These are chat archives for openworm/ChannelWorm

11th
Aug 2015
Travis Jacobs
@travs
Aug 11 2015 14:10
@stripathy I opened #158 to address what you were talking about at the hackathon. Also, #98 exists. I'm not sure that those two cover everything you had to say, however. If there's anything I missed please raise a new issue, or let me know and I can raise one.
Travis Jacobs
@travs
Aug 11 2015 14:43
@VahidGh I've raised #158, but this question is a little different: where should one add data points on a figure like this one ?
Since there are no original data points included in the figure
Travis Jacobs
@travs
Aug 11 2015 15:11
@VahidGh I've added the above question to this comment, so you can ignore it here if you want
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Aug 11 2015 15:40
@travs, I left my comment under #158.
Let me know if this is still not clear.
Travis Jacobs
@travs
Aug 11 2015 17:48
@VahidGh Yeah that makes sense, just seems arbitrary, but I guess that's the nature of this type of digitization without actual data points.
@VahidGh When I look a the series for number 4 over here, I am confused. Is there a reason all of these lines go under one dataset? Or is this tracking just one line?
Vahid Ghayoomie
@VahidGh
Aug 11 2015 18:59
@travs, This one was digitized using the automatic feature of the digitizer, which saves all the points in one dataset.
This is also possible using cwFitter, but is not as accurate as when we separate datasets for each trace.
Travis Jacobs
@travs
Aug 11 2015 19:17
@VahidGh Ok cool, thanks