Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    zoq on Freenode Looking at the PR, I don't think it will go stale any time soon.
    jonpsy Understood
    jonpsy thanks
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    shrit I think it would be nice if GitHub makes a difference between closed pull requests and merged one, resulting in three tabs, open, closed, merged
    shrit Anyone has thought about this before?
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    zoq on Freenode shrit: Haven't really thought about it, but not sure I can see what benefit that would provide?
    shrit This will filter a pull request that is merged from all other pull requests that have been closed for any other reason. I can see two benefits, first they do not have the same status, closed != merged. Second, this will allow easily to look through the pull requests that have been closed for no activity or for any other reason.
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    shrit Especially, if you have a high frequency pull requests.
    shrit In addition, it is good for statistics, ration of closed vs merged.
    shrit * In addition, it is good for statistics, ratio of closed vs merged.
    zoq on Freenode You can click on the "stale" label to get a list of all stale issues (for GitHub PR's are issues as well).
    zoq on Freenode You can run thoses statistics already, I think there is no way to automate this if done right, because there are all sorts of reasons why a PR was closed and not merged.
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    shrit Yeah, I see, they focus more on good filtering in two tabs, rather than several tabs
    zoq on Freenode I also like to get some more statistics, that's one reason why I created a project board, to keep track of issues I looked at.
    shrit Good point, I did not thought about that
    shrit You can filter the PR that you have already participated in?
    shrit * Can you filter the PR that you have already participated in?
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    shrit or look at?
    zoq on Freenode Hopefully, I have the data, so at some point I can write a script to run some statistics.
    shrit BTW, did you try GitHub CLI?
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    shrit * btw, did you try GitHub CLI?
    zoq on Freenode No, maybe I should?
    shrit Actually I am not a fan of browsers in general, therefore I am always look for alternative to stay on comand line
    shrit I gave it a try but it seems to be not very easy,
    shrit It requires time to master syntax, therefore, I stopped, maybe I should continue
    zoq on Freenode Maybe, I like the GitHub review interface, it's simple so I mainly use it.
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    shrit It is true, they do have a great interface for reviewing, I hope that one day they port it to terminal
    zoq on Freenode I use vimium, so I don't have to use mouse, so I can mainly use the same navigation I use in vim, which is bascially my terminal.
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    shrit This one is great, thanks, you have resolved all my life issues related to mouse
    shrit I always thought I have to change the browser or something since there exist other browsers with vim bindings by default.
    zoq on Freenode It's not perfect, but in most cases it works.
    Aakash kaushik
    @Aakash-kaushik
    Hey everyone do we have any plans to integrate the models repo into mlpack itself ?
    medias661
    @medias661
    sounds like a good plan.
    Hello Everyone. I just wanna ask about the detail of the SAC implemented in mlpack (sac.hpp and sac_impl.hpp). I recently spotted the resemblance more with TD3 instead of SAC itself, so I just wanna know If I got it wrong when reading the code or something else maybe?
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    zoq on Freenode Aakash kaushik (Gitter): No, the idea is that the models repo can pull in arbitrary dependencies like opencv.
    matrixbot
    @matrixbot
    rcurtin (@ryan:ratml.org) alright, the Gitter team asked me to unlink the gitter channel from the Matrix room, so I'm going to do that... hopefully they set up the link quickly
    rcurtin (@ryan:ratml.org) (I'll try to keep an eye on the gitter room while the rooms aren't linked)
    Aakash kaushik
    @Aakash-kaushik
    @zoq that does makes sense but the models repo doesn't even has a install path configured like mlpack and i don't think has package releases like mlpack even if it is kept seperate.
    Any specific reasons for that ?
    jonpsy
    @jonpsy:matrix.org
    [m]
    hey
    have you guys planned on extending armadillo functionality? rcurtin zoq do you recall our discussion on arma::transform? So, I posted it on gitlab. I wanted to know your thoughts on this, do you guys think this is a diserable extension? More generally, do you guys plan on extending arma functionalities, if yes, is this a good addition?
    rcurtin
    @ryan:ratml.org
    [m]
    awesome, the gitter bridge is working again :)
    Aakash kaushik (Gitter): the last message you sent was sent when the bridge wasn't working; do you want to send it again now that the bridge is up?
    Aakash kaushik
    @Aakash-kaushik
    Hi @rcurtin sure.
    @zoq that does makes sense but the models repo doesn't even has a install path configured like mlpack and i don't think has package releases like mlpack even if it is kept seperate.
    Any specific reasons for that ?
    Thanks @rcurtin for the gitter bridge thing.
    zoq
    @freenode_zoq:matrix.org
    [m]
    @Aakash-kaushik: Lack of time, it should have everything you said.
    Aakash kaushik
    @Aakash-kaushik
    I might be able to help with that, i have fixed couple of things in the catch2 PR on that repo if we can review that so i can work forward. That will be really helpful :D
    zoq
    @freenode_zoq:matrix.org
    [m]
    @Aakash-kaushik: Just left a comment on the PR, about the failing test.
    Aakash kaushik
    @Aakash-kaushik
    thanks for that, I will keep the conversation there.