gwtproject/gwt

GWT Open Source Project

Frank Hossfeld

@FrankHossfeld

Using both repo urls seams to work. But I had to add both urls - even I do not use RequestFactory (maybe I missed sintering). mvn clean package works. build time drops from 1:52 to 1:38

Frank Hossfeld

@FrankHossfeld

LGTM

Got this warning:

[INFO] 
[INFO] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[INFO] Forking iolani-application-client-common HEAD-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[WARNING] The artifact com.google.gwt:gwt-user:jar:2.10.0 has been relocated to org.gwtproject:gwt-user:jar:2.10.0

:-)

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

yep, as expected - thank you

Frank Hossfeld

@FrankHossfeld

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

i have another test running to be sure it works, then we'll finish this up

MCMicS

@MCMicS

:thumbsup:

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

thank you both @FrankHossfeld @MCMicS i'll ask them to get this shipped - next steps are release notes and javadoc updates for the website, and then finishing migration to github
gwtproject/gwt-site#330 needs a careful read to make sure I got it all
gwtproject/gwt-site#331 needs a quick glance to be sure I didn't do anything dumb
then a change to the mojo gwt-maven-plugin
gwt-maven-plugin/gwt-maven-plugin#167

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

I have created gwtproject/gwt#9756 to track/discuss work on finishing our migrating to github - I have a few action yml files already created as my attempt to replace the unavailable jenkins builds, but welcome feedback on easily managing snapshot releases. my hope had been to use github's own packages tool, but unfortunately you for some reason must authenticate to even read public maven artifacts

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

GWT 2.10.0 is officially here! I'll be merging the release notes soon, and working my way through the checklist to get development to github

Thomas Broyer

@tbroyer

👏

Harald Pehl

@hpehl

🍾

MCMicS

@MCMicS

:confetti_ball:

I can help you with some checklist items

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

thanks - merges are done i think for docs (except maybe a new dtd for 2.10.0?), i'm poking the build now - google apparently deleted the gwt-site-webapp repo rather than leave it read only, so i'm fixing the gwtproject.org build

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

https://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_10_0 looks like i goofed on the styling for the heading of GWT 2.10.0 itself :) but we're up

viego

@viego:legacy-project.de

[m]

I moved our application from 2.8.2 to 2.10.0 and it worked without major problems. Just some simple stuff. Many thanks for the work you guys did.

Stanislav Spiridonov

@foal

:thumbsup:

mamta

@mamta

Many thanks 👏

Frank Hossfeld

@FrankHossfeld

Same here … just updated to 2.10.0 without issues. Great work … :-D

Ricardo Serathiuk

@serathiuk

I moved our software from 2.9.0 to 2.10.0, and it worked very well. We hadn't any issues. Thank you for the great work. :)

radisalzer

@radisalzer

https://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_10_0 looks like i goofed on the styling for the heading of GWT 2.10.0 itself :) but we're up

I made a merge request fixing this ;)

Congrats on the release!!

Everyone involved: Thank you

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

@radisalzer merged, deploying now

radisalzer

@radisalzer

😀 nice. rather pedantic pr though

1 reply

woooo, and it's live ;)

Bogdan Petridean

@bpetridean

I have been fetching gwt 2.10.0 using org.gwtproject groupid for 2 weeks now and it works gr8 :thumbsup:
Since com.google.gwt maven repo is going to be sidelined, why would one not switch to org.gwtproject asap?
10x

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

@bpetridean ideally yes, migrate to org.gwtproject, but publishing both makes it easier to clearly let projects see that com.google.gwt has officially become org.gwtproject. as your dependencies migrate in this way, all references to com.google.gwt will disappear (from the build files anyway), but even if you have one old transitive reference, things will still work

1 reply

future releases will only be org.gwtproject, barring some catastrophe that we missed

Dr. Lofi Dewanto

@lofidewanto_twitter

Yay 🍾🥳🎉

Colin Alworth

@niloc132

we're still waiting for github to un-mirror us from googlesource, then i can proceed with some PRs to update us away from gerrit

Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres

@ibaca

mojohaus gwt-maven-plugin v2.10.0 released :package:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/gwt-maven-plugin/2.10.0/

Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres

@ibaca

curious thing about those stats… did you see the v1.1 16% usage, actually it's even worse because if you see the per-unique-IP stats it's goes up to 32%

1 reply

and apparently the 1.1 usage started on Feb :astonished:

Colin Alworth

@niloc132:delightfullyoffto.pics

[m]

@ibaca: I don’t think we can see the download stats without write access to the groupid? Or did you share the image somewhere (edit: TIL that the images don't show up in the matrix bridge...)