Hello,I'm a PhD student working on cosimulation of electrical systems.
I found the FMU very interesting to meet my expectations.
However, I have a few questions:
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Hello @ABD16
Yes, see e.g. https://bitbucket.org/simulage/daccosim/wiki/Home or https://github.com/NTNU-IHB/FMU-proxy
(This is a chat for the developers of the FMI standard; please use Stackoverflow with tag "FMI" for questions on the usage of FMI in the future. In case of further questions, plesae answer there)
Best regards, Christian
Is this a clear Tool issue oder are there discussion about a standard approach / best practice?
@GallLeo : Currently there is no standard recommendation.
My colleagues mainly use fmpy or hand-crafted scripts to re-compile source code FMUs
Some tools can create multi-platformform FMUs
There was an effert by the INTO-CPS to provide a web-service for that purpos https://github.com/INTO-CPS-Association/fmu-builder , but I think it never really got operational or worked reliably.
Currently I do not see a standard approach, but we could add it to the FMI3 implementers guide: https://github.com/modelica/fmi-standard/issues/1029#issuecomment-834447076
hi, the INTO-CPS fmu builder has not been update for some time. I will try and see if we have some resources available. We are using docker images to cross-compile stuff, i.e. https://github.com/dockcross/dockcross
Hi @CThuleHansen : that would be very good! Thanks! Will you also extend this for FMI3? With the new buildconfiguration compiling source code FMUs shouldbecome much better.