Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Nov 26 16:12
    scala-steward closed #213
  • Nov 26 16:12
    scala-steward commented #213
  • Nov 26 16:12
    scala-steward opened #214
  • Nov 12 21:42
    scala-steward closed #207
  • Nov 12 21:42
    scala-steward commented #207
  • Nov 12 21:42
    scala-steward opened #213
  • Nov 05 05:52
    scala-steward opened #212
  • Nov 02 07:09
    scala-steward closed #197
  • Nov 02 07:09
    scala-steward opened #211
  • Nov 02 07:09
    scala-steward commented #197
  • Sep 30 09:08
    scala-steward closed #204
  • Sep 30 09:08
    scala-steward commented #204
  • Sep 30 09:08
    scala-steward opened #210
  • Sep 19 10:52
    sake92 labeled #18
  • Sep 18 00:52
    scala-steward closed #196
  • Sep 18 00:52
    scala-steward commented #196
  • Sep 18 00:52
    scala-steward opened #209
  • Sep 18 00:52
    scala-steward closed #195
  • Sep 18 00:52
    scala-steward commented #195
  • Sep 18 00:52
    scala-steward opened #208
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
hehe, thanks :smiley:
with ScalaJS you usually use a reactive library
I tried ScalaRx but didn't like it, all those implicits and owners stuff..
It would fit nicely with Hepek also I think
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
My only concern would be bundle size. I have personally seen bundle size shooting up to 8 mb in scalajs. It was using scalajs-react though so react js in itself add to it
basic scalajs app is around 60kb I think but most client libraries add a lot of unnecessary stuff
Tried laminar it stands around 400 kb optimized with a great deal of complexity to my taste
scalajs-react with all its events passing and all is way too much complexity in my opinion
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
this TODO thingy is 1.6MB fastOpt
Hepek shouldn't add much, it's just HTML..
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
It doesn't that's what make it attractive. Sweet and simple
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
yeah, complexity is the biggest concern to me
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
Will take a look at rescala
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
cool :)
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
Do you have a timeline when you plan to release it. I am just curious how it will work.
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
not really, I should find time this week
you can play with that TODO example
instead of those Scalatags stuff there would be Hepek row, inputText etc
not that much to it :D
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
Ok thanks.
container is-fluid
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
@ikamthania here's PR for ScalaJS
you can publishLocal in order to try it
it compiles, but I found some rough edges regarding Scalatags.. not very pleasant to use yet
I'll try to find some workarounds before merging it
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania

you can publishLocal in order to try it

Thanks. I will give it a try soon.

Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
Do we have is-fluid modifier in hepek or we need to use it as cls:="is-fluid"
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
nope
it's not general enough to be included
Shubham Kamthania
@ikamthania
:thumbsup:
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
This PR fixes most of annoyances I found with ScalaJS Scalatags API
hopefully it gets merged soon
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
My God yes...
Finally we have usable scalatags
0.9.2
Gonna release a new hepek version
Hepek-components are gonna be usable in ScalaJS also.. 🥳
I am thinking about moving them to a separate repo and rename them
Because now we have 2+ projects in one
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92

If someone's interested, here's a fullstack app featuring Hepek components and ReScala: https://github.com/sake92/playful-scala
Sakib Hadžiavdić
@sake92
Hello there! I released my own RX library if someon is interested: https://github.com/sake92/RxTags
playful-scala is also refactored to use it :)