You can log in with your Github account tho
can you see it when you're logged in?
yes, can see it after log in
any chance to also build a pdf version?
Should we really handle modelica/fmi-standard#502 or just close as invalid?
Travis is now disabled for modelica/fmi-standard. CI runs in < 1 min w/ CircleCI :-)
I wonder if modelica/fmi-standard#505 is an issue for the xc repo and additionally an enhancement for the FMU Compliance Checker.
Hi. I have been looking at this issue: modelica/fmi-standard#116. is there any way to follow the progress of the hybrid co-simulation group?
@CThuleHansen Do you have access to FMI-design on github? (Aarhus university has signed the CCLA). You can have a look a the working group folder. Additionally, please contact the working group leader, Andreas Pillekeit from dSpace. Do you have his email? Otherwise I will send it to you
There was not any (public) update on https://github.com/svn2github/FMILibrary recently.
But AFAIK, the https://github.com/modelica-tools/FMUComplianceChecker will be updated to FMI 3.0 already during the FMI 3.0 development process, which somehow means, also the FMILibrary requires to get updated.
But AFAIK, the https://github.com/modelica-tools/FMUComplianceChecker will be updated to FMI 3.0 already during the FMI 3.0 development process, which somehow means, also the FMILibrary requires to get updated.
Experimental support for FMI 3.0 is already available for FMPy: https://github.com/CATIA-Systems/FMPy/tree/feature/fmi3
Torsten, thanks for the info. I also notice that FMPy has GUI support which PyFMI does not. However, more importantly i could not find connections for co-simulation coupling in FMPy. Seems like FMpy is in early stage of development with limited features, but mentioning it on the downloads page of the standard is misleading especially if you are new to adopting the standard.
@rahulsetia, as an industrial user I do not agree with your conclusion. I consider fmpy especially well-suited for people of the standard (due to the simple, open-source implementation). Regarding coupled co-simulation FMUs, please have a look at https://github.com/CATIA-Systems/FMPy/tree/master/fmpy/ssp/examples using the coming SSP standard to describe the coupling.
I am currently using FMI2 to simulate an FMU in vs2015, when I want to call the fmi2CallbackLogger function, it said that a const char* type augment Component environment cannot be used to initialize callbackloger. But according to the specification, it should be fine to do the initialization using Null or a specific component environment. Anyone can help me with that?
When I try to initialize an fmu, I found an error of the resource location.
In Specification, it said that the location should be wrote like file:///C:/temp/MyFMU/resources. But in the fmusdk source, it is like file://C:\QTronic\sales. When I try to use these two methods in vs2015, the first indicated an error LNK2019 while the second method indicated error LNK1120. Is there anyone can help me?
@zb2865493, please open an issue on https://github.com/qtronic/fmusdk/issues. This chat is for topics related to the FMI standard (not its implementations).
@zb2865493 ... or use Stackoverflow (tagged with FMI) https://www.google.com/search?q=StackOverflow+FMI&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b to ask the question.
To everyone taking part in the Steering Committee meeting today: please take a look at the agenda, especially the PRs: https://github.com/modelica/fmi-design/tree/master/Meetings/2019-07-10-FMI-Steering
- What's a common use-case for FMI/FMU? Could it be for example if I want to run a simulation to evaluate a new design for a robot? Or does it also have a use for when I operate the robot?
- Is there a server side component that I need to be aware of?
- From software development, I'm familiar with things like Docker image registry and NPM which can be used to share libraries or other programs. Is there anything like that for sharing FMU models?
- I assume simulations can be computationally intensive operations. Can I have a client on my laptop and run the simulation on a server/cluster elsewhere?
Your question seems more related to simulation tools than FMI itself. Maybe you should start with picking a tool / library (e.g from https://fmi-standard.org/tools/). Most tools come with examples that showcase their capabilities.
@lindhe : Adding to Torstens's reply: FMI then comes into play when you want to exchange, co-simulate or deploy simulations models between different tools and simulations platforms.
The Prostep Smart Systems Engneering project has published a simple video on the benefit of FMI: https://youtu.be/A-3iIot0fO8.
Basic FMI papers/slides: FMI 1.0: The Functional Mock-up Interface for Tool independent Exchange of Simulation Models (Slides: PDF, PPT)https://svn.modelica.org/fmi/branches/public/docs/Modelica2011/The_Functional_Mockup_Interface.pdf , https://svn.modelica.org/fmi/branches/public/docs/Modelica2011/The_Functional_Mockup_Interface_paper.pdf
FMI 2.0: https://svn.modelica.org/fmi/branches/public/docs/Modelica2012/ecp12076173_BlochwitzOtter.pdf
A Tutorial can be found here: Gensim Workshop on Modelica and FMI https://github.com/ibpsa/project1/wiki/2016-10-24-gensim-agenda
@t-sommer I agree for the discussions on the FMI standard (because these discussions are then also documented).
But I think as a chat medium for either organizational topics or for short technical questions that are "below the level of sending an email to fmi-design" it could be benefial
But I think as a chat medium for either organizational topics or for short technical questions that are "below the level of sending an email to fmi-design" it could be benefial