Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • 00:01
    jeremyd2019 commented #9091
  • Sep 20 23:03
    jeremyd2019 commented #9091
  • Sep 20 21:44
    jeremyd2019 commented #9091
  • Sep 20 21:21
    jeremyd2019 commented #9091
  • Sep 20 20:33

    Biswa96 on master

    pulseaudio: Add package (compare)

  • Sep 20 20:33
    Biswa96 closed #9628
  • Sep 20 20:31

    lazka on master

    cmake: update to 3.21.3 Merge pull request #9630 from M… (compare)

  • Sep 20 20:31
    lazka closed #9630
  • Sep 20 20:09
    jeremyd2019 commented #9091
  • Sep 20 20:04
    1480c1 commented #9631
  • Sep 20 20:01
    MehdiChinoune ready_for_review #9630
  • Sep 20 20:00
    jeremyd2019 commented #9091
  • Sep 20 20:00
    1480c1 commented #9628
  • Sep 20 19:47

    github-actions[bot] on master

    Cygwin: allow open_setup to fai… Cygwin: fhandler_pipe::open_set… Cygwin: make callers of open_se… and 1 more (compare)

  • Sep 20 19:29
    lovettchris closed #9603
  • Sep 20 19:29
    lovettchris commented #9603
  • Sep 20 19:28
    jeremyd2019 commented #9091
  • Sep 20 19:04
    lazka transferred #2645
  • Sep 20 19:04
    BillKek opened #9631
  • Sep 20 18:46
    BillKek opened #2645
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
it should work if you create a branch or PR though
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
seems like github provides a "${{ github.event.before }}" reference for the previous push
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
@mingwandroid note that distutils is getting removed from python, so things are about to change -> PEP 632
Ray Donnelly
@mingwandroid
OK. I think few used distutils directly, usually done via setuptools .. so most will not care; yeah, we will have to care!
This leads nowhere: "(1, 2) Porting from Distutils ( https://setuptools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/distutils-legacy.html )" unfortunately.
Astrum-polaris
@Astrum-polaris
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
yeah, setuptools should be fine, after we patch it to support MSYS2 like distutils
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
I need to make generate-srcinfo retry.. git crashes too often
Ray Donnelly
@mingwandroid
Is it time to consider moving to mingw-w64 git?
I run with Johannes' repo having precedence usually so that is the git I run by and large.
or just provide both and let the user pick? make them conflict?
David Macek
@elieux
Moving away would be hard regarding dependencies.
Providing both seems okay.
No conflicts please.
Ray Donnelly
@mingwandroid
Another discussion time?
Алексей
@Alexpux
@lazka hey
how are rebuilds work for updated packages?
Im update isl in msys repo
and then need rebuild gcc with updated package
but as I see it use old ISL
not newly builded
Biswapriyo Nath
@Biswa96
One random thought. If pacman and bash were compiled natively for Win32 platform do we need msys2 layer at all?
Алексей
@Alexpux
@Biswa96 I think you cannot do it properly
at least bash
Christopher Degawa
@1480c1
I don't think that would be possible since I think pacman and bash would rely on unix-like paths
somewhere in the chain
Алексей
@Alexpux
problem not only in paths
you need most UNIX utilities also porting
most of them use UNIX fork and interprocess communication
Biswapriyo Nath
@Biswa96
Can bash be replaced with busybox which has a win32 port? Also porting != follow everything. fork can be CreateProcess.
Алексей
@Alexpux
@Biswa96 no
Biswapriyo Nath
@Biswa96
Another query. Do you manually edit the autoconf/m4 files for msys2 platform i.e. msysize.patch?
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
but the build fails
I guess the so version bump breaks the existing gcc
I don't know how to solve that. How was this done before?
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
should we move isl to a static lib first? like with mingw
Алексей
@Alexpux
well yes before i locally copying old isl library to be able rebuild gcc
yeah seems we need build it static only
Алексей
@Alexpux
but it not so easy
we also need build static mpfr,mpc,gmp
lets then not update isl now for msys
as it need rebuild many things
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
+1
Алексей
@Alexpux
will revert isl update
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
ok, we can also build them locally with hacks if needed
but I'd prefer the revert if there is nothing important in the update
Алексей
@Alexpux
with local hack wi just need rebuild gcc and cross-mingw-w64-gcc with new isl
while switching isl to static only lead to switch mpfr,mpc,gmp to static only
Christoph Reiter
@lazka
yeah