Of course that wouldn't explain why my BuildInfo behaves the same way... that is not an ADT
@MikkelStorgaard
class SwaggerSpecEndpoint[F[+ _] : Effect](swaggerSpec: Swagger)(implicit F: Monad[F]) extends Http4sDsl[F] {
lazy val response: F[Response[F]] = {
val fOk = Ok.apply(
Json
.mapper()
.writerWithDefaultPrettyPrinter()
.writeValueAsString(swaggerSpec.toJModel)
)
F.map(fOk) { ok =>
ok.copy(headers = ok.headers.put(`Content-Type`(MediaType.application.json)))
}
}
val service: HttpRoutes[F] = HttpRoutes.of[F] {
case _ @GET -> Root / "swagger.json" => response
}
}
object SwaggerSpecEndpoint {
def endpoint[F[+ _] : Effect](swagger: SwaggerSupport[F], swaggerFormats: SwaggerFormats)(
routes: Seq[RhoRoute[F, _]]
): SwaggerSpecEndpoint[F] = {
import swagger._
val swaggerSpec: Swagger = createSwagger(
swaggerFormats,
security = List(SecurityRequirement("JWT", Nil)),
securityDefinitions = Map("JWT" -> ApiKeyAuthDefinition(auth.JWT_AUTH_HEADER, In.HEADER, "JWT".some))
)(routes)
new SwaggerSpecEndpoint[F](swaggerSpec)
}
}
Here’s how I mounted my endpoints
rootServices = Metrics[F](metricsOps)(
GZip(
CORS(authEndpoint.service, corsConfig) <+> snsService.routes <+>
authService.authenticated(authContext.toService(CORS(coreApi, corsConfig))) <+>
swaggerSpecEndpoint.service <+> CORS(home.service, corsConfig) <+> home.noop
)
)
And in AuthService :
val authenticated: AuthMiddleware[F, User] =
AuthMiddleware.withFallThrough(authUser)
with
val authUser: Kleisli[OptionT[F, ?], Request[F], User]
have fun
Hi, I'm new to rho (and http4s) and I'm trying to implement some custom error handling like this:
class Routes[F[+_]: Sync](service: FooService[F]) extends RhoRoutes[F] {
private def handleError(t: Throwable): F[BaseResult[F]] = t match {
case e: CustomError =>
BadGateway(e)
case _ =>
InternalServerError(UnexpectedError)
}
GET / "api" +? param[Int]("id") |>> { id: Int =>
service
.getFoo(id)
.flatMap { foo =>
Ok(foo).widen[BaseResult[F]]
}
.handleErrorWith(handleError)
}
}
I couldn't find a way to make it work without the
widen
and of course, this messes up with the Swagger documentation
do I need some single ADT for all my API response types, including errors I want to encode?
I tried to return something like
InternalServerError(someEmptyFooInstance) but it wouldn't compile either
0.20.0-M2 rho still using swagger 1.6 which don't support deprecation
now I can use foldF on EitherT and it all works
@hygt do you also have code that returns multiple response types and still works ?
in line 39 there is an example of how to return multiple response type
val authUser: Kleisli[IO, Request[IO], Either[String, User]] = Kleisli { req =>
IO(Right(User("Bob", UUID.randomUUID())))
}
val onFailure: AuthedRoutes[String, IO] = Kleisli(req => OptionT.liftF(Forbidden(req.authInfo)))
val middleware = AuthMiddleware(authUser, onFailure)
object Auth extends AuthedContext[IO, User]
object BobRoutes extends RhoRoutes[IO] {
GET +? param("foo", "bar") >>> Auth.auth |>> { (foo: String, user: User) =>
Ok(s"Bob with id ${user.id}, foo $foo")
}
}
val service = middleware.apply(Auth.toService(BobRoutes.toRoutes()))This code is copied from AuthedContext.scala. But the Forbidden part is still "not found" after import bulk of things to make other part of code works... By the way, how to make service available for BlazeServerBuilder, or convert to HttpApp...?
Many thx!
