These are chat archives for ramda/ramda

23rd
Sep 2017
Armando Cordova
@lrn2prgrm
Sep 23 2017 08:05
i see it is in 0. something
but
can i use this in production?
should I?
i mean how buggy or feature lacking can be?
Philipp Wille
@Yord
Sep 23 2017 09:10
@lrn2prgrm You mean Ramda? I am using it for (almost) all of my projects in production (automotive context). I have not found it lacking essential features, and for niche features you can just compose a few functions it gives you to extend it. For my part, I have not encountered any bugs, but as no software is without bugs I cannot say it is bug-free. But it is definitely not buggy.
Armando Cordova
@lrn2prgrm
Sep 23 2017 16:33
Awesome. Yeah I saw a video about underscore doing it wrong (which seems a proto ramda). Pretty impressive. Hope to see it in 1.0 already this library is awesome and has many years around.
Brad Compton (he/him)
@Bradcomp
Sep 23 2017 18:00
We use it all over the place in production code. It works and has a solid test suite.
Philipp Wille
@Yord
Sep 23 2017 18:54

Yeah I saw a video about underscore doing it wrong

This is exactly like I came to Ramda ;) Big shout-out to Brian Lonsdorf, his video is incredibly inspiring!

Armando Cordova
@lrn2prgrm
Sep 23 2017 19:02
It really is. I don't understand why this industry isn't more functional already (taking into account how amazing and old -real- functional is)