Discussion of Lagom project development: https://github.com/lagom/.github/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md | Use lagom/lagom channel for general discussion. | Code of Conduct: https://www.lightbend.com/conduct | Forums: https://discuss.lagomframework.com | Commercial support from https://www.lightbend.com/
Will talk to @mliarakos in case he isn't on gitter often. :)
that’s why I would prefer it to be a side project
Understood. Some of the changes could likely be ported upstream, but don't quote me on that
The abstractions might be useful for Lagom even outside of this context (e.g., not relying so heavily on a wsClient from play)
@ihostage, we are running short in time because right now. We have Play / Lagom major releases that we want to finalize and next week we have company meeting. Can we post pone it to after next week?
@renatocaval I think — yes :smile: Moreover, if you do several actions that I described on our discussion on the forum, in the future Play Core Team not need to spend time for release Play SOAP. I can do that myself as maintainer. :wink: