raiden-network/raiden

Raiden Network

titi

@alborz4048_titi_twitter

Hi i cant buy RDN.please help me how buy from pancakeswap???

Diego Ferrer

@Ferret-san

Hello, it's been a while since I last wrote something in here, but I saw this post and I was wondering if there's a place I can reference for how the team is adding Arbitrum to the MS and PFS so that I can do the same with my project.

5 replies

For reference, I worked on deploying Raiden to Optimism back in May but stopped working on it after I hit a blocker and had less time on my hands due to work and school, but I would like to finish what I started and my blocker was essentially the MS and PFS services not recognizing Optimism as a valid network even though I changed the code and built the images locally

Fraser Mackie

@WithoutWorries_twitter

tried loading the webpage but it seems odd, is it supposed to look like this?

1 reply

chao

@hackatoshi:matrix.org

[m]

Raiden wizard asks me to use infura. Is it possible to run with own node?

1 reply

Wyn Davies

@wynstrol

Hi guys. I am currently working on the Goerli network for my raiden node. However when starting my nodes I get the error

Pathfinding Service is not operating on the same Token Network Registry (0x44c886653B536178831CF2Ca0724e0dd3f75FEd6) as your node (0x5a5CF4A63022F61F1506D1A2398490c2e8dfbb98).

I am using https://pfs.transport01.raiden.network as my pathfinding service. I feel like I'm missing something here. There is not much information out there on the Token Network Registry. I have also tried not specifying a pfs so it gives me a random one but that service just says my nodes are offline (when I have 2 nodes running on my pc) so that doesnt seem to work either. Any help would be much appreciated.

Paul Lange

@palango

Hey @wynstrol , can you show me the command you use to start the raiden ndoe?

Paul Lange

@palango

And can you try adding a --development-environment unstable option if you didn't already? As we run integrations tests on those services we run them separate from the environment test users should use.

Wyn Davies

@wynstrol

Hey Paul. Here is the command I use:

--eth-rpc-endpoint "${ETH_RPC_ENDPIONT}" --network-id goerli --environment-type development --api-address "0.0.0.0:5001" --pathfinding-service-address "https://pfs.transport01.raiden.network" --matrix-server "https://transport.transport01.raiden.network" --accept-disclaimer

with the ETH_RPC_ENDPIONT being a infura address.

I tried adding --development-environment unstable but I get Error: no such option: --development-environment

Paul Lange

@palango

Which raiden version do you use?

Paul Lange

@palango

For this and for the interaction with the transport0X servers you should use the latest RC

7 replies

Wyn Davies

@wynstrol

raidennetwork/raiden:latest is what I have recently changed to. Before I used raidennetwork/raiden:develop but thought it was time for a change. Is this what you mean by the "latest RC"?

Paul Lange

@palango

@wynstrol This is the latest RC: https://github.com/raiden-network/raiden/releases/tag/v3.0.0rc5

if you need a docker image, please build it in the develop branch

We need to update the automatic docker builds after their changes to dockerhub

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

Does one require SVT tokens in order to make payments even on Goerli Testnet?

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

I keep getting this error when trying to make a transfer:
Payment couldn't be completed because: PFS returned an error while trying to fetch user information: ('There is no user found online for given address. (PFS error code: 2203)', {'address': '0xF447919A55CE3415077655E330a92fC0205fe823', 'seen_offline_since': 1391063.807376})

I'm on Goerli testnet.

Paul Lange

@palango

Depends on the PFS. If it requires payment, then you need SVT

But on testnets the service tokens are mintable

Is 0xF447919A55CE3415077655E330a92fC0205fe823 the target of your payment?

