lombok version accross all my modules and it is: 1.18.10
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    We're starting an informal gwt contributors/developers call shortly (though i'm running a little late) - please feel free to join us at meet.google.com/kqf-zczm-zis to talk about gwt, j2cl, or the general ecosystem, someone will add you to the room when they're able
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    jetty+htmlunit upgrade builds available at https://repo.vertispan.com/gwt-snapshot/com/google/gwt/gwt-dev/2.10.0-htmlunit-upgrade-SNAPSHOT/, add https://repo.vertispan.com/gwt-snapshot/ to your repositories and change gwt version to 2.10.0-htmlunit-upgrade-SNAPSHOT if you want to try it out
    4 replies
    i only just deployed it just now, have done all testing inside of gwt itself so far, just starting to test maven now
    2 replies
    Rocco De Angelis
    @rdeangelis83
    Dam that I miss this call. Has this been announced somehow?
    Dmitrii Tikhomirov
    @treblereel
    @rdeangelis83 yeah, it was great a meetup. \
    Or Goshen
    @Oberonc
    hi guys
    in my web.xml file I have a security constraint to force people to use HTTPS
    looks like this:
    <security-constraint>
    <web-resource-collection>
    <web-resource-name>Everything</web-resource-name>
    <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
    </web-resource-collection>
    <user-data-constraint>
    <transport-guarantee>CONFIDENTIAL</transport-guarantee>
    </user-data-constraint>
    </security-constraint>
    when I deploy the war file it all works like peaches
    the problem I have is when I run the server locally using
    mvn jetty:run -pl *-server -am -Denv=dev
    server run normally, but when I try to access it I get
    HTTP ERROR 403 !Secure
    .. naturally since I dont have SSL set on localhost
    what I am forced to do is it comment out the security constant back and forth
    question - is there a way to force the security constant to only aplly to servers other than localhost ?
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    @rdeangelis83 we learned to stop publishing the URL ahead of time after we had random people joining when we did that, but we should at least announce the time. The next one will be in three weeks on 30 sept, starting about the timestamp of my last message. it will also be a bit less informal, trying to drum up support for whereever we are with a potential gwt 2.10 release
    Frank Hossfeld
    @FrankHossfeld
    @niloc132 Mmmh, three weeks should be 07 Oct? Or am I wrong? 😀
    MCMicS
    @MCMicS
    Hi is there any plan to support the latest LTS of java (Java 17) for 2.10?
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    @FrankHossfeld you are of course right, the 7th of october
    @MCMicS gwt 2.9 should already run on lts (i think 2.8.2 will too?)
    @MCMicS if you are asking if the new language features will be added, that won't be possible unless we wait quite a while, we need stable support in JDT for this, and they are still at some level of beta eclipse/eclipse.jdt.ls#1845
    and after that, someone will need to take the time to implement the actual features themselves (and to my knowledge, we don't have language features much past java 11 or so? https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/language/java-language-changes.html lists language features that were added since java 9 if you want to take a look at where something was added
    text blocks for example should be quite easy to add
    switch expressions will be less easy, but i doubt should be too terrible - but someone will need to take the time to work on it
    Ahmad K. Bawaneh
    @vegegoku:matrix.org
    [m]
    As I am checking there isnt many things to be emulated where those you mentioned are good ones ..we also have records, sealed classes, some stream APIs and maybe pattern matching for switch .
    Maybe something like sealed classes is easy as it is infered by the java compiler and the gwt compiler should just ignore it.
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    stream apis are "easier" to implement, just have to change our stream emul - language features we have to change the js (or at least adapt how we read the java ast a bit)
    MCMicS
    @MCMicS
    @niloc132 thanks for answering. Yes I mean add new language features and changes to exisiting (like Predicate.not)
    I also test it the days to use 17 class files to use within app if source level is still 11
    MCMicS
    @MCMicS
    Predicate. Not was introduced in 11 but it is not emulated now
    Miroslav Pokorny
    @mP1
    id be happy to try and do the emulated pattern matching libs, but theres a but it would require the shading that my j2cl-maven-plugin does. Its a lot faster and more accurate to write emulated classes and test them in a regular jvm against the real classes being emulated. But something needs to. happen to make this a standard.
    oedemis
    @oedemis
    Hello folks, I have a strange situation. Iam compiling my gwt-app with gwt-maven-plugin, I have set it up with gwt-style OBF. The problem is I have an index.html file where I setup / import some external Vue Files with Sysmte.js like follwing: <script>System.import('./js/main.js').catch(function (err) { console.error(err); });</script> in main.js the vue component is implemented and I have also an JsInterop with VueGWT(LINK), where i for example make JsInterops like in main.js I have a method hello: function() { .... } and in my VueComponent.java I have public native void hello();. Overall this works in Detailed Modus when I am compiling the gwt app, but in OBF-Modus it says that the functions are not found . Whats the problem actually ?
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    @MCMicS so Predicate.not is just a extra method to add to the emul, we dont need to add new language features for that
    i started work to add some new methods and such a while ago, but it hasnt matter enough to many people to have me continue, so i've worked on other things instead
    @mP1 weren't not talking about pattern matching libraries, but the language features in the new switch-expression syntax - i dont think runtime language support is needed for that?
    @oedemis at a guess, your main.js is calling some gwt function which isnt exported - do you correctly have -generatedJsInteropExports turned on, and is that hello() method marked as a jsmethod?
    Miroslav Pokorny
    @mP1
    @mP1 weren't not talking about pattern matching libraries, but the language features in the new switch-expression syntax - i dont think runtime language support is needed for that?
    Of course there will be runtime support.
    Most of the recent language updates that are not very trivial require lib support.
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    we're both talking about this right? https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/language/switch-expressions.html where it is just a language feature to branch in an expression, like an overblown ternary?
    Miroslav Pokorny
    @mP1
    if theres no lib support the amount of bytecode inserted for each call site will be enormous.
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    right, but none of that is in the jre "jar"
    Miroslav Pokorny
    @mP1
    yes thats the one.