Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Jul 10 04:40
    scala-steward opened #203
  • Jul 03 03:01
    scala-steward opened #202
  • Jun 18 10:56
    scala-steward opened #201
  • Jun 13 11:55

    sake92 on master

    Update README.md (compare)

  • Jun 13 11:51
    sake92 commented #18
  • Jun 05 22:15
    sake92 commented #18
  • Jun 05 22:12
    sake92 labeled #200
  • Jun 05 22:08
    sake92 opened #200
  • May 31 00:39
    scala-steward closed #198
  • May 31 00:39
    scala-steward commented #198
  • May 31 00:39
    scala-steward opened #199
  • May 20 23:18
    scala-steward opened #198
  • May 17 11:50
    scala-steward opened #197
  • May 14 18:06
    scala-steward opened #196
  • May 14 18:06
    scala-steward opened #195
  • Apr 29 22:59

    sake92 on sake92-patch-1

    (compare)

  • Apr 29 22:59

    sake92 on sake92-patch-2

    (compare)

  • Apr 29 22:59

    sake92 on sake92-sbt-ci-release

    (compare)

  • Apr 29 22:59

    sake92 on improve-grid-components

    (compare)

  • Apr 29 22:59

    sake92 on add-class-helpers

    (compare)

Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
just need to separate the platform independent hepek-components
there is some stuff that relies on JSoup and other Java libraries
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
is it on github yet ?
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
nope, not yet :D
not finished yet
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
No problem. Count me in as a super early adopter
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
hehe, thanks :smiley:
with ScalaJS you usually use a reactive library
I tried ScalaRx but didn't like it, all those implicits and owners stuff..
It would fit nicely with Hepek also I think
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
My only concern would be bundle size. I have personally seen bundle size shooting up to 8 mb in scalajs. It was using scalajs-react though so react js in itself add to it
basic scalajs app is around 60kb I think but most client libraries add a lot of unnecessary stuff
Tried laminar it stands around 400 kb optimized with a great deal of complexity to my taste
scalajs-react with all its events passing and all is way too much complexity in my opinion
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
this TODO thingy is 1.6MB fastOpt
Hepek shouldn't add much, it's just HTML..
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
It doesn't that's what make it attractive. Sweet and simple
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
yeah, complexity is the biggest concern to me
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
Will take a look at rescala
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
cool :)
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
Do you have a timeline when you plan to release it. I am just curious how it will work.
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
not really, I should find time this week
you can play with that TODO example
instead of those Scalatags stuff there would be Hepek row, inputText etc
not that much to it :D
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
Ok thanks.
container is-fluid
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
@ikamthania here's PR for ScalaJS
you can publishLocal in order to try it
it compiles, but I found some rough edges regarding Scalatags.. not very pleasant to use yet
I'll try to find some workarounds before merging it
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania

you can publishLocal in order to try it

Thanks. I will give it a try soon.

Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
Do we have is-fluid modifier in hepek or we need to use it as cls:="is-fluid"
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
nope
it's not general enough to be included
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
:thumbsup:
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
This PR fixes most of annoyances I found with ScalaJS Scalatags API
hopefully it gets merged soon
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
My God yes...
Finally we have usable scalatags
0.9.2
Gonna release a new hepek version