by

Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Jun 16 15:53
    nikhilrana015 closed #116
  • Jun 16 15:53
    nikhilrana015 commented #116
  • Jun 16 11:20
    luispedro commented #116
  • Jun 14 16:54
    nikhilrana015 opened #116
  • Jun 14 16:41
    SujoyKG commented #112
  • Jun 14 13:30
    SujoyKG commented #112
  • Jun 14 13:27
    SujoyKG commented #112
  • Jun 14 09:00
    coveralls commented #112
  • Jun 14 08:43
    SujoyKG synchronize #112
  • Jun 13 18:01
    SujoyKG synchronize #112
  • Jun 13 16:25
    SujoyKG synchronize #112
  • Jun 13 10:54
    SujoyKG commented #112
  • Jun 13 09:00
    SujoyKG commented #112
  • Jun 13 08:38
    SujoyKG synchronize #112
  • Jun 13 06:36
    SujoyKG closed #111
  • Jun 13 05:09
    SujoyKG commented #112
  • Jun 13 04:46
    SujoyKG commented #112
  • Jun 13 03:29
    SujoyKG commented #112
  • Jun 13 03:17
    SujoyKG commented #111
  • Jun 13 02:59
    SujoyKG synchronize #111
Daniel Haehn
@haehn
hi everybody, I encounter strange behavior with labeled.relabel: not all regions get unique labels. some regions with the same label are not connected after. did anybody observe this?
it is a dense label image with no background
mahotas 1.3.0+git
Luis Pedro Coelho
@luispedro
(First of all, I'm surprised that notifications didn't notify me of your message before)
If this is the case in your input labeled image, then it is the expected behaviour
It may be a case where the documentation needs to be improved, though
What relabel does is just renumber your regions so that it goes from 0...N without skipping any. It does not perform connected components.
for that you can probably do mh.label(labeled != 0)