These are chat archives for openworm/ChannelWorm

15th
Jun 2015
Milad Jafary
@miladjafary
Jun 15 2015 03:16
@travs @VahidGh I think the second one Vahid approaches is better for implementing. Because we can use that wrapper any where and also we can use it in other project as an API. @travs I think the adaptor pattern is good . but think about a simple class that just delegated an PyOW instance on it and define some method for interaction with that is better and simple. What do think?
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Jun 15 2015 09:54
@miladjafary, @travs, Also the Django router could be another possible solution.
Milad Jafary
@miladjafary
Jun 15 2015 12:25
@VahidGh it's good used as a wrapper. I think again using of it needs to override django model.because we need understandable DB engine for django that our case is PyOW and have not understandable django model.
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Jun 15 2015 14:58
@miladjafary, yeah, I should say in addition to the previous approach...
But for handling two databases we finally need to use something like this router, unless we use one DB for both purposes and then export some specific data to the PyOW DB.
Stephen Larson
@slarson
Jun 15 2015 18:14
@VahidGh hey do you happen to be around?
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Jun 15 2015 19:18
@slarson, Hello
Stephen Larson
@slarson
Jun 15 2015 19:19
Hi there
Hey @travs and I are working on milestones
we are being rather bold and establishing completion criterion for each milestone and improving the labels and descriptions for each
I wanted to get your feedback on what we are doing
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Jun 15 2015 19:21
Yeah, I was reading new issues...
Stephen Larson
@slarson
Jun 15 2015 19:27
@VahidGh what is your vision for the next steps on the Web app?
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Jun 15 2015 19:28
The first thing we need is to have a complete prototype of the pipeline.
Stephen Larson
@slarson
Jun 15 2015 19:28
OK, prior to implementing them as UI functions in the web app?
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Jun 15 2015 19:29
A user should be able to enter data, digitize plots (I- and/or V- Clamp, I/V for now)
Then cwfitter will start the optimization
And the final result will be shown
Stephen Larson
@slarson
Jun 15 2015 19:30
do you also envision validation happening via the app?
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Jun 15 2015 19:31
I've considered this in the cwfitter, but depends on which level of validation you mean
At the first place we need to define some measurements to constraint final results by some means
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Jun 15 2015 19:37
I've not yet defined these constrains, it's usually empirical, so we need more time, and curated models to be able to do this automatically
@slarson, what do you think about this?
@travs, Why 7? :)
Travis Jacobs
@travs
Jun 15 2015 19:43
Lucky number seven! :)
We just wanted some number haha, this one seemed prime
Stephen Larson
@slarson
Jun 15 2015 19:44
Yes that’s good — we’ve got some issues now on the topic of defining what “close enough” of a fit should mean I believe
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Jun 15 2015 19:59
@travs, good number :) 4 K channels, 2 Slo channels, and one egl-19 maybe!
@slarson, #63, and #75 are in a high priority. after finishing this we can say we have the first version of the pipeline .
Stephen Larson
@slarson
Jun 15 2015 20:12
Great :)
Joe Bowen
@joebowen
Jun 15 2015 23:04
So looking at the Channel Worm stuff on openshift, I'm not sure how to handle this.
We can revert back to what I had and change a few directory names, but the directory structure was current to openshift and is gonna be deep no matter how we name it.
Joe Bowen
@joebowen
Jun 15 2015 23:23
Spoke too soon. Looks like I can get rid of the wsgi folder.