Continuous Auditing & Configuration - please speak english and be nice ;)
People
Repo info
Activity
ishackigozi
@ishackigozi
I can provide the exact setup if required
Elenui
@Elenui
@Elenui: I'm sure you're not. We have an upgrade not about related subject in 7.0 if it may help
Finally found the issue between two thing. the configuration load my certificate then another defaut certificate. including this : IncludeOptional /opt/rudder/etc/rudder-apache-*-ssl.conf
If I comment the defaut certificate
I get this from my node : curl: (90) SSL: public key does not match pinned public key!
but my webui load the right certificate :'(
I know someone had the issue (google told me) but gitter doesn't show me the message XD
anyway the note help me @fanf42:matrix.org thanks again :)
Nicolas Charles
@ncharles
@Elenui@ishackigozi you have exactly the same issue
Hey guys. I'm just decommissioning a few servers that are running rudder 2.10 (yes, really). I'm trying to remember what the file to create to disable the agent is but I'm pulling a blank. I thought it was something like /opt/rudder/etc/agent-disable or disable-agent or something like that, but the agent still seems to be enforcing policies... Any ideas?
create a custom domain for my node's communication
ishackigozi
@ishackigozi
@Elenui I tried to follow this but am not sure if I am doing something wrong
Vulcan1171
@Vulcan1171
Hello! Sorry, think this is not the correct place to write this, but I can't find any place where to report the issue so maybe someone can point me in the right direction... The problem is this: in the official rudder repositories, the "latest" link still points to the 6.2 version while 7.0 is out. Does anyone know how I can alert normation about this? Many thanks!
@Vulcan1171: yep, we are waiting for 7.0.2, there are still some nasty bug in 7.0.1 in specific cases
Vulcan1171
@Vulcan1171
Thank you, I was unsure because it is not an issue regarding rudder per-se. Very well, since the situation is known, I will wait for everything to stabilize.
if you need, you can of course already use ../7.0/... url
Nicolas E
@necar_gitlab
Hello. How can I manually make a node run its rudder-hooks and inform the hub? (rudder agent inventory doesn't seem to do it)
Nicolas Charles
@ncharles
Is the hook executable ?
does it returns valid json ?
Nicolas E
@necar_gitlab
yes it is
Nicolas Charles
@ncharles
you can run manually the inventory with /opt/rudder//bin/run-inventory --debug --local=/tmp/inv.ocs and check the content of the inventory for tag CUSTOM_PROPERTIES
in /tmp/inv.ocs
Nicolas E
@necar_gitlab
@ncharles OK, this does work, and I can see that what's in the CUSTOM_PROPERTIES is current with what I expected. But is there a way to manually (force) this result to be sent to the hub? I mean, I know that every night this very action is done correctly, but how to manually trigger it on demand?
Nicolas Charles
@ncharles
HA !
rudder agent inventory
Nicolas E
@necar_gitlab
OK, thanks. I thought that when running inventory manually, the results were not routed to the hub. I thought that because some dynamic groups are based on properties, and I have to manually refresh them to see the group content change.
Nicolas Charles
@ncharles
Dynamic groups are always refreshed when new inventory arrive, or also every 5 minutes, just to check
Alexis Mousset
@amousset
:information_source: Rudder is not impacted by the spring4shell vulnerability (CVE-2022-22965)
Matthew Frost
@mattronix
Should the Condition for OS match on Techniques do this: Skipping method 'File from HTTP server' with key parameter '/opt/uptic/software/zabbix/zabbix-release_5.0-1+focal_all.deb' since condition 'ubuntu_20_4.(directory_presentopt_uptic_software_zabbixok)' is not reached was not applicable
show as ubuntu_20_4
?
as i cant seem to get this condition to trigger for ubuntu 20.04 and all i see is via the dropdown ubuntu major 20, minor. 4
but cant add 20 04 as the minor
Fdall
@Fdall
@mattronix Your best bet is to run rudder agent info -v on your ubuntu node, and look for the most precise system condition defined. Still, ubuntu_20_4 looks correct
Matthew Frost
@mattronix
gotcha
cant figure out whats blocking my run
oh wow
did not know those exist condtion wise
thats cool
looks like a bug indeed as look ubuntu 20_04 is listed