Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
    Geo
    @geolupascu
    anyway it is good to see that things are going on, I will do an official request about new releases
    Jan Bruusgaard
    @janbrus
    As far as I know 2019 will be backward compatible.
    I am not sure what Geo mean here "only 2 had the JSON availability". In PX-web there are two JSON output formats. JSON-stat is the format that is best suited for statstics.
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    Thats great, I saw something about a version 2 API that did not look very back-compatible to me. But that may be a later version.
    Jan Bruusgaard
    @janbrus
    Version 2 of the API is not part of 2019 Pxweb, and is not backwards compatible. As I understand the plan, PxWeb will have the possibility to offer both version 1 and 2 at the same time.
    Jan Bruusgaard
    @janbrus
    Px-web 2019 is now released by SCB, but then it is up to each agency to upgrade to the new version.
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    Hi Måns
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    H!
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    Hi!
    OK I managed to sync master and overleaf.
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    Cool!
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    Now the file that you should modify is magnusson-kainu-lahti.tex
    (./paper/ dir)
    Now paper/README.md tells how this converts to PDF
    there are other ways too of course.
    I may also work on overleaf now as we got this working but let us do regular pushes to github in order to keep things in sync
    I am talking to Markus about his schedules, otherwise I think the plan is pretty clear.
    You should add PO Box info in the affiliation, I think this was required by the journals.
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    Ok. So I think I can try to sync from Overleaf, when I write there.
    Or do you want me to not use overleaf at all?
    I was thinking of creating a template that is compiled that uses input to add the current latex file? That should work? Right?
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    now it works, I also like and use overleaf, we can use that if you prefer
    problem was just the syncing
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    Ah ok!
    So what file do you compile?
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    wait i have a call
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    Cool. I just compile the RJwrapper and it works. When you have had your call we can discuss the paper bullet points.
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    Ok great
    Yes RJwrapper.
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    So I have fixed it now. So it compiles when you work with the latex file. So I made some smaller changes in the disposition.
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    Shall I call now?
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    Gimme a minute
    now
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    sorry.. in fact I can't hear properly
    shall we call later when you're not in the train. can be also tomorrow, or next week, whatever works best
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    Sure. You could also add comments in overleaf or in Latex to give your thoughts on the bullets. If something is missing.
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    Yess
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    I still don't manage to compile RJwrapper.tex but if you can do it then all should be fine, I can always modify this through Github. We just need to try and keep in sync.
    I would have more time to look into this again after the coming week (some funding DLs). I hope it's ok? I can check the overall shape of the package, and my part of the manuscript. I have asked @muuankarski what is his take on the work.
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    Overall I think the plan is good. I added some smaller points there. Now I think it is primarily writing this up, and I may come up with small additional ideas on the way.
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    This looks great! I Added some names on the part. I suggest you write the introduction and the discussion (mostly done) and I will sketch a draft on the middle part . and fix some issues for the package. Does this sounds good?
    Leo Lahti
    @antagomir
    sounds perfect. as I mentioned, this week I really can't work on it but then I should. Perhaps we can have a follow-up chat or skype in 2-3 weeks.
    Måns Magnusson
    @MansMeg
    No problem. I'm also a little too busy right now. Although, we now have aplan on what to do and its not far to go.