<link href="https://dokie.li/media/css/iospress.css" media="all" rel="stylesheet alternate" title="IOSPress" />
(or rel="stylesheet"
if it is intended to be default)
@tkuhn I'm not sure if a change is needed for your article, but I sense that when it talks about dokieli, there is emphasis on publishing articles in/around Scholarly HTML, like strictly for marking and publishing articles. Also, while the following is true:
The RDFa that is generated automatically under the hood by Dokieli represents, apart from the metadata, just the narrative text paragraphs in RDF literals.
it leaves out other ways in which data can be included (eg Embed Data feature) or referred to (eg notifications and annotations), so that the affordances it puts in place can be used towards broader use. Scholarly HTML draft or potential implementations of it doesn't even touch those things. So, I think dokieli qualifies for the other criteria you have in Table 1.
https://essepuntato.github.io/papers/rash-peerj2016.html
into URL field -> Open.