Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Oct 17 22:00
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 21:52
    glemaitre edited #869
  • Oct 17 21:50
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 21:50
    glemaitre synchronize #869
  • Oct 17 21:45
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 21:45
    glemaitre synchronize #869
  • Oct 17 20:44
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 20:44
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 20:43
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 20:42
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 20:41
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 20:33
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 20:33
    glemaitre synchronize #869
  • Oct 17 18:20
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 18:18
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 18:16
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 18:16
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 18:14
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 18:05
    codecov[bot] commented #869
  • Oct 17 18:05
    glemaitre synchronize #869
apparently you just like multiply the image stuff
and then reshape back
idk how well it'll work though
MariMari7
@MariMari7

I used SMOTEENN and SMOTE Tomek in my initial data, they take between 1,5 and 2,5 hours. But when I added some data, they run 5 hours before I interrupted them.

  • Initial data : 49,77 MB
  • Added data : 79,25 MB

  • All data = 129,02 MB

NB. SMOTE take just some second for All data.

HugoTex98
@HugoTex98
Really interesting @krinetic1234... but using that reshape will not cause loss of information?
krinetic1234
@krinetic1234
i thought so too.... do any of you know of a better way
to do this "SMOTE" idea for images
and btw i tried the reshape and it dint rly work properly
Akilu Rilwan Muhammad
@arilwan

You just need to operate proper reshaping. I once worked with a time series activity data in which I created chunks of N-size time-steps. The shape of my input was (1, 100, 4). So for the training sample, I have (n_samples, 1, 100, 4) and was a five-class, multi-minority problem, that I want to oversample using SMOTE.

The way I go about it was to flatten the input, like so:

#..reshape (flatten) Train_X for SMOTE resanpling
nsamples, k, nx, ny = Train_X.shape
#Train_X = Train_X.reshape((nsamples,nx*ny))

#smote = SMOTE('not majority', random_state=42, k_neighbors=5)
#X_reample, Y_resample = smote.fit_sample(Train_X, Train_Y)

And then reshape the instance back to the original input shape, like so:

#..reshape input back to CNN xture
X_reample = X_reample.reshape(len(X_reample), k, nx, ny)
krinetic1234
@krinetic1234
ok but does SMOTE actually augment images? @arilwan
like lets say that i have tons of images of cats and few images of dogs, does it actually augment the dog images? and if so, how does it oversample those?
i haven't seen much where people use SMOTE for oversampling images specifically, which is why im surprised
thanks by the way, i'll definitely check what you sent
i believe i did somethign simliar but got an error
krinetic1234
@krinetic1234
Screen Shot 2021-06-28 at 10.54.48 PM.png
so i was also wondering something
i tried to do that and it didn't work
do you have any advice on what to do differently?
i didnt do exactly how you did but thoguht this was a simpler appraoch, conceptually-wise
Soledad Galli
@solegalli
In the instance hardness threshold, when in the docs says "InstanceHardnessThreshold is a specific algorithm in which a classifier is trained on the data and the samples with lower probabilities are removed"(https://imbalanced-learn.org/stable/under_sampling.html#instance-hardness-threshold) what probability exactly is it referring to? The probability of the majority? or the probability of the minority? It is not clear to me from the docs.
Assuming that the target has 2 classes, 0 and 1, and 1 is the minority class: cross_val_predict will return an array with the probabilities of class 0 and 1. Then the code takes the first vector (https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/imbalanced-learn/blob/f177b05/imblearn/under_sampling/_prototype_selection/_instance_hardness_threshold.py#L156), that is the probability of being of the majority class, and keeps those with the highest probability, so those that are easier to classify correctly as members of the majority. So far, I think I understand.
But if the target has 3 classes, 0, 1 and 2, and only 2 is the minority, the code (https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/imbalanced-learn/blob/f177b05/imblearn/under_sampling/_prototype_selection/_instance_hardness_threshold.py#L156) will only take the first vector of probabilities, that is of class 0. But for class 1, should it not be taking the second vector? is this a bug? or am I understanding the code wrongly?
Amila Wickramasinghe
@AmilaSamith
I am trying to use a customize generator. But it gives the following error :
try:
import keras
ParentClass = keras.utils.Sequence
HAS_KERAS = True
except ImportError: AttributeError: module 'keras.utils' has no attribute 'Sequence' in _generator.py file. What can I do to overcome this error?
Soledad Galli
@solegalli
In Random Oversampling, when applying shrinkage we multiply the std of each variable, by the srhinkage (arbitrary and entered by the user) a smoothing_constant. The smoothing_constant is (4 / ((n_features + 2) n_samples)) ** (1 / (n_features + 4). What is the logic for this constant?
Also, as per the docs on RandomOversampling, "When generating a smoothed bootstrap, this method is also known as Random Over-Sampling Examples (ROSE) [1]." But, in the ROSE paper, do the authors not select samples which probability is 1/2? In RandomOversampling the smoothing is applied to all randomly extracted samples, regardless of their original probability.
James Proctor
@j-proc
Is there a simpler/built-in way to convert/cast imblearn objects to their sklearn object base/equivalent? My workaround is to create the base using all matching values from the object's dict and then once created update the sklearn object's dict with the imblearn object's dict.
Guillaume Lemaitre
@glemaitre
imblearn object are inheriting from BaseEstimator from scikit-learn. So I am not sure what do you mean by converting it?
which type of operation you would like to apply that is a blocker?
James Proctor
@j-proc
I actually just needed to convert/downcast the type for compatibility with an external package that only supports sklearn objects. I wouldn't be calling fit which is where I expect the major changes occur but I thought it might be possible via a less hacky way.
Guillaume Lemaitre
@glemaitre
But what is a sklearn object? Supposedly sklearn just provide the BaseEstimator class. Which check is done in the external package?