These are chat archives for ramda/ramda

30th
Jan 2015
Jethro Larson
@jethrolarson
Jan 30 2015 01:09
@buzzdecafe How can I contribute examples for the TryIt?
Michael Hurley
@buzzdecafe
Jan 30 2015 11:19
great question -- once i add it to the repo please send PRs
i'm still thinking about the best way to get the correct script in the repl for each version
Danny Arnold
@despairblue
Jan 30 2015 14:11
Does the repl incorporate 6to5? Asking because of the options.
Raine Virta
@raine
Jan 30 2015 15:01
there was some mention about traceur, so i don't think so
Nate Wildermuth
@wildermuthn
Jan 30 2015 15:37
Nice repl! ES6's arrow functions really make Ramda even more powerful, IMO: http://ramdajs.com/0.9/repl/#R.map(x%20%3D%3E%20x%20%2B%201%2C%20%5B10%2C%2020%2C%2030%5D)%3B
Comparison in the repl: http://goo.gl/UlZ8Oj
Nate Wildermuth
@wildermuthn
Jan 30 2015 16:24
Ok, this is fun to make REPL examples, and easy to share with a shortner: http://goo.gl/eORJOR (ES6 destructuring comparison and example)
@buzzdecafe Are you considering using a JS framework? Angular, React, etc?
Danny Arnold
@despairblue
Jan 30 2015 16:32
6to5, traceur, same diff ^^
so it supports es6, cool
Kyle J. Kress
@toastal
Jan 30 2015 16:38
I got Ramda ElbertF/Wappalyzer@2e8844c into Wappalyzer, a neat browser extension that lets you see the tech stack on a website when you visit.
Jethro Larson
@jethrolarson
Jan 30 2015 19:09
If you go point-free arrows don't matter
David Chambers
@davidchambers
Jan 30 2015 19:09
My thoughts exactly. :)
Jethro Larson
@jethrolarson
Jan 30 2015 19:35
I'm working on a talk on point-free programming in js. My intro so far: https://gist.github.com/jethrolarson/e376554cf6becab4f8bf
I'm choosing to talk about the style and I'm leaving ramda as merely a applicable lib that has all the smart functions so the user doesn't have to create their own. I might be channeling @drboolean as I think the Bob Ross delivery is nice. I venture to not outrun the audience the way he does though.
I didn't know it'd inline the gist. Oh well.
must. not. talk. about. monads. in. presentation.
David Chambers
@davidchambers
Jan 30 2015 19:38
Haha, I've made that mistake once before.
Jethro Larson
@jethrolarson
Jan 30 2015 19:39
Once you get them, they seem simple but you lose the ability to explain them.
David Chambers
@davidchambers
Jan 30 2015 19:40
I gave a lightning talk on using zero- and one-element arrays as maybes.
Jethro Larson
@jethrolarson
Jan 30 2015 19:41