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

@palango Yes 0xF447919A55CE3415077655E330a92fC0205fe823 is the target. I minted some SVT and tried again with some to no avail. The target payment is just another node I'm running, I'm basically just trying to get a test payment working between two of my own nodes. I've already set up a channel between them and the whole process of opening the channels and everything else went smoothly. This is the address of Node 1 "0x446ef514245D0Ba90f6f32F621498172d7ce0800" (The node trying to make the transfer). I didn't specify a PFS. I consistently get this error weather I attempt to send to a node that is offline or online...

Paul Lange

@palango

which PFS's are the nodes using and are you using the light client or python client?

Can you try shutting both nodes down, and leaving them shut down for at least 30s before restarting them

This usually helps if the PFS for some reason cached a wrong presence

YC Cap

@YesCapCapital_twitter

Where does one buy RDN? Looking for somewhere not binance preferably a DEX. Not seeing much liquidity for someone in the US?

3 replies

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

@palango The PFS has been different when I've launched the node at different times. The last one I used was "https://pfs.transport01.raiden.network" which was automatically selected. I'm running things through Docker not the light client or the python client. I recently tried to run the raiden wizard on goerli and that ALSO failed. With the wizard it just gets to the end and says my node is funded with 0.1 Geth, 0 SVT and 1000 Test Tokens. It then has a button that says "Add Funds" instead of "Launch Raiden", when I click add funds it errors out and crashes. It shouldn't be this difficult to get a node up and running.

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

So through using the Raiden_Wizard I got to the point where it let me click Launch Raiden and then after downloading and installing Raiden 1.1.1 I get this error in terminal "FATAL: An unexpected exception occurred. A traceback has been written to /tmp/raiden-exception-2021-10-07T12-138qi7u3p6.txt
You need a Byzantium enabled ethereum node. Parity >= 1.7.6 <= 2.7.2 or Geth >= 1.9.7 <= 1.9.11 but you have 1.10.8 EthClient.GETH". Do I need to change my ETH end point? I'm currently using on on infura.

6 replies

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

Still getting this error "Unsupported Ethereum client version "Geth/v1.10.8-omnibus-aef5bfb3/linux-amd64/go1.16.7" [raiden.network.rpc.client] " on 2.0.0rc4 despite version 2.0.0rc4 stating that they added support for Geth 1.10, am I missing something?

Paul Lange

@palango

@atomicdomb is this just a warning or a hard error?

if it's an error, try setting --environment-type development

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

@palango I get this error when running the docker image, it's a warning not a hard error, however I still can't make transfers between nodes with open channels with each other. I also get a Fatal error when I try running the Raiden Wizard as specified in the quick start guide.
"FATAL: An unexpected exception occurred. A traceback has been written to /tmp/raiden-exception-2021-10-07T12-138qi7u3p6.txt
You need a Byzantium enabled ethereum node. Parity >= 1.7.6 <= 2.7.2 or Geth >= 1.9.7 <= 1.9.11 but you have 1.10.8 EthClient.GETH"
The raiden wizard error causes the node to hang on the "Launch Raiden Node" page.

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

UPDATE: Finally got the nodes up and running, thanks for all the help @palango!. Just to help anyone else running into the same problems as me I will list the things I had to do. I had to build out my own docker image from version 3.0.0rc6. I had to change the development-enviroment to unstable.

My final command looks like this. "--address "${NODE1_ETH_ADDRESS}" --keystore-path /raiden/keystore --password-file /raiden/password.txt --eth-rpc-endpoint "${ETH_RPC_ENDPIONT}" --network-id goerli --environment-type development --development-environment unstable --api-address "0.0.0.0:5001" --accept-disclaimer"

Paul Lange

@palango

Great @atomicdomb . I'll create an issue to create up-to-date docker images!

Raphael Lullis

@raphael:communick.com

[m]

Hey guys. Two quick questions...

First, an easy one: is there anyone on the team that can look at raiden-network/awesome-raiden#12 ?

Second: any chance that the contracts will change between now and the final release of Conruscant? The communication on twitter seemed to indicate the release will be on the 15th, correct?

