It's the first public Hello World! diagram. :^)
Compare:
REBOL
>> str: "one two three"
== "one two three"
>> set [value str] load/next str
== [one " two three"]
>> set [value str] load/next str
== [two " three"]
>> set [value str] load/next str
== [three ""]Red:
>> str: "one two three"
== "one two three"
>> load/next str 'str
== one
>> load/next str 'str
== two
>> load/next str 'str
== three
Hi everybody: The software I wrote with Red for paediatric application about face evolution in children is now open source . You can get the code here: https://github.com/ldci/Face
@toomasv So in Red you are forced to use the same word that contains the source series.
/next => Load the next value only, updates source series word.
position [word!] "Word updated with new series position."a: {does x: 22 print ["hello"] probe x}
== {does x: 22 print ["hello"] probe x}
>> load/next {x: 22 print ["hello"] probe x} 'a
== x:
>> load/next a 'val
== x:
>> load/next a 'val
== x:>> load/next a 'a
== does
>> load/next a 'a
== x:
>> load/next a 'a
== 22While in Rebol it can be any word. I don't understand the reason but it's ok.
(note: it's a curiosity and not a complaint)
but guess for compatibility with normal
load
when your argument's type and meaning changes based on refinements it's kinda bad
@GiuseppeChillemi There is no difference between REBOL and Red in this respect. If you want to use exactly same line of code to move forward then both REBOL and Red have to use same word, but you can change word on each line if you want, e.g.
>> str: "one two three"
== "one two three"
>> load/next str 'str1
== one
>> load/next str1 'str2
== two
>> load/next str2 'str3
== three
@GiuseppeChillemi using @toomasv's example, this is correct for Red:
parse text blk-rule: [
some [
str:
newline |
#";" [thru newline | to end] new: (probe copy/part str new) |
[#"[" | #"("] blk-rule |
[#"]" | #")"] break |
skip (value: load/next str 'new probe :value) :new
]
]
He owns https://ameridroid.com/ and they sell Pine64 products.
@ldci good job!
@greggirwin An old journalist from the parliament in my country once said on TV:
A specialist is someone who knows almost everything about almost nothing.
A journalist is someone who knows almost nothing about almost everything.
So you are a specialist, the right person to ask. 😊
How have added inner and outer hyperlinks? Is it a new Red feature?
I like this help doc navigator, it reminds me of Windows Help. I see it simple to create: a text-list, a text-area and 2 button. Is there other magic behind?
It is magic, using Red's rich-text style and rich text dialect, driven by a custom parser against an internal make-doc/markdown like format used for help content.