Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Feb 08 17:56

    rlabbe on master

    gitHub #223 Improved docstring … Fix typo 'transistion' -> 'tran… docs: rts_smoother: Fix wrong r… and 3 more (compare)

  • Feb 08 17:51

    rlabbe on master

    gitHub #233 Improved docstring … Merge branch 'master' of https:… (compare)

  • Jan 04 03:55

    rlabbe on master

    Fix misleading comment Hi! … Merge pull request #219 from Ph… (compare)

  • Nov 20 2020 18:51

    rlabbe on master

    Fix test by relaxing near_eq (f… Merge pull request #217 from pg… (compare)

  • Nov 20 2020 18:50

    rlabbe on master

    docs: rts_smoother: Fix wrong r… Merge pull request #216 from nh… (compare)

  • Nov 20 2020 18:50

    rlabbe on master

    Fix typo 'transistion' -> 'tran… Merge pull request #213 from nh… (compare)

  • Oct 19 2020 18:33

    rlabbe on master

    Fixed some typos Merge pull request #358 from Co… (compare)

  • Oct 14 2020 01:00

    rlabbe on master

    Updated animations I haven't r… (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 23:39

    rlabbe on master

    Updated for Python 3.6 Updated for Python 3.6 Updated for Python 3.6 and 15 more (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 23:39

    rlabbe on v2.0

    Updated for Python 3.6 Updated for Python 3.6 Updated for Python 3.6 and 15 more (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 20:57

    rlabbe on v1.1

    (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 20:32

    rlabbe on master

    Issue #208 assert comment name… (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 18:56

    rlabbe on master

    Added comments for how to curre… (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 18:54

    rlabbe on master

    Issue #339 Simplied code for in… (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 16:58

    rlabbe on master

    Fixed docstring for gaussian() … (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 16:42

    rlabbe on master

    Issue #332 Fixed terrible word… (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 16:21

    rlabbe on master

    Issue #338 Fixed error in usin… (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 16:17

    rlabbe on master

    Issue #343 Measurements were b… (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 15:47

    rlabbe on master

    Issue #352 axis labels were ha… (compare)

  • Oct 13 2020 15:35

    rlabbe on master

    Fix for #377 Somehow this didn… (compare)

Julia Schwarz
@julenka
Hi, I'm going through the textbook and it's really great! I'm on chapter 5 section "Multivariate Normal Distributions" and found that it was hard to understand how adding in covariance elements affected the resulting PDF since the figure was static. So at the top I changed %matplotlib inline to %matplotlib notebook and the figure became interactive! I could rotate the PDF to see more angles.
Not sure if it's worth changing but I figured I'd make the suggestion
Another suggestion is, in chapter 1 function plot_estimate_chart_3(), the residual line is black and is hard to see. I updated my local copy to make it green, though something brighter like magenta could be better. Change line 107 of code/gh_internal.py:
ax.annotate('', xy=[1,159], xytext=[1,164.2], arrowprops=dict(arrowstyle='-', ec='g', lw=1, shrinkA=8, shrinkB=8))
Julia Schwarz
@julenka
Oh, I think I see a downside to using %matplotlib notebook, it seems to prevent generation of other figures in that chapter. Never mind :-)
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe
Yes, I think you need to put %matplotlib notebook into every cell. It seems flakey, sometimes the graph will not regenerate no matter what.
There is a tension that I am trying to balance with the charts - I want more interactivity, but some people use the PDF version of the book. The interactive charting software have not implemented the hooks that allow nbconvert (which converts the notebooks into latex which I then convert to PDF) to extract the graphs. I'm sort of thinking about parsing the notebooks prior to running nbconvert, and replacing the interactive charts with boring old matplotlib, and then executing the cells.
Also, colors are tricky. I'm talking to publishers, and print will be black and white. I keep changing the plot settings to make the plots readable in B&W, but that seems like a bit of a waste of time - I can solve that problem when it comes time.
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe
I'll take a look at the code change you mentioned, and incorporate it if it makes sense in the context of all that. Thanks!
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe
@julenka I found the extra color a bit garish, and I am no designer. I opted to make the line width thicker, and change the grid to dotted lines. I think it is more readable now.
Julia Schwarz
@julenka
@rlabbe dotted lines is a better choice, especially if you're working in black and white. Thanks!
empirical-bayesian
@empirical-bayesian
@rlabbe or anyone listening: Is there a way of getting the log-likelihood of a model on a set of data out from the Kalman filter class? Does the class handle missing data, e.g., by marking missing using Numpy's ma.array? Finally, aside from studying the code, does the implementation use the SVD way of calculation, per R's dlm (see https://hypergeometric.wordpress.com/2015/07/29/comprehensive-and-compact-tutorial-on-petris-dlm-package-in-r/), or square root filter, or some other way? Thank you!
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe

Hi. Those are good additions for the library. Here's the current status:

Missing data is handled by setting z=None. If using batch_filter, you might call it with kf.batch_filter(zs=[1., 2., 3., None, 5.]). That is probably not 'canonical' python behavior, and I will add it to the issues.

I am working on log-likelihood, and metrics like NEES, NIS, etc for the next release of FilterPy.

I do not currently have an SVD filter. It is on the backlog.

The Kalman filter class uses the standard linear Kalman filter equations; this makes it more pedagogical in nature, though I have used it plenty of times in less demanding situations. The only concession I made to real world engineering is in the computation of P - the published (I-KH)P equation is unstable.

A square root filter is implemented by the class SquareRootKalmanFilter, in the filterpy.kalman module. Read the documentation carefully - this is more a reference implementation and i have not used it in production. Brown suggests that square root filters are no longer needed with modern hardware unless P is going to vary by 20 orders of magnitude. His reasoning seems strong, but I do not have empirical evidence to back that up.

To round out the descriptions, there is also a fading memory and information filter implemented for the linear filters. I have an EKF and UKF, but not with the square root variants.

If you want to compute the log-likelihood yourself you can. This link gives the equation for the computation: http://www.econ.umn.edu/~karib003/help/kalman_example1.htm. Their 'C_t' can be accessed with 'kf.S' in my code after calling update().

Roger Labbe
@rlabbe
Here is some code for likelihood. Haven't really tested it
import numpy as np
from scipy.stats import multivariate_normal
from numpy import dot, log, exp
import scipy.linalg as la
def gaus_pdf(X, M, S):
    DX = (X-M)[0,0]
    E = 0.5*np.dot(DX.T, (S/DX))
    d = M.shape[0]
    E = E + 0.5 * d * log(2*np.pi) + 0.5 * log(la.det(S));
    P = exp(-E)
    return P


def kf_liklihood(x, P, z, H, R):
    IM = np.dot(H, x)
    S = np.dot(H, P).dot(H.T) + R
    print(gaus_pdf(z, IM, S))
    print(multivariate_normal.pdf(z, mean=IM, cov=S))
    return multivariate_normal.pdf(z, mean=IM, cov=S)
Here is code for likelihood that I haven't really tested
from scipy.stats import multivariate_normal
def likelihood(x, P, z, H, R):
    IM = np.dot(H, x)
    S = np.dot(H, P).dot(H.T) + R
    return multivariate_normal.pdf(z, mean=IM, cov=S)
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe

FilterPy 0.0.26 changes:

  • Added likelihood and log-likelihood to the KalmanFilter
    class.

  • Added an MMAE filter bank class.