4 replies

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

Suddenly I can't build the docker file anymore. The only thing that happened was a bot updated the requirements.txt file on the main github and now the make file is erroring out when make install is called by the docker file.

The error looks like this:

cd requirements; pip-sync requirements.txt _raiden.txt
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venv/bin/pip-sync", line 5, in <module>
from piptools.scripts.sync import cli
File "/opt/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/piptools/scripts/sync.py", line 12, in <module>
from pip._internal.utils.misc import get_installed_distributions
ImportError: cannot import name 'get_installed_distributions' from 'pip._internal.utils.misc' (/opt/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pip/_internal/utils/misc.py)

From my understanding only the guppy3 requirement was changed from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 but for some reason this has broken docker building, can this please be changed back or resolved?

atomicdomb

@atomicdomb

UPDATE: Managed to fix the error by updating the dockerfile, the python version needed to be updated to 3.8 from 3.7, so the lines that say:
FROM python:3.7 as builder
FROM python:3.7-slim as runner
Must become
FROM python:3.8 as builder
FROM python:3.8-slim as runner

Chaki₿ 🚀🌒

@ChakibTheOne_twitter

Hello, is there any Bridge project using the Raiden state channel tech to bridge ERC20 and NFT between L2 and EVM blockchains ?

mikejmat

@mikejmat

Hi all. Just started up my node for the first time. Quick Connect just keeps saying "Could not fetch any suggestions"

1 reply

mikejmat

@mikejmat

At least seeing this today in the console, but still not working

You have chosen the Pathfinding Service at https://pfs.raiden.dappnode.io.
Operator: community@dappnode.io, running version: 0.15.4, chain_id: 1.
Fees will be paid to 0x60eAE5572D7094B63cA8C854eE8132EDc65570b3. Each request costs 1e-16 RDN.
Message from the Pathfinding Service:
DAppNode
2021-10-17 08:00:10.882745 [info ] Using Pathfinding Service [raiden.network.pathfinding] pfs_info=PFSInfo(url='https://pfs.raiden.dappnode.io', price=100, chain_id=1, token_network_registry_address=b'm\x07\xa2\xef\x8d\xe5\xd7\xd4\x837Q\x0b\xce\xb9\xfe\xeaT$\xb2\x0c', user_deposit_address=b'\x1cb\xfff\xaf\x8a\xadA\x00e\xe0#8\xf5\xbf\xbb\xe2>\x1f\x10', payment_address=b'`\xea\xe5W-p\x94\xb6<\xa8\xc8T\xee\x812\xed\xc6Up\xb3', message='DAppNode', operator='community@dappnode.io', version='0.15.4', confirmed_block_number=13434221, matrix_server='transport.raiden.dappnode.io')

smallyu

@smallyunet

Hi, I have some confusion with the mediation fee. Such as I send payment with the amount of 12 (mediation fee 2 of it), and then mediations node A receives amount 10 as mediation fee because the mediations node-set fee schedule is 10. (https://raiden-network.readthedocs.io/en/stable/using-raiden-on-mainnet/overview.html?highlight=fee#changing-your-fee-schedule). The target node only receives 2 finally. Is this possible?

8 replies

smallyu

@smallyunet

Hello, could I find something that makes me understand, what the difference between "token address" and "token network address" is?

2 replies

iemwill

@iemwill

Don’t get your point after the ;

In general, is there somewhere a good OnePager of the Infrastructure how raiden should work?

2 replies

iemwill

@iemwill

WoW! Thanks. So similar to the Lightning Network concept. 🧶->(👾)
?¿

adeptflax

@adeptflax

What's the actual state of this project? How close is the full version to be to deployed on the mainnet?

adeptflax

@adeptflax

Ok there's mainnet version.

I'm confused

Jacob Stenum Czepluch

@czepluch

@adeptflax We have been on mainnet for years, but we are still actively developing the project so new releases are coming out.

Where communities thrive

People

Repo info

Activity