I guess it would be great to have someone else looking at it, because it is a massive one.
yes this would be super nice. If anyone here @/all is interested into making a review as well, that would be great !
So we will write two specs (one on scaphandre/virtiofs integration, one allowing to stop CPUs (unused)) regarding this topic for the next PTG (October). Then the implementation should go on the AA release cycle. (Note: I'm the owner of the first one and I will probably do the nova implementation.)
This is awesome. I'd love to help with the first one then, tell me what you'd need. On the second one, did you see this ?
And to finish, I looked at #176, that's interesting. Maybe it could be used to add integration tests. To my mind this is something becoming a priority as with new functionalities it will become harder and harder to change the code without regression.
#176 is definitely interesting, I'll have a look at it and see how we could use it in the CI tests, just after release 0.6.
I also had a look at mockall in order to mock sensors and so create exporter tests to ensure changes will not break them. The mockall create looks powerful and that looks possible to do it. But I might need help to better understand how to mock sensors.
This sound interesting as well. I'll happily review any suggestion. I also 100% agree on the need of integration tests and even maybe some e2e tests (better than the drafts I've made in #148
Through Boavizta, we are trying to reinforce international collaboration on ICT environmental impacts evaluation tools methods and data.
We initiated a mailing list where we can debate related topics, announce talks to be performed to the members of the mailing list (next one is in september), issues that could be discussed collectively to better understand and address this complex field.
If you'd like to join, could tell me by DM and send me the email address to be used for your subscription ?
send me the email address to be used for your subscription ?
Hi, subscription is only to the mailing list?
...0:0is empty, and the other only contains a file with a 0 in it. I'm guessing there is supposed to be more. If i mount it in the VM and run with
scaphandre --vmafter mounting it. I get the following error:
if you are running on a VM, do not forget to use --VM parameter invoking scaphandre at the command line, src/sensors/mod.rs:263:18.
cat /var/scaphandre/intel-rapl\:0/energy_ujshows a 0 and
/var/scaphandre. The VM I'm using gets 6 cores but the mounted topology only has 1 core. Resulting in the error message I'm seeing.
Hi @all !
The SDIA is organizing 3 events/hackathons/ideathons around evaluation of ICT environmental impacts, based on open-source tools (including scaphandre !).
Those events could be accessed either in person or remotely, for free :
I'll be there this friday at AMS and remotely in Berlin. If some of you could and want to join it would be a great occasion to meet !
Hi @/all !
For those of you who are interested in having energy consumption evaluations in another context than physical machines running on x86, ie in the cloud, in VMs when you don't manage the hypervisor, etc... Some of you may have seen the hubblo-org/scaphandre#25 that talks about having a collaborative database with power consumption profiles per hardware. This project is taking the direction of a collaborative project managed by Boavizta : Energizta !
Documentation is WIP, but if you are interested in contributing, please tell me ! I'll send you the information to participate in the contributors meeting ! (spoiler alert, many amazing contributors onboard already, including researchers specialized in such topics !)
I see in the requirements :
A matrix server supporting the Application Services API is needed. No attempt has been made to track the minimum supported API version, but it should work with any reasonably modern server. It is assumed to be synapse in this document."
Is synapse a "public server" ? (warning, matrix-newbie around the corner ;) )