raiden-network/raiden

Raiden Network

Kris

@drselump14

I tried using WalletConnect on light-client but after signing the transaction from my metamask mobile, the spinner won't stop.. is it the expected behaviour?

Kris

@drselump14

I think it's a bug from metamask mobile. Using it with imtoken works well

Mika Meyer

@TheFireMike

0xd6Ed45e70A8c8FFfBCf04cd4087d511ca5877ED9

babos77

@babos77

0x241F0D9057F299789569A20914e38de52E74df6f

smfang

@smfang

0x68810Aa33400d41F30C7830Bc676B2bcA1d647AD

Ghost

@ghost~60f9566a6da0373984819c83

0x4ACeea81cf19876a016436233E054E709E9d19D9

Srinidhi Krishnamurthy

@srikrishnamurthy

0xb0041BC1cF1eBaB6fB45e3EF78F3106eaB0c2939

Thore Strassburg

@weilbith

Alright. I just checked on Etherscan all addresses and made sure everyone has some ETH available. I also committed and pushed the full "solution" to the master branch. So you should be able to do a git fetch and then a git diff origin/master to see what is necessary to code. Or just check out the solution as is with git pull.
Thanks for attending the workshop.

Kris

@drselump14

If the light-client stores the balance proof in the browser localStorage, I'm wondering how light-client raiden-cli stores the balance proof?

Thore Strassburg

@weilbith

@drselump14 we don't store any protocol relevant state into the localStorage but into actual databases. So for a browser environment it would be IndexedDB. For the CLI we use LevelDB. The Raiden SDK is quite flexible in terms of how/where to store its state. You might want to inspect the 3rd optional parameter of the Raiden.create function.
The localStorage of the dApp only holds a few data sets like if the user accepted the disclaimer etc.

Kris

@drselump14

Thanks for the explanation

Thore Strassburg

@weilbith

You're welcome. Don't hesitate to ask if you have any further technical questions. :)

Jerry

@Jake65205859_twitter

Hi, who can I contact for business proposal?

Jacob Stenum Czepluch

@czepluch

@Jake65205859_twitter You can write me a DM here on gitter.

one-think-0116

@one-think-0116

Hi, everyone.
I am a web and mobile developer.
I am also well-versed in Blockchain.
Is there anything that I can help you?
Hope your reply.

Sebastian C. Bürgel

@SCBuergel

Hi all, was just reviewing your TokenNetwork code as we're using a slightly different payment channel implementation at HOPR and I thought it's always nice to see how others implement similar things. Can you tell me if it's correct to say that in Raiden the bidirectional "update transactions" always set an absolute amount and not a relative (delta) amount to be settled?

I'm asking as that's one major difference to the probabilistic payment channels that we use where we need to sign only relative increases of the payment channel balance.

Karl Bartel

@karlb

@SCBuergel Yes, that is true.

That makes it safe to resend messages or retry transactions, because it avoids many classes of concurrency problems.

Karl Bartel

@karlb

We try to use monotonic values whenever possible for that reason. The spec also contains documentation that might be good to read along the source, if you haven't seen that yet: https://raiden-network-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/smart_contracts.html

Karl Bartel

@karlb

@one-think-0116 We would be happy to see more projects using Raiden. You could build something using the Light Client SDK or integrate that into an existing web app where it makes sense.

Sebastian C. Bürgel

@SCBuergel

That makes it safe to resend messages or retry transactions, because it avoids many classes of concurrency problems.

thanks - yes indeed concurrency is a huge issue for us actually :-p
but we need a "proof of relay" which actually only releases a payment if the recipient can provide proof of having done some work - we have some secret sharing mechanism which is very much opinionated to our packet relaying service. By requiring that, we actually have more concurrency issues when updating channels with absolute amounts: because if you don't do work for relaying packets 1...999 but only relay packet 1000 correctly then you should not receive the payment for packets 1-999. Hence we needed to switch to a probabilistic payment channel design

2 replies

one-think-0116

@one-think-0116

thanks.

@karlb, I am blockchain developer.
What can I help you?

1 reply

Ryan Russell

@RyanRussell00

Hey all, I'm a Full-Stack Engineer/Software Engineer that's just graduated and currently interning at Microsoft.
I've spent some time learning more about the Blockchain ecosystem and I'm moving forward to specializing in this field.
I found the Raiden repo on up-for-grabs.net and saw there're a few issues labeled "good first issues".

Where would y'all recommend I get started to understand the system and to (hopefully) help contribute a bit?

1 reply

The Gouverneur

@MetaGouverneur_twitter

Hello everyone, glad to be here. I have a lot of questions about the Raiden network. First of all, I'd like to better understand how the tech works compared to the lightning network? Both use state channels, right? Is it more or less the same tech? What are the rough differences? The Raiden Network is solely focused on payments, right? Will it be cheaper than optimism for example?