  • Added function to compute NEES

Soheil Yasrebi
@soheil
hmm
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe
FilterPy 0.0.27 changes:
  • Added function to compute update in the presense of
    correlated process and measurement noise.
    • Added IMM filter.
    • added tests for IMM and MMAE filters
    • Added display of semi-axis for covariance ellipses
    • various bug fixes
skyxtwang
@skyxtwang

When I install the packge filterpy,I got the following error:
C:\WINDOWS\system32>conda install --channel https://conda.anaconda.org/phios filterpy
Fetching package metadata: ......
Solving package specifications: ..........
Error: Unsatisfiable package specifications.
Generating hint:
[ COMPLETE ]|##################################################| 100%

Hint: the following packages conflict with each other:

  • filterpy
  • python 3.5*

Use 'conda info filterpy' etc. to see the dependencies for each package.

Note that the following features are enabled:

  • vc14
    I want to know wether the filterpy can be installed with python3.5 and how can solute this problems.Thanks.
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe
Sorry, I jsut saw this. I don't know who phios is, it is some random person that put filterpy on conda. filterpy works in python 3.5 - I do all development on the latest releases of Python 3. Try pip install filterpy instead; that should work. Recently I tried to get filterpy working with conda; conda install filterpy might work for windows, but I have reports it doesn't work for mac and linux yet. I need to put more effort on this.
Mateusz Sadowski
@msadowski
hi @rlabbe! Just started reading your book and it looks great so far! A quick question: would you like me to let you know about any typos I find and if so is this chat room the right place?
Just before I forget here is the first one I spotted: But sitting down and trying to read many of these books is a dismal and trying experience if you do not have the necessary background. [chapter 00]. I think you meant tiring
Just noticed that I marked the wrong trying, I meant the next one dismal and trying experience . Let me know if I should continue doing that or not :). Thanks for the great book!
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe
Hi @msadowski , sure, typo reports are great! You can do it here or type up a github issue, whichever is easier.
Mateusz Sadowski
@msadowski
would it make your life easier if I corrected them as I go and then make commits chapter by chapter and then make pull requests for the changes? I would be quite happy to do that since I'm planning to read the book 'cover to cover'
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe
yes, that is how most people have done it. Once or twice we have had issues where about every line is for some reason marked as a change (I suspect line endings differences between windows and linux), and endup with something like 50,000 lines changes. Of course i had to reject those because there was no reasonable way for me to code/word review before accepting. Just keep the repo up to date and there should be no problem. my pace of change has really slowed down so that shouldn't be an issue
Mateusz Sadowski
@msadowski
Hi rlabbe, Just to let you know: it seems that filterpy is missing again from your binder builld (http://app.mybinder.org/2637687816/notebooks/03-Gaussians.ipynb)
Roger Labbe
@rlabbe
sorry. just saw this. I seem to have it fixed now
Adam Milner
@carmiac
Hi Roger! Thanks for this book, so far my read through it has been very helpful. There is one concept that I am having problems understanding related to a problem I am working on. How does the UKF deal with control inputs to the system? The system I am looking at has a fairly simple A matrix (diagonal, mostly unity), with a full B matrix and a non-linear measurement function. Does the UKF deal with this well?
Kishan
@kishb87
Does anyone know of smoothing techniques that can be used for a EKF? It looks like all the smoothing techniques in FilterPy are linear problems. Am I right?
Suresh Sharma
@sursha
Hi @rlabbe! Just getting started with your book, thanks for your work!
alimohebbi
@alimohebbi
hi
i wonna run a code about robot motion using ekf
code are in the book
but get this erros
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scipy/_lib/_util.py", line 231, in _asarray_validated
raise ValueError('object arrays are not supported')
ValueError: object arrays are not supported
what should i do?
Matthias
@maluethi
@rlabbe: I am reading through your book online and so far it has been amazing, thanks for publishing all this!
Although I did not read all chapters yet, it came to my understanding that outliers (measurements containing no information) are pretty bad for a 'standard' Kalman filter. By just searching trough the pdf version I didn't find any mention of outliers. So I was wondering if you could point me to any resources that introduce outlier handling within kalman filtering? Of course I googled but I cannot really judge the quality for a beginner of all the different results I get back...