Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Nov 26 2019 22:06
    flip111 commented #6
  • Jun 27 2017 23:38
    jeremyk opened #10
  • Mar 15 2017 23:09
    greenkeeper[bot] labeled #9
  • Mar 15 2017 23:09
    greenkeeper[bot] opened #9
  • Mar 15 2017 23:05
    Travis hhsnopek/pourover (greenkeeper/initial) passed (29)
  • Mar 15 2017 23:04

    greenkeeper[bot] on initial

    chore(package): update dependen… docs(readme): add Greenkeeper b… (compare)

  • Feb 02 2017 22:40
    hhsnopek commented #8
  • Feb 02 2017 22:37
    lauterry opened #8
  • Sep 29 2015 19:10
    hhsnopek commented #5
  • Sep 29 2015 15:56
    nichoth commented #5
  • Sep 29 2015 02:44
    hhsnopek commented #5
  • Sep 28 2015 22:31
    nichoth commented #5
  • Jun 23 2015 13:25
    hhsnopek labeled #7
  • Jun 23 2015 13:25
    hhsnopek labeled #4
  • Jun 23 2015 13:25
    hhsnopek labeled #5
  • Jun 23 2015 13:25
    hhsnopek labeled #6
  • Jun 23 2015 13:22
    hhsnopek commented #7
  • Jun 22 2015 14:18
    hhsnopek commented #7
  • Jun 22 2015 14:11
    mhkeller commented #7
  • Jun 22 2015 13:17
    hhsnopek labeled #7
Henry Snopek
@hhsnopek
@TomNeyland after work I'll push up what I currently have for the rewrite
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
@hhsnopek nice
After going through the pourover code I had a similar thought to #5
so i think we are on the same page
@hhsnopek only tangentially related— have you used crossfilter before?
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
all of those are worth a look
they are share the same conceptual space of supporting advanced interactions with collections of data
Henry Snopek
@hhsnopek
cool
so what I wanted to do was do some benchmarking
like actual benchmarking because the current test implementation is just stupid
I just kept it because it was in the original tests
before I start changing up the methods and functions I want to get separate everything out
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
yeah Im interested in benchmarks as well
Henry Snopek
@hhsnopek
I just pushed up my branch
I want to do something similar to moment.js
well exactly like moment.js, take hold of es6 modules
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
(yay)
i was going to suggest es6 but i know not everyone is onboard the es6 train yet
but yeah thats where the future is and es5 has no sane module management
Henry Snopek
@hhsnopek
yeah so with es6 right now, babel and tracer add a lot of weight
so I don't wanna add any es6 features besides modules yet
see: https://github.com/moment/moment/tree/feature/es6-modules
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
thats a valid consideration, in my expierence its tracur that adds weight, babel rarely does
Henry Snopek
@hhsnopek
I agree, but for of and others start to add small weight that accumulates to be pretty big
especially with the polyfills
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
yeah, generators are particularly bad too
Henry Snopek
@hhsnopek
right now I'm actually working on https://github.com/carrot/share-button
we're using all of es6
and adding the polyfill
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
have you checked out the es6 branch of lodash?
Henry Snopek
@hhsnopek
which I'm starting to regret
I haven't
lemme take a look
YES
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
they have a pretty good decomposition of functionality into individual modules
Henry Snopek
@hhsnopek
that's exactly what I want to do
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
awesome
yeah other than bits that are a bit weird and unnecessary because of technical debt and compatability, the es6 branch of lodash is great
Henry Snopek
@hhsnopek
I really want to keep the browser support that we currently have with pourover as well
its a huge range which I love
also we need to expand the tests
Tom Neyland
@TomNeyland
yes