Uh the only way I know how to link is with: #ipfs:matrix.org
But I don't know what that looks like on your end.
go-ipfs Github, and the Matrix/IRC room AFAIK.
##nfthash = p['Hash']
print(p)
return render(request, 'nftdetails.html', {'NFTdesc': desc, 'NFTname': name})
const block = Block.encoder({ "this": "is an object" }, "dag-cbor");
const data = block.encode();
const cid = await block.cid();
await ipfs.block.put(data, { cid: cid.toString() });
...
const block = await ipfs.block.get(cid.toString());
const data = new TextDecoder().decode(block.data); // Decoding with the default format of utf-8 leads to results that can't be parsed with JSON.parse
ipfs shutdownHey Everyone,
I am facing some major issues while setting up a private ipfs network on a bunch or raspberry pis,
No matter what I try, the peer table is empty.
An urgent help would be appreciated!
There seems to be a problem with running ipfs packages with other node js packages. In particular, any ipfs package (ipfs-core, ipfs-http-api) is throwing the following error:
Error [ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED]: No "exports" main defined in /path/to/project/core/node_modules/ipfs-core/package.jsonI found a discussion about a possible solution on github https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs/issues/4125#issuecomment-1146754121 but changing the "module" from "commonjs" to "esnext" opens up a bunch of other problems (in particular, I'm trying to run this within Hardhat and the Hardhat devs have stated there is no ES support on their short term roadmap.
There must be a way to get Hardhat and IPFS to work together but I've hit a roadblock and am unsure how to solve. Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this problem.
Hi. What is the best practice for publishing IPNS content from more than one IPFS node? I want to have redundancy so that if one node fails, other can do it. It seems that the only way is to export/import keys manually. there is a API call for export/import keys but it seems not to work. Is there a way to programmatically create/share keys ?
ipfs/kubo#4240 : "If you'd like to implement ipfs key import/export, go ahead. We'll just have to restrict export to only running on the local node and not over the API"
Why not over the API?