Discussion of Play project development: https://github.com/playframework/.github/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md | Use playframework/playframework channel for general discussion. | Code of Conduct: https://www.lightbend.com/conduct | Forums: https://discuss.playframework.com | Commercial support from https://www.lightbend.com/
@mkurz : Thanks very much. In that case it would be good to have this information in the documentation.
It might be there already, but it certainly isn't on the page that describes how to build the documentation - and I hazard a guess (famous last words !!) - that is likely not in all places that compiling XXX from source code is mentioned. I am happy to raise an issue and make a PR for the documentation changes I can find.
It might be there already, but it certainly isn't on the page that describes how to build the documentation - and I hazard a guess (famous last words !!) - that is likely not in all places that compiling XXX from source code is mentioned. I am happy to raise an issue and make a PR for the documentation changes I can find.
First RC is slated for the end of the year, but there will be many milestone builds prior to that; would be great to be able to start porting existing Scala 2/Play projects at that time.
Hi there how do I contribute an example application?
I have created a play application that uses “just” JDBC - no Slick / doobie and also has nested classes to deal with.
https://github.com/gavinbaumanis/play-scala-jdbc
I have created a play application that uses “just” JDBC - no Slick / doobie and also has nested classes to deal with.
https://github.com/gavinbaumanis/play-scala-jdbc
11 replies
@gavinbaumanis playframework master is already on 2.6.4, but I think that will become play 2.9, for which we don't have release plans yet at this point AFAIK
anyone feel like a quick review? playframework/scalatestplus-play#253 :)
how do we version scalatestplus-play? should https://github.com/playframework/scalatestplus-play/compare/5.0.0...master be 5.0.1, 5.1.0 or 6.0.0?
5.0. 1 for patch but fixes, not the case here
5.1.0 for releases containing breaking changes
I think that's the case this time considering the fact that there are mima exclusions in the diff
5.1.0 then?
in the past, we use to open a new branch each time we had a new major release
that's why there is a 5.0.x branch
this time, I think we can keep going with
master
until the point we need to make a
5.1.x branch
since is a project with low change rate, I think we can pretty much stay on
master. Until the next breaking change coming from ScalaTest
or Play, but there is nothing schedule in Play that could potentially break it, so we are pretty much safe
Anyone here able to tackle any of these:
- CI is Broken: gradle/playframework#136
- Gralde Plugin support for Play2.7,
gradle/playframework#92 - Gradle Plugin support for Play2.8
gradle/playframework#133
Hi there I have a documnet on my PC about compiler switches and the documnetation - or rather the documentation being wrong.
Unfortuntaely I cannot remember exactly why I stipped working on it - but from memory there I had an issue with creating the changes in the documentation due to an error that was known - WRT creating documentation.
I hope this makes sense to someone... and I might get an update on whether or not it has been fixed so that I can submit some PRs for the docs. I have had a search in issues and cant seem to find the one I am after - but it is late here - I might just not be at my best! : Thanks
Unfortuntaely I cannot remember exactly why I stipped working on it - but from memory there I had an issue with creating the changes in the documentation due to an error that was known - WRT creating documentation.
I hope this makes sense to someone... and I might get an update on whether or not it has been fixed so that I can submit some PRs for the docs. I have had a search in issues and cant seem to find the one I am after - but it is late here - I might just not be at my best! : Thanks
I don't have any hint to give, but if there were something related to compiler switches in the docs, it should be easy to search it.
@octonato : Previously I ws working on getting the YAML file descriptions and the online documnetation about compiler switches to match / be current.
It was a while ago now - maybe 6 months - maybe longer.
But I had to stop the work - because there was an issue in how the documentation is created.
I unfortunately cant remember exactly but it is something like;
The docuenbtation is created by extracting values from YAML, (the YAML is the source) - but the extraction / writiing to the docs is not working properly.
I am pretty sure it is that - if not - is pretty close .
It was a while ago now - maybe 6 months - maybe longer.
But I had to stop the work - because there was an issue in how the documentation is created.
I unfortunately cant remember exactly but it is something like;
The docuenbtation is created by extracting values from YAML, (the YAML is the source) - but the extraction / writiing to the docs is not working properly.
I am pretty sure it is that - if not - is pretty close .
subsequently I had to stop the work - but have just came across all the notes I was making for changes - and thought I would chase iit up.
Is there a giter8 template for this? https://developer.lightbend.com/start/?group=play&project=play-samples-play-scala-compile-di-example
Also how active is Play development? https://github.com/playframework/playframework/pulse/monthly doesn't look so promising. At least @scala-steward PRs are being merged...
The sample app is backed by https://github.com/playframework/play-samples/tree/2.8.x/play-scala-compile-di-example (note the little Github icon to the right).
The pulse shows what is, there is not a lot of new development happening in Play for the time being.
I don't think we want to upgrade scalajs for play-json - could someone review playframework/play-json#521 so we don't get scala-steward updates for those? ;)