Code of Conduct: https://github.com/solid/process/blob/main/code-of-conduct.md - Website: https://solidproject.org/ - Repos: https://github.com/solid/
@twainus_gitlab https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIKW_pyramid —> i owned wisdom.ai, which was intended to be a RWW/Solid App - that helped people curate their own Dynamic AI agents —> but couldn’t afford to renew the domain, indeed its been really financially hard being focused on this work for so long… anyhow. domain is now for sale: http://uniregistry.com/market/domain/wisdom.ai —> only $250k USD.
a list of schema tools is: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19IEgvdvwl_EOGhmIFinVQu4OerRojeje8PaZWGvoO4Q/edit#gid=0
knowledge has a few meanings https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/knowledge but i don’t think any of it relates to ‘fantasy’… https://www.nature.com/articles/438743a helps to describe "I suggest that in a simi- lar way, the distinction between reality and our knowledge of reality, between reality and information, cannot be made. There is no way to refer to reality without using the information we have about it.” as a meaningful concept that forms what i think in the similar field - is a distