By the way, in the end I still omitted the "card result" (https://github.com/jarun/googler/blob/master/googler#L317-L319) because sometimes it is duplicated (Wikipedia result could be duplicated, for instance), plus the fact that it doesn't have an abstract.
Did you test for any regressions? I already did randomized tests, but given that Google doesn't serve the same thing to everyone, we might still need more testing.
okies
Did you test for any regressions?
I will in the coming weekend.
too busy with office due to an ongoing release :)
OK leave it...
in regular browser
wanted to check something
figured it out anyway
The last time I heard,
googler works fine on it.
after i add proxy ,i got an error "Connection blocked due to unusual activity",and the debug info 302 redirect,the url:https://ipv4.google.com/sorry/IndexRedirect?continue=https://www.google.com/search%3Fie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26start%3D0%26q%3Dgoogle&q=CGMSBGuyw4IYoKiQugUiGQDxp4NLjMYOA5jMIDjcqZO5bqA2JBKFeBk
does that mean my proxy was blocked by google
def google_get(conn, url):
"""Send a GET request to Google with the appropriate headers.
url can be relative (to the appropriate Google domain).
"""
global ua
conn.set_tunnel("www.google.com")
conn.request("GET", url, None, {
"Accept-encoding": "gzip",
"User-Agent": ua,
"Cookie":cookie,
"Accept":accept,
"Accept-Encoding":acceptencoding,
"Accept-Language":acceptlanguage,
"Cache-Control":cachecontrol,
"Connection":connection,
"Host":host,
"Upgrade-Insecure-Requests":UpgradeInsecureRequests,
})
return conn.getresponse()def new_connection(domain=None):
"""Returns a new connection to the given domain with appropriate options.
When the given domain is absent, the global variable server is used instead.
"""
global server
#return http.client.HTTPSConnection(domain if domain else server, timeout=45)
return http.client.HTTPSConnection("proxy_host",proxy_port)
Just a FYI: Google is experimenting with pure JavaScript rendering. Here's the source I just got: https://gist.github.com/fc8535bfab1a4319bf7c7de37d062a30. And here's what it looks like:
and for more, search
w3m in https://www.afpy.org/doc/python/3.2/library/webbrowser.html
@Sasikanth3 In principle you should be able to do
BROWSER=w3m googler query and it should work when you open URLs inside googler, but in reality, we currently have trouble integrating with text-based browsers due to stdin and stdout redirected to /dev/null in https://github.com/jarun/googler/blob/dfc988f16c7e17bb691b3ef4e154f17ae5436588/googler#L93-L109. See jarun/googler#125. Rest assured, it's not a hard technical problem; we just need to figure out the most user-friendly solution after some discussion. A temporary workaround can be found in jarun/googler#125 too; see "Temporary workaround".
@Sasikanth3 Text-based browser integration has been restored in the master branch. See the new FAQ: https://github.com/jarun/googler#faq
@jarun What about enabling daily/weekly Travis builds in case Google introduces breaking changes? New Travis feature: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2016-12-06-the-crons-are-here https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/cron-jobs/ You can schedule builds on https://travis-ci.org/jarun/googler/settings. (For some reason the feature doesn't work for me and I have emailed support.)
I changed it to "do not run if there has been a build in the last 24 hrs"
@jarun I'm looking at googler's GitHub topics: google-news, google-search, google-site-search, google-terminal and googler-at. googler is the sole project in the last three, and IMO they don't make good topics (topics are for discoverability, they are not really short summaries of the project's capabilities). What about removing the last three (well, maybe google-site-search can be kept, it's a more neutral one), and add "google" to the mix?
"command-line" could be a good, relevant topic too.