eg. HTTP URI (with fragments) to any thing.
The problem with metadata generation, as I understand it, is that it's usually something that an article's authors are wholly uninterested in, and thus requires additional labour. The problem of missing fine-grained metadata is probably mostly an incentive problem, I'd guess? (Though it's not exactly clear to me what incentives lead to the current addition of metadata - probably funder requirements?)
When authors are forced to use LaTeX/Word or whatever.. it is not like they can easily or at all assign a global identifier (which can eventually resolve) for arbitrary things.
As I understand it, authors are mostly limited in the formats they can use by the upload systems. Then publishers pay people to transfer that into JATS-XML so they can add proper metadata and such. I don't think authors would ever be prepared to directly submit JATS-XML (I wouldn't).
In the thread you linked, Stefan does ask an important question: how to proceed? And the answer to that question needs to involve the publishers, unfortunately - at least for projects like mine to be able to move away from DOIs. And a replacement for ORCID has its own additional challenges, I'm afraid
You mean: why can't they just email their manuscripts in a format they prefer?
No, that's not what I mean.. but I don't think I understand your question.
Hmm, my question was because I didn't understand yours :P
Will your system let me use my WebID or acknowledge peer-reviewed work on my personal website?
Once researchers are no longer forced to submit to the legacy publishers
@Vinnl_gitlab Check out https://linkedresearch.org/cloud .. where anyone can announce a unit of scholarly communication that's on the Web to its Inbox.
csarven @csarven still needs to improve the graph view :S
I like
We can talk about federation and distribution when we get there. If you have ideas on how to "decentralise" and do all this better, voice yourself and roll up your sleeves.
That's my approach too
One thing that we can do is to require an archive snapshot of the subject/object/target that's mentioned in the notification, as well as creating a archive snapshots of the notifications.
May have already discussed that in the chat.. can't remember now.
If I did it right, my thesis has 479 unique references. based on
<cite><a>s.. not all <a>s. I don't distinguish between 'footnotes' and 'endnotes' or whatever. Hyperlinks all the way down :) That number might change a bit once I sweep through.
@essepuntato Is
cito:citesAsSourceDocument similar to prov:wasDerivedFrom?
@/all Published Linked Research on the Decentralised Web: https://csarven.ca/linked-research-decentralised-web . All feedback most welcome.
{
"cito:citesAsAuthority": 250
"cito:citesAsDataSource": 12
"cito:citesAsEvidence": 126
"cito:citesAsPotentialSolution": 3
"cito:citesAsRelated": 17
"cito:citesAsSourceDocument": 6
"cito:citesForInformation": 126
"cito:credits": 1
"cito:discusses": 84
"cito:extends": 1
"cito:hasReplyFrom": 1
"cito:includesQuotationFrom": 54
"cito:obtainsBackgroundFrom": 43
"cito:parodies": 1
"cito:replies": 1
"cito:repliesTo": 1
"cito:reviews": 1
"cito:usesConclusionsFrom": 20
"cito:usesMethodIn": 3
}
... if I did it right.
hi folks. I am presently working on a project to create "SmartFigures", a .zip container for research figures and its metadata (in xml format, mainly authors, title, caption and links to data and other metadata), together with https://sourcedata.embo.org/. The idea is to make it portable since all is included in a single zip file (using the .dar format publishers are using). It was designed as a centralised system so far, and I am wondering how to make it decentralised/if we can make it decentralised (each person owning its own gallery, sharing some SmartFigures with the lab; and the lab being able to share it with a lab consortium, until it is published and shared with everyone). Anyone has time to discuss this, or point to similar projects maybe?
PS: https://linkedresearch.org/resources does not find anything
@jcolomb sounds a bit like James Littlejohn's work on decentralised science. Maybe with a chat with him to see where that project is ATM https://github.com/aboynejames
@jcolomb also check out what we have done with RO-Crate https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.0, Research Objects works great with external resources as well by URL, or minId/ARK using Big Data Bagit (BDBag) https://github.com/fair-research/bdbag/