A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras.
It isn't an usual syntax that you use in everyday job, but still good to know
hello, I am new in lodash so i don't know how to use with react native. I have a question. I have a project which is related to firebase. I want to see the information of which user logs in.With the map function, I can access all the data in the database but I only want to see the data of the logged-in user.should I use the find function to achieve this?Do you have a suggestion?
const mapStateToProps=state=>{
const currentUser=firebase.auth().currentUser;
const email=currentUser.email;
const profileInformationList=_.map(state.profileInformationList,(val,uid)=>{
return {...val,uid}
});
return {
profileInformationList
}
}
const currentUser=firebase.auth().currentUser;
const email=currentUser.email;
const profileInformationList=_.map(state.profileInformationList,(val,uid)=>{
return {...val,uid}
});
return {
profileInformationList
}
}
I want to use currentUser.email
I can pull all the data with the map function, but it gets confused when I use the find function.
Does it compare using ===, or date1.getTime() === date2.getTime(), or some other way?
Reason I ask is because in my code, I am debugging, I am seeing that the two date objects I am comparing using _.isEqual is returning false even though the .getTime() for both dates are the same
is https://github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/4.12.0/lodash.js#L454 correct place where I need to fix #2238?
Hello, I'm working on a port of Lodash for the latest version of GameMaker which now supports functions as a first class citizen and structs (which emulates JS Objects). I was wondering if someone know who I should contact to determine what is permissible as far as naming and licensing, as this is derived from the Lodash API. There's some features that've been omitted as they don't make sense in GML. Additionally, none of Lodash's codebase has been utilized, it's purely the API definitions.
Hello (first timer here), I'm working on a super simple doc PR but I noticed that builds are somewhat broken. I believe i'm missing a step because there are no lib/ folders and the issue in build is searching for a module that would be located there:
> lodash@5.0.0 doc /Users/dsiah/OSS/lodash
> node lib/main/build-doc github && npm run test:doc
internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:979
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module '/Users/dsiah/OSS/lodash/lib/main/build-doc'
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:976:15)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:859:27)
at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (internal/modules/run_main.js:71:12)
at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:47 {
code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND',
requireStack: []
}
lodash 4.17.15 is exposed to sonatype-2019-0467 vulnerability. Could you please check this and provide fix
var users = [
{ user: 'barney', age: 36, active: true },
{ user: 'fred', age: 40, active: false },
{ user: 'travis', age: 37, active: true},
{ user: 'david', age: 40, active: false },
{ user: 'tom', age: 37, active: true}
];
result = _.groupBy(users, 'age');
Hi there,
I have this two arrays:
var coordinateClienti = [
[12.7592267, 43.0696255],
[12.7037126, 42.9575853],
[12.5263973, 43.105579],
[12.7803655, 43.2322369],
[12.4302894, 43.0265033],
[12.1659394, 43.5551518],
[12.5471666, 42.6143734],
[12.7860033, 43.2321763],
[12.3263852, 43.3081323],
[12.7020796, 42.9564996],
[12.191765, 43.5116042],
[12.649205, 42.5624235]
]
var steps = [
[12.402996209906489, 43.1070321],
[12.7037126, 42.9575853],
[12.7020796, 42.9564996],
[12.649205, 42.5624235],
[12.5471666, 42.6143734],
[12.402996209906489, 43.1070321],
]there is a lodash function that compare this two arrays and return me true if some array element of one are contained in the other?
thanks
{type: "start", location: Array(2), load: Array(1), arrival: 1590066680, duration: 0, …}
1: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 10, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
2: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 9, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
3: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 7, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
4: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 3, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
5: {type: "end", location: Array(2), load: Array(1), arrival: 1590080738, duration: 12378, …}
6: {type: "start", location: Array(2), load: Array(1), arrival: 1590066680, duration: 0, …}
7: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 0, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
8: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 5, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
9: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 4, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
10: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 2, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
11: {type: "end", location: Array(2), load: Array(1), arrival: 1590076873, duration: 8513, …}
12: {type: "start", location: Array(2), load: Array(1), arrival: 1590066680, duration: 0, …}
13: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 1, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
14: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 11, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
15: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 8, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
16: {type: "job", location: Array(2), job: 6, service: 420, waiting_time: 0, …}
17: {type: "end", location: Array(2), load: Array(1), arrival: 1590080203, duration: 11843, …}
i am looking for the solution to fix the lodash vulranability
Hi folks! Just wanted to draw peoples attention to lodash/lodash#4759
This is the PR to fix the vulnerability previously reported by snyk and sonatype, and now also published by npm. Are there any maintainers here who could jump back into this PR?
This is the PR to fix the vulnerability previously reported by snyk and sonatype, and now also published by npm. Are there any maintainers here who could jump back into this PR?
1 reply