These are chat archives for orbitjs/orbit.js

17th
Jun 2016
Mitch Lloyd
@mitchlloyd
Jun 17 2016 00:53
Ok, looking into this more... this is quite a bit more complex then what I'm making it, but I still feel like this could be an improvement. Will probably have to dig in to see how it goes.
Dan Gebhardt
@dgeb
Jun 17 2016 19:43
@mitchlloyd I finished up support for replaceRecord ops in the operation processors via #326
@mitchlloyd also, I think I see what you're getting at re: the transaction / store relationship
originally, Transaction was basically an observer of a Store - used to collect transforms applied
I rather like the store.fork() API, but we should consider how to best integrate the forked store with the concept of transform tracking