@/all Ping.
@Firedrake969 Pong.
@Liam4 Ping.
@Firedrake969 Ponyg
@/all By ping I mean a literal ping. Now y'all pls feed ideas <3
A decent automation library
Like Microsoft Flow except as an API
Proper, non-callback async (es2016) fixes this tho :D
64 bytes from @arinerron (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.051 ms64 bytes from @arinerron (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.055 ms
Why are there two grammar.js, one in the parent directory with messed up indentation and one in src/ with fixed indentation?
URL?
@kvackkvack
brb
:P
Thanks
:P
Uhh... That's really odd
@liam4 pls explain
@kvackkvack @Arinerron That was an old file; I've destroyed & pushed it away.
Makes sense. :P
Is the recursive join thing the only way to match more than one of something in nearley?
Liam would know :package:
idek
:P
So you can't escape string characters, right?
Yay thanks for destroying that.
Must have accidentally
nearleyc'd manually once :P
Is the recursive join thing the only way to match more than one of something in nearley?
Looking back on that code it just flattens out a list of lists (each list having the form [data, list] or [data], i.e.
[1, [2, [3, [4, [5]]]] -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
So you can't escape string characters, right?
Nope, not yet! :P
Like Microsoft Flow except as an API
googles microsoft flow
Ohh, that looks cool
I'll have to experiment with it. Looks like it could be used for pretty handy stuff :P
Yeah, I got the recursive join thing after that. :P Do you have any idea of how you'd implement escaping strings?
Copy JavaScript? :DDDD
How do they do it?
hm
Would just adding \" to be allowed in SingleStringValidCharacter and making the end a lazy RegExp " match work?
i.e
"{1}?
Maybe make a string interpreter
;)
Then we can haz template strings too
String interpreter?
Oui
wat is dat
Code that runs through a string
Looking for stuff
e.g. backslashes
Right, but how would you match the string in the first place then? :P
What?
Oh yeah.
xD
lol
Hmmmmmm
It seems like my idea should work though. :P
Few lines down there's strings
:)
I'm not sure I understand that code :P
Lol
@liam4 might ∆∆∆∆
Oh, wait, I think I do.
:P
So... Could we just copy that?
Probably.
I'm working on a JS-like programming language that compiles to .sb2 and learning (stealing) from the grammar here, which is why I'm asking. :P
xD
Why compile to stretch
Also what!?
Because it's hard and I'll probably learn some from it.
Why the "what!?"?
You don't compile from a good language to a crap one that does nothing m8
:P
It's not meant to actually be used in real programs.
(Anyhoo, Tosh is cool)
Makes sense
But it'll be fun to do. And to work-around returning functions and all that
Although, why not just help with tulun
Like moi
Meh. :P
Then I'll have to learn the entire codebase of it
Not really. It's pretty simple :)
...to learn
xD
I guess I should probably implement arrays.
Oh do arrays already work?
tests
speaking of tests
they're all broken? :P
oh yeah
I need to fix that.
Fixed tests, woo
Using a generator because I'm too lazy to babelify
tests.js :P
Hoi
Hey
Liam just move tests.js into dist
;)
// This code is automatically generated. Changes will be overwritten.
/* doesn't actually get overwritten */
/* such defeats the purpose of dist */
What?
Built files go to dist.
Oh.
I see what you mean
I guess I could do that.
;p
You mean move it to src and use async/await right?
Oh, yeah.
xD
Okay :P
Btw I probably broke stuff with my merges
So, like, have a look-see :shipit:
ALEX WHY DID YOU BREAK THINGS
...huh?
The only thing I saw break were the tests
which I fixed btw.
o:cake: make
...
Stupid Gitter mobile
Who likes Travis CI?
I don't. It spams me </3
...aw
With what?
jk it's nice
What is it?
my email
:P
Automagic testing
Get Hound for pull requests too? Tulun should have fancy ci stuff
particularly also on different versions of Node
Also pls open Travis to me too?
HoundCI eslints for us
pls tell how
I never travies b4 :(
https://houndci.com/ me neither lol
Use Hound too pls
It comments on pull requests
implement that
better than the current string system
Mm
I found it :package:
indeed.
Shouldn't
unevaluated be a keyword?
nearleyc grammar.ne is giving me an error about not being able to parse '"'
Hm, nvm. I must've accidentally changed something. :P
:P
nearley debugging is hard :(
Mm
Anyhoo, what does unevaluated mean in Tulun?
I still don't get it
Like it sounds cool but
:(
Z
If you pass x > 3 to a function, it will automatically be evaluated and it will never change during the process of this function - even if the boolean's not actually true anymore.
...wat?
Ah.
So unevaluated means the variable may change?
Yeah.
Right
Thanks :)
That has since fancy uses
*some
:P
Yeah.
I haz an idea I might try out in a branch on monday; optional/default params built-in
@liam4 can you help me with my nearley grammar pls? :P
Like, square bracket = optional
ew, why square bracket? :P
(req, [res]) {}
oh
That's how the docs do it.
:P
I thought you meant something like (req, [] res) {}
:P
xD
Also if the caller ommits an argument that's not optional it throws an error.
Sound fancy?
:smile:
Yeah. :P
rip @liam4 come back pls
Ooh, maybe also [foo='default] too?
Like, default arguments
Sounds nice.
@liam4 don't implement this; I wanna try, k? :P
This message was deleted
This message was deleted
MegaApuTurkUltra This message was not deleted
:OOO
lol
Shouldn't unevaluated be a keyword?
Yes.
nearley debugging is hard :(
Yes, yes, yes.
lol
@liam4 don't implement this; I wanna try, k? :P
Good luck! It's a great feature.
Maybe later on I'll implement
...rest arguments.
Ooo
How do I prevent ambiguity in nearley?
Magic
I see.
Well, the most common case of Ambiguity I've had is whitespace [possibly] beside whitespace.
Make sure that can't happen.
"ambiguity" formal idk
Mine seems to parse "5.86" as both "5", "5.8" and "5.86" lol
mate
Magicians code
:P
At least I've gotten strings to work now...
liam4/tlnccuwagnf@36e14e4 :tada: String escapes!