Thanks in advance for any inputs :)

2 replies

Thecandypup

@thecandypup_twitter

I seem to be coming at this backwards. Any help would be good. I seem to be able to make these transactions for tokens for trade. How do I set up the process to transfer these tokens? Does anyone know the steps needed? Is there any step by step videos? Yep I’m not an expert developer?
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4a8baf6ba86dc1d78cc5144e77928e5479bf30fed814490f897e5f4e1e3cee90
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6e40016d56e0d5ed4ded3d476aeb54b87afa92ea831e0e8891a055866f5ee5cf

Thanks

1 reply

vhcleite

@vhcleite

Hello guys! Is there any RSB server working in goerli network that is compatible with raiden 2.0.0? Looks that the servers presents in here https://github.com/raiden-network/raiden-service-bundle/blob/master/known_servers.test.yaml are not working...

Jacob Stenum Czepluch

@czepluch

@vhcleite https://pfs.transport01.raiden.network/api/v1/info should work

So that would be without the /api/v1/info part

vhcleite

@vhcleite

Thanks for the reply @czepluch! I changed the pfs e matrix servers according to the command below:

./raiden-v2.0.0-linux-x86_64 --pathfinding-service-address=https://pfs.transport01.raiden.network --matrix-server=https://transport.transport01.raiden.network --eth-rpc-endpoint "https://goerli.infura.io:443/v3/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" --api-address "http://localhost:5001" --keystore-path ~/.ethereum/keystore --network-id goerli --environment-type development --log-config "raiden:debug" --accept-disclaimer

now I get this error:

1 reply

I created the accounts that I using for tests using raiden wizard... How can I change the token network registry from the accounts?

Aviv Eyal

@avive

hey, are there known issues with raiden software on macOS on ARM/M1 ? I've downloaded the wizard latest macOS release but I'm getting an OSError from ./raiden_wizard

12 replies

Also, I have an old Raiden account that was created using the raiden software. I have the account user-name and password combo. Anyone know how to retrieve the account private eth mainent key with this input?

The wizard if from latest release v1.3.0

Aviv Eyal

@avive

So regarding macOS/M1 - it is a possible bug with the wizard for raiden 2.0.0 - it works as expected on macOS/amd64

Aviv Eyal

@avive

Hi guys, I'm trying to use raiden again after a long time but I'm stuck on starting it up. I get this warning from the wizard:

`[warning ] Your Raiden database is version 26 and there is no compatible migration to version 27 available.
You need to either start a new Raiden node with a different account, or close and settle all channels, and start over with a fresh database.

More information on this topic at https://raiden-network.readthedocs.io/en/latest/other/known-issues.html#database-upgrades

If you are on mainnet and affected by this, please create an issue at https://github.com/raiden-network/raiden/issues/new?title=Mainnet%20Migration%2026%2027 [raiden.utils.upgrades]
Your Raiden database is version 26 and there is no compatible migration to version 27 available.
You need to either start a new Raiden node with a different account, or close and settle all channels, and start over with a fresh database.

More information on this topic at https://raiden-network.readthedocs.io/en/latest/other/known-issues.html#database-upgrades

If you are on mainnet and affected by this, please create an issue at https://github.com/raiden-network/raiden/issues/new?title=Mainnet%20Migration%2026%2027`

How can I access my existing funder account?

How can I settle all channels if I can't access the raiden app ?

Aviv Eyal

@avive

To be more specific, which release of raiden do I need to run in order to use db v26 ?

Jacob Stenum Czepluch

@czepluch

Hey @avive did you fix this?

iemwill

@iemwill

Hello 👋🏽 are there stable releases and prototypes or even further?

Or in general, how is the status of the raiden-network :)?

titi

@alborz4048_titi_twitter

Hi i cant buy RDN.please help me how buy from pancakeswap???

Diego Ferrer

@Ferret-san

Hello, it's been a while since I last wrote something in here, but I saw this post and I was wondering if there's a place I can reference for how the team is adding Arbitrum to the MS and PFS so that I can do the same with my project.

For reference, I worked on deploying Raiden to Optimism back in May but stopped working on it after I hit a blocker and had less time on my hands due to work and school, but I would like to finish what I started and my blocker was essentially the MS and PFS services not recognizing Optimism as a valid network even though I changed the code and built the images locally

Fraser Mackie

@WithoutWorries_twitter

tried loading the webpage but it seems odd, is it supposed to look like this?

1 reply

chao

@hackatoshi:matrix.org

[m]

Raiden wizard asks me to use infura. Is it possible to run with own node?

1 reply

Where communities thrive

People

Repo info

Activity