PlainCodec[Option[Filter]] you might override the built-in mechanism for handling optionals. As I assume there exists a PlainCodec[Option[A]] for any A where PlainCodec[A] exists. Which means you should define a PlainCodec[Filter] and then it plays nicely.
PlainCodec[Option[Filter]] defined a codec between String <-> Option[Filter]. However, query requires a codec between List[String] <-> Option[Filter] - as query parameters can be repeated. Tapir knows how to convert a String <-> T codec into List[String] <-> Option[T], but doesn't have built in conversions for String <-> Option[T]
Is there a way to guarantee a strict order of requests?
Short of going back to a sync backend (I'm currently using cats.effects/Armeria) or introducing some sort of artificial delay between calls, I can't think of any way to achieve this.
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
5 replies
Hey team, sttp 3.3.15 introduced a binary incompatibility with 3.3.14, is that a known issue? Particularly it was this change:
https://github.com/softwaremill/sttp/pull/1119/files#diff-328a76b199b03a413e3a607009ce6d0ee31047193247381451e5b1362c1c96eeR15
I spotted this because my application gave me a "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: sttp.client3.FollowRedirectsBackend.<init>(Lsttp/client3/SttpBackend;Lscala/collection/immutable/Set;Lscala/collection/immutable/Set;)V"
(That happened after I updated one of my dependencies which transitively pulled 3.3.16 and my current version of sttp which was 3.3.14 was evicted)
1 reply
https://github.com/softwaremill/sttp/runs/3776276618?check_suite_focus=true#step:8:1221
The corresponding CI build was not checking bincompat because "mimaPreviousArtifacts" was empty for some reason
https://github.com/softwaremill/sttp/runs/4272599204?check_suite_focus=true#step:8:1252
9 replies
Hi there. I'm having a hard time upgrading from v2 to v3 due to the requirement of send to tie R to an Effect[F]
I had a class with the following definition:
class TracedLoggingSttpBackend[F[_], G[_]: Sync: Trace, +P](
val delegate: SttpBackend[F, P],
liftK: F ~> G
) extends SttpBackend[G, P]And I was able to pass the Request from the backend to its delegate and simply run liftK on the result of it.
Now, because Request is tied to the SttpBackend's first type param (F or G), the requests become incompatible.
This was the setup we were using to tie in Natchez's kleisli usage through Sttp's backends.
4 replies
From what I can see, I need to be able to convert between the two, like so:
def convertRequest[T, RF >: P with Effect[F], RG >: P with Effect[G]](
request: Request[T, RG]
): Request[T, RF]But I have no idea how I could accomplish that
Hi there, I'm running into issues using AsyncHttpClientZioBackend. I'm initiating it like that:
lazy val httpClientLayer: ULayer[Has[SttpBackend[Task, ZioStreams with capabilities.WebSockets]]] = {
ZLayer.fromAcquireRelease(AsyncHttpClientZioBackend())(_.close().ignore).orDie
}and giving it to my class using Zlayer. Unfortunately, I have requests that send me the error: IllegalStateException: Closed. I'm wondering if anyone had issues with this before. Thanks a lot in advance
1 reply
I have a strange low level exception ('IndexOutOfBoundsException') in 'backend.send(req)' which appears only on 1 out of ~100 endpoints . I'm clutching at straws with this bug and the my hipotesis is that moving from sttp 3.3.4 to 3.3.18 and upgrade of scalajs-dom to 2.0.0 is the differential "cause".
- sttp 3.3.4 compiled and linked with scalajs-dom 1.2 and there was no error.
- sttp 3.3.4 and scalajs-dom 2.0.0 it compiles but fails on linking. 3.3.18 and 2.0.0. it compiles and linkes but systematically fails in execution on 1 particular endpoint.
I'm using FetchMonixBackend and I see in the source code that it still uses 'import org.scalajs.dom.experimental...' which is no longer available in scalajs-dom 2.0.0
Is sttp compatible with scalajs-dom 2.0.0 ?
Any clues what can I check more ?
2 replies
in another. Is this likely to cause a problem?
4 replies
AkkaHttpBackend.usingActorSystem(actorSystem), actorSystem must be a classic actor system, not a typed one. Any hints how I can take my existing typed actor system and use it in AkkaHttpBackend.usingActorSystem?
2 replies
4 replies
I think there is an issue with release 3.4.1 of sttp for zio1.
https://github.com/softwaremill/sttp/blob/v3.4.1/build.sbt#L845 is using zio-json 0.3 which is targeting ZIO2
It should have been 0.2.0-M3 which is the latest release of zio-json for zio 1.
I've opened a PR https://github.com/softwaremill/sttp/pull/1318/files if anyone can have a looks that would be great. Thanks
1 reply
MaskedBodySerializer and use it in our wrapper backend. But when request reaches backend, its body already serialized to String. One way I see is to use tag for passing masked serialized body. Is there better approach?
2 replies
I'm using sttp client 3 with
HttpClientZioBackend and calling vk.com API.API methods have a
. in the name, for example https://api.vk.com/method/photos.getAll (query params omitted)When I call such a URI I get an error from the API which indicates that i have a problem with an API method.
However if I print url with
.show and open it in browser or print curl with .toCurl and run it in console or use synchronous HttpURLConnectionBackend or AsyncHttpClientZioBackend I get a successful response.I've also used HttpClient directly and reproduced the same problem.
Sure I've got
AsyncHttpClientZioBackend as a workaround, but wanted to use client with no extra dependencies, maybe someone knows how to overcome this problem.
1 reply
Hello, I am attempting to send requests via sttp3, however I am getting the following error: Cannot prove that Any with sttp.capabilities.Effect[[X]sttp.client3.Identity[X]] <:< Nothing.
I am sending the request as follows:
val api = DefaultApi.apply()
val backend = HttpURLConnectionBackend()
println(api.addProduct("Calculator").send(backend))where:
def addProduct(productName: String
): Request[Either[ResponseException[String, Exception], String], Nothing] =
basicRequest
.method(Method.POST, uri"$baseUrl/products/${productName}")
.contentType("application/json")
.response(asJson[String])Am I doing something wrong? Thanks!
6 replies
Any and not Nothing, otherwise the compiler will not be able to derive the correct effect (as Nothing is the bottom type)https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/softwaremill/sttp@177bb70974fbb2bb01aaeae592416743f63cba30/-/blob/core/src/main/scala/sttp/client3/RequestT.scala?L33
* @tparam R
* The backend capabilities required by the request or response description. This might be `Any` (no requirements),
* [[Effect]] (the backend must support the given effect type), [[Streams]] (the ability to send and receive
* streaming bodies) or [[sttp.capabilities.WebSockets]] (the ability to handle websocket requests).Hello everyone. The following code is generated using the openapi-generator:
def addRequiresConstraintToProduct(productName: String, sourceFeature: String, requiredFeature: String
): Request[Either[Either[String, String], Unit], Any] =
basicRequest
.method(Method.POST, uri"$baseUrl/products/${productName}/constraints/requires")
.contentType("multipart/form-data")
.multipartBody(Seq(
multipart("sourceFeature", sourceFeature)
,
multipart("requiredFeature", requiredFeature)
).flatten)
.response(asEither(asString, ignore))And it is giving the following error:
No implicit view available from sttp.model.Part[sttp.client3.BasicRequestBody] => scala.collection.IterableOnce[B]
).flatten)
^Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
8 replies
com.ocadotechnology.sttp.oauth2.common$OAuth2Exception: Client call resulted in error (200): expected json value got 'grant_...
val accessTokenProvider: AccessTokenProvider[Task] =
AccessTokenProvider[Task](uri"${tokenUrl}", NonEmptyString.unsafeFrom(clientId), Secret(secret))(sttpBackend)
(for {
token: ClientCredentialsToken.AccessTokenResponse <- accessTokenProvider.requestToken(scope)
} yield token.accessToken.value)
RequestT#logSettings that adds the tag. I expected that the logging backend wrapper would set this tag on every send, but I see no callers of this. What am I missing?
2 replies
Hello! I'm trying to upgrade some code from com.softwaremill.sttp. to sttp.client3., and looking for a way to deal with unsafeBody alternative.
for example,
url = "bad url" token = "bad token"
in softwaremill I did this:
response = Try(sttp.auth.bearer(token).get(uri"$urlStr").send.unsafeBody)
In this case response.isFailure = true
but sttp.client3 doesn't have this method:
response = basicRequest.auth.bearer(token).get(uri"$urlStr").send(backend).body
response match {
case Right(resp) => Try(resp)
case Left(error) =>
logger.error(s"API call failed: $error")
Try(error)
}
But in this case response would give an exception, which I don't need.
Does anyone have some thoughts to do this?
6 replies