These are chat archives for rust-lang/rust

Sep 2018
Sep 16 2018 17:48
Is it possible to write a 'generics' version of a closure? I have some simple athematic that I have to perform on different int types
Sep 16 2018 18:04
@ashthespy I've read a couple of books on rust and never saw anything like that, so I don't think there is.
Any work-around I can think of negates the benefits of a closure, like capturing the surrounding environment. If you don't need that you could just write a generic function and use that.
Sep 16 2018 18:27
that would be an option indeed. Thanks!
Sep 16 2018 19:03
@ashthespy unfortunately closure inplements the first Fn* trait bound it encounters.
If closure is passed as argument to generic method then it implements Fn bound of the type parameter.
If you bind closure to variable and call it later it implements one of Fn* depending on how you call it. Only first call counts.
Closure never implements more than one Fn* trait (except HKLB).
And since implementing Fn* trait for generic argument is the same as implement multiple Fn* traits for different argument types - closure can't do it either.
Sep 16 2018 23:38

Hello, I need some help here solving a problem with closures. I have this:

  let mut varegrupper: Vec<Varegruppe> = vec![];
    let future = SqlConnection::connect(conn_str).and_then(|conn| {
      .simple_query("SELECT * from nxDw.dbo.Varegr")
      .for_each(|row: QueryRow| {
        let r1: &str = row.get(0);
        let r2: &str = row.get(1);
        let r3: &str = row.get(2);

        &varegrupper.push(Varegruppe::new(r1, r2, r3));

  match current_thread::block_on_all(future) {
    Ok(_) => Ok(varegrupper),
    Err(e) => Err(e),

And i get a cannot move out ofvaregrupperbecause it is borrowed error. I know how that works, but I see no way of solving it...

If I create a "scope" around the closure, then futures goes out of scope before the final match...