Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    @mP1 weren't not talking about pattern matching libraries, but the language features in the new switch-expression syntax - i dont think runtime language support is needed for that?
    @oedemis at a guess, your main.js is calling some gwt function which isnt exported - do you correctly have -generatedJsInteropExports turned on, and is that hello() method marked as a jsmethod?
    Miroslav Pokorny
    @mP1
    @mP1 weren't not talking about pattern matching libraries, but the language features in the new switch-expression syntax - i dont think runtime language support is needed for that?
    Of course there will be runtime support.
    Most of the recent language updates that are not very trivial require lib support.
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    we're both talking about this right? https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/language/switch-expressions.html where it is just a language feature to branch in an expression, like an overblown ternary?
    Miroslav Pokorny
    @mP1
    if theres no lib support the amount of bytecode inserted for each call site will be enormous.
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    right, but none of that is in the jre "jar"
    Miroslav Pokorny
    @mP1
    yes thats the one.
    of course it will be in the jre jar where else would it go ?
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    its just a helper method, opaque to the real java, so shading/etc is unnecessary
    Miroslav Pokorny
    @mP1
    even something as basic as string concat requires lib support.
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    it would go somewhere like Runtime.java, which isn't a visible class, and is part of gwt itself
    so no shading or repackaging, or even super source
    Miroslav Pokorny
    @mP1
    shading / repackaging is only my requirement and suggestion because it assists unit testing
    the updated switch is just one use case of pattern matching, its all the same
    bb1h
    Rocco De Angelis
    @rdeangelis83

    In the last days I spend some time to think about, how the experience of debugging with the SuperDevMode can be improved.
    I personally don't use source-map and I prefer to debug the JavaScript code in Chrome DevTools. For a better understanding/mapping of the code I use the -XmethodNameDisplayMode
    ABBREVIATED compiler option. The main reason why I don't use source-map to debug the Java code, is because it is not possible to evaluate expressions in the debugger/console/devtool(please correct if this is wrong).
    By using some devtoolsFormatters I personally think that the debug experience is quite okay but it could be better. Some of my colleagues complains that the debug experience (also if it was sometime slow) much better with the old DevMode.
    They prefer to debug the Java-Code and they miss the possibility to evaluate expressions by using source-map.

    In our company we primary use Jetbrains IDEA aus IDE. And by debugging in IDEA the devtoolsFormatters can not be used.
    It would be nice to hear what is your preferred why to debug your GWT code?

    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    i also prefer not to use sourcemaps, but i compile to PRETTY and just use that
    you can use the dev tools eval thing, but you have to guess the right names, since theyve been mangled to prevent java hiding breaking js
    Rocco De Angelis
    @rdeangelis83
    @niloc132 do you use some devtoolsFormatters?
    Colin Alworth
    @niloc132
    no, just raw js
    frankly i dont even use sdm all that often
    depends on what i'm working on though
    Or Goshen
    @Oberonc
    I have a weird behavior with chrome and elemento
    I wrote a class that has "implements IsElement<HTMLElement>"
    inside I have this line:
    .add(button().css("ui", "button", "primary", "fluid")
    .attr("type", "button")
    .on(click, event -> onClickedLogin())
    .textContent("Login"))
    this function (onClickedLogin()) is called when the generated code is run on a Firefox browser, but it isnt called when it is run on an eclipse browser
    how can this be ?
    ie, clicking the button in Firefox works, but not in Chrome
    Justin Hickman
    @jhickman
    I'm assuming 'click' is from EventType.click ?
    Justin Hickman
    @jhickman
    for the most part, doing 'on' is going to addEventListener directly on the element
    try other events and log, such as mouse over, mouse in/out, etc. just to see if it's getting ANY events
    Ahmad K. Bawaneh
    @vegegoku:matrix.org
    [m]
    Are you doing DomGlobal.body.innerHtml=... anywhere in the application?
    Or Goshen
    @Oberonc
    not using elemntal2 directly
    Ahmad K. Bawaneh
    @vegegoku:matrix.org
    [m]
    Still are you doing body.innerHtml?
    Or Goshen
    @Oberonc
    not that I know of (elemento does it indirectly ?)
    btw GWT 2.9.0
    elemento 1.0.3
    no events on that button get triggered
    Ahmad K. Bawaneh
    @vegegoku:matrix.org
    [m]
    No elemento does not
    Or Goshen
    @Oberonc
    no mouseup/mousedown/keypresse
    this is a login window with 2 text inputs
    .on(keypress, event -> GWT.log("keypress")) in the inputs shows nothing in the console as well
    as if no events work in chrome
    or even registered
    Ahmad K. Bawaneh
    @vegegoku:matrix.org
    [m]
    Does the log works outside the event?
    Or Goshen
    @Oberonc
    yes
    I added GWT.log("enter class") in the class constructor where I create the root HTMLElement