Easily
val jwtStatelessAuthenticator =
JWTAuthenticator.pstateless.inHeader[F, User, HMACSHA256](
signingKey = signingKey,
settings = TSecJWTSettings(JWT_AUTH_HEADER, FiniteDuration(24L * 3600L, TimeUnit.SECONDS), None)
)
val authUser: Kleisli[OptionT[F, ?], Request[F], User] = Kleisli({ req =>
if (userAuthentication) {
jwtStatelessAuthenticator
.extractAndValidate(req)
.map(_.identity)
} else {
OptionT.pure[F](User.dummy)
}
})
private[auth] val defaultNotAuthenticated: AuthedRequest[F, String] => OptionT[F, Response[F]] =
req => OptionT.liftF(Forbidden(req.authInfo))
val onAuthFailure: AuthedRoutes[String, F] = Kleisli(defaultNotAuthenticated)
val authenticated: AuthMiddleware[F, User] =
AuthMiddleware.withFallThrough(authUser)
Should be hitting maven central soon.
Hi, thought I'd ask if I'm going in a wrong direction. Refactoring a class that creates RhoRoutes so that it takes an
F[_] instead of IO. Is RhoRoutes suitable for that? I guess it is, although all the example code / documentation uses IO. The reason I'm asking for is I have a route that returns different status codes based on some intermediate results and it works fine with IO but I can't get it to be of the required F[Result[...]] type with F[_]:ConcurrentEffect, instead it just defaults to Any As far as Intellij's shw implicits feature goes I can't see any difference. My ConcurrentEffect is being picked up instead of ioEffect which seems to be fine.
Yes with the latest Scala 2.12 and Http4s simply returning Ok or BadRequest won’t work anymore
I mean, all over the documentation Ok & etc. are returned. Then again, all the documentation also appears to be using IO which works for me too
@ChristopherDavenport doesn't work, just tried it. Anyway, I'm stuck with divergent implicits (confused myself a bit there, thought there's another error also occurring when trying to do this, but can't reproduce it any more), and for that at least I'm told there is an explanation at http4s/rho#292 ...not of much help since I can't get either of the proposed workarounds working. But at least I know it shouldn't be this way :)
Hello there. Is it possible to get this feature backported to the 0.19.x releases series? We are stuck using the 0.20.x Http4s series right now, and we're trying to build some functionality that depends on the content-type headers:
Happy to open a PR against a branch if one is opened for me.
If someone could help me out with a branch in the origin upstream, that would be helpful
@zarthross is this something you can help me out with? We're using Rho internally but this is kind of a roadblock for us. We want to have a route support multiple content-types (e.g. json and proto), and we want to use the content-type header to control that. The Swagger document will unfortunately not work properly for this use case without that backport.
We are using 0.19.x because our team is still supporting Scala 2.11 at this time (and that cannot be changed until other vendor changes are completed).
Hello, I updated ther dependencies in my project,
cats-core = 2.1.1
cats-effect = 2.1.2
rho-swagger = 0.20.0
http4s-blaze-server = 0.21.0
now, I have a problem in start the project, the error is
Could not find an instance of Applicative for [x]F[x]
[error] server <- BlazeServerBuilder[F]
[error] ^Any suggestions to solve this error?, The code is this
import cats.effect.{ConcurrentEffect, ContextShift, ExitCode, IO, IOApp, Resource, Timer}
import co.yyyy.xxxxAPI
import org.http4s.server.Server
import org.http4s.server.blaze.BlazeServerBuilder
object Main extends IOApp {
def run(args: List[String]): IO[ExitCode] =
AppServer.create.use(_ => IO.never).as(ExitCode.Success)
}
object AppServerSwagger {
def create[F[+_]: ConcurrentEffect: ContextShift: Timer]: Resource[F, Server[F]] =
for {
server <- BlazeServerBuilder[F]
.withHttpApp(xxxxAPI[F].httpApi)
.bindLocal(8085)
.resource
} yield server
}Any error message
[error] found : cats.effect.Resource[[x]F[x],Nothing]
[error] required: cats.effect.Resource[F,org.http4s.server.Server[F]]
[error] config <- Resource.liftF(parser.decodePathF[F, DefaultConfig]("app"))
[error] ^
@etspaceman I'm open to a PR of the backport, here is a branch you can PR against: https://github.com/http4s/rho/tree/v0.19. I'll keep a lookout for your PR.