ah, I see it. I'm really curious if it's a thing, to pin a comment. I upvoted yours so it's the top one now
it is called "distinguish"
that is unintuitive
ah, thanks. well, I guess that's another few closed issues.. :)
Wait, I just noticed that windows cross-compiling is already fully working
I somehow completely missed that
Great job threadpanic
At least last time I checked. I could spend a few hours today to see if the wine64 executable still crashes under docker.
And it has massively improved my speed on creating a msix for the microsoft store
Oh, wow.. you can build it under docker, and
wine64 doesn't crash :) Am I happy to have just installed arch, I got to try that too
well, so far no joy tbh.. :/ But it doesn't crash on wine64 anymore but on something else, so that's a win probably
hi folks, i've been playing with openai api's for a few days, and what seems feasible for us is to create a 'librewolf-openai-integration' patch. this one will have us LW know the api key (stored in pref or something) and for any selected text in a web page, have the popup menu add a menu item 'query with openai', which would do just that in a new tab... what do you guys think?
sounds like something better suited for an independent extension, I'd think?
(with not having thought more than 5 second about it – I'll do some more thinking later? ;)
(with not having thought more than 5 second about it – I'll do some more thinking later? ;)
I really don't know much about how Firefox works on the inside, I just build it.. If it's possible as an extension that's always better, yes.
Another idea was to add a menu item 'open profile' that displays the available profiles, and when selected opens a new window with that profile (like how it works in about:profiles).
good evening folks! I was asked about a small interview about LibreWolf, but as we don't have a real lead dev and I don't want to be mistakenly identified as it, I just asked the person to join this room and ask whatever they want to know about the project.
I thought I'd share, just in case you get asked questions in this room. I honestly didn't feel comfortable either going on record or speaking in name of all of us so I "refused" and sent an invite link.
I know we are losing visibility this way but I like the project being seen as a collective effort. let me know if you agree on the move, and if one of you wants to give the interview we could always discuss it and arrange it.
I mean, not that having a lead dev would take away the community aspect, I just don't feel like I'm the lead dev nor I want to be seen as one. let's say we have a core of devs lulz 😄
3 replies
sure. no prob. people talking about librewolf is people talking about web browser privacy and security. I'm all for it :o)
But, I would say they could also sample our main channel and reddit. do you still post to Lemmy?
I plan to keep posting tho
I remember my short presence there being a big fiasco ^.^
1 reply
mac builds which I still hate btw eheh
(the big librefox mess – that's quite a fitting description btw. ^^)
I wonder how many prefs were removed in the process, I was keeping track of it at some point but I can't remember
1 reply
ugh, there were too many comments in the mix to give a precise result
1 reply
I was going to write a python script that checks how many lines in the file start with either
pref(", defaultPref(" or lockPref(" lol
1 reply
your solution sounds a lot cleaner but I have a soft spot for python because, well.. I just feel comfortable using it
went with:
def count():
with open("librewolf.cfg") as config_file:
prefs = 0
lines = config_file.readlines()
for line in lines:
if (
''.join(line[0:5]) == "pref(" or
''.join(line[0:12]) == "defaultPref(" or
''.join(line[0:9]) == "lockPref("
):
prefs+=1
print(prefs)it says we have 195 prefs in our config file
it was 820 prefs before the revamp
among others I added a faq entry about DDG and and the great firewall of china --> https://gitlab.com/librewolf-community/website/-/merge_requests/62/diffs#816ee6d8556db82e9c7d3bfb4c915c5bbb564412_559_610
I avoided getting into the weeds and just went straight to the point with that we have been mentioning in issues for a bit. however I'm not sure if I should be more detailed, so I'm asking here :-)
Looks good to me - as you said, keeping it on point. More details there would probably invite waaay more complaints/discussions than this was l way ^^
I agree. Btw, arch is a delight except for needing an aur kernel module for zfs
Yeah, that's a bit annoying if you can't boot and need to a live ISO.. /o\
I need to manually patch that aur thing too. But it's ok because if I ever switch to bsd, I have zfs there
1 reply
I have one 4 tb hdd for mass storage (zfs) and one system disk, ssd1tb, that has seen several distros by now 😊
I need the patch because it's not recognizing the right kernel version when building