Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
    Irina Zacharias
    @IZacharias
    Tickets to discuss in our small group: 1000, 1005, 915
    MBlesken
    @MBlesken
    I will join as well. @andreas-junghanns please let me know when you are starting your PR introduction. Then I would like to switch. Thanks.
    Cláudio Gomes
    @clagms
    @MBlesken the PR demo is starting
    MBlesken
    @MBlesken
    @clagms ... in the main meeting? ... or which meeting?
    Cláudio Gomes
    @clagms
    main meeting
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    In the main meeting the discussion on event stuff with Hans Olsson has started
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    @clagms , @IZacharias , @MBlesken : regarding the Sync meeting: we do not have to have it now, we are also continuing.
    Just rejoin the Webex when you want to sync
    Irina Zacharias
    @IZacharias
    @chrbertsch We do not need a Sync meeting at the moment. Still discussing clock issues.
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    @IZacharias : as you look into #1000 now, you can trigger me if you have questions for understanding
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    We will re-convene in the plenung at 14:00 instead of 13:00
    Pierre R. Mai
    @pmai
    Sorry, have to but out until 15:00 likely due to new scheduling conflict...
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    Restarting the plenum in the Webex now
    Cláudio Gomes
    @clagms
    my notes on the synch meeting: https://github.com/modelica/fmi-design/blob/master/Meetings/2020-06-17_18-Online-FMI-Design-Meeting/synch_meeting_minutes.md
    thank you for all the input!
    leaving now, take care!
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    FYI: Martin Otter will join tomorrow morning and be available to discuss the issue regarding clock activation and event iteration
    Cláudio Gomes
    @clagms
    Nice thank you!
    Cláudio Gomes
    @clagms
    Please joint the clocks working group meeting here:
    https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19:meeting_MTI1ZjQxNmEtOWQ0ZC00ZDU2LWFiYmUtNGM5NDFhYmIyNzAz@thread.v2/0?context={"Tid":"61fd1d36-fecb-47ca-b7d7-d0df0370a198","Oid":"88ad1fd7-93d7-440b-80bb-a69b506dfa88"}
    Otto Tronarp
    @otronarp
    I might join later when the version discussion is over.
    Cláudio Gomes
    @clagms
    thank you @otronarp
    @MBlesken are you joining?
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    @clagms : I understood from @IZacharias that @MBlesken will not join today.
    Cláudio Gomes
    @clagms
    ahh ok! Thank you!
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    Sync Meeting will be at 14:00 instead of 13:00 to enable a lunch break before
    Christian Schulze
    @CSchulzeTLK
    https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_NTM3YWQxNTktMjE5My00ZWNiLWE3MzktMWM4ZmNhMjY0NGI5%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f43d2abe-9aa6-4da3-8a54-0a94a14fb731%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22fc08cc10-6359-4eb6-a744-12f721dfa423%22%7d
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    This is for work on #1068
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    Continuing in Webex now
    ABD16
    @ABD16

    Hello,I'm a PhD student working on cosimulation of electrical systems.
    I found the FMU very interesting to meet my expectations.
    However, I have a few questions:

    1. In the field of electrical engineering, we have a lot of software that does not currently integrate the FMI standard. How can we do it in this case?
    2. Can this standard take into account a simulation with a variable time step for the export of an FMU?
    3. Can we make a distributed simulation?
      Thank you very much.

    Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch

    Hello @ABD16

    1. Which tools are you using? E.g. Saber, MATLAB/Simulink, ... have FMI support. Do you nee import/exoport of FMUs? Best talk with your tool vendor and request FMI support!
    2. Yes, for Model Exchange FMUs and internally for Co-Simulation FMUs

    3. Yes, see e.g. https://bitbucket.org/simulage/daccosim/wiki/Home or https://github.com/NTNU-IHB/FMU-proxy

      (This is a chat for the developers of the FMI standard; please use Stackoverflow with tag "FMI" for questions on the usage of FMI in the future. In case of further questions, plesae answer there)
      Best regards, Christian

    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    Hello FMI Designers, we use this channel to chat during the FMI Design Meeting
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    @andreas-junghanns : Could you please share the link to the Teams meeting for the Discrete States subgroup please?
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    Break until 16:10
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    Webex started
    ClementBaillarguet
    @ClementBaillarguet
    Hello,
    I'd like to know if FMU 2.0 support enumerated types and if so where can I find documentation about it?
    Thank you
    Torsten Sommer
    @t-sommer
    FMI 2.0 has an Enumeration type (see https://svn.modelica.org/fmi/branches/public/specifications/v2.0/FMI_for_ModelExchange_and_CoSimulation_v2.0.pdf, p. 53)
    ClementBaillarguet
    @ClementBaillarguet
    Thank you
    Leo Gall
    @GallLeo
    Hi FMI specialists, is there a standard recommendation how to build multi-platform FMUs (one FMU working on Windows and Linux)? We currently Source FMUs and FMPy to recompile. Is this a clear Tool issue oder are there discussion about a standard approach / best practice?
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch

    Is this a clear Tool issue oder are there discussion about a standard approach / best practice?

    @GallLeo : Currently there is no standard recommendation.
    My colleagues mainly use fmpy or hand-crafted scripts to re-compile source code FMUs
    Some tools can create multi-platformform FMUs
    There was an effert by the INTO-CPS to provide a web-service for that purpos https://github.com/INTO-CPS-Association/fmu-builder , but I think it never really got operational or worked reliably.
    Currently I do not see a standard approach, but we could add it to the FMI3 implementers guide: https://github.com/modelica/fmi-standard/issues/1029#issuecomment-834447076

    Lennart Ochel
    @lochel
    @GallLeo @chrbertsch It is very easy to create multi-platform FMUs with OpenModelica (using docker). Simply use the buildModelFMU command and specify the desired platforms as a list in the argument. Ping us on OpenModelica if you want more information.
    Casper Thule
    @CThuleHansen
    hi, the INTO-CPS fmu builder has not been update for some time. I will try and see if we have some resources available. We are using docker images to cross-compile stuff, i.e. https://github.com/dockcross/dockcross
    @GallLeo @chrbertsch
    Leo Gall
    @GallLeo
    Thank you for the info!
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch

    hi, the INTO-CPS fmu builder has not been update for some time. I will try and see if we have some resources available. We are using docker images to cross-compile stuff, i.e. https://github.com/dockcross/dockcross

    Hi @CThuleHansen : that would be very good! Thanks! Will you also extend this for FMI3? With the new buildconfiguration compiling source code FMUs shouldbecome much better.

    Yallappa Kudachi
    @YKUDACH
    Hello, FMI Standard Team, Can anyone assist for below issues
    1. How to Use FMUSDK by Qtronics combined with Cmake ?
    2. Not able to run SDK install.bat file with visual studio 2015, Any other additional tools required?
      Thankyou in advance
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    Hello @YKUDACH : This gitter is used for communication in the FMI standard developement.
    @YKUDACH : for tool-specific questions please contact the FMUSDK developers or use StackOverflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/fmi
    Yallappa Kudachi
    @YKUDACH
    @christian Thankyou
    nkub flow
    @nkflow_gitlab
    Hello experts. I have been trying to figure out answer to this question and if this is not the place to ask it let me know. Lets say we have a FMU which is getting inputs from Python and simulating at an interval of 0.001s. Does the FMI/FMU standard allow us to run the FMU multiple times for a same input (so Python provides the input at 0.01s interval and the FMU simulates that 10 times at each step)? Would that be faster since we have reduced the communication interface by 1/10th ?
    Christian Bertsch
    @chrbertsch
    Hello @nkflow_gitlab : this is a chat for the developers of the FMI standard.
    Please ask your question on StackOverflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/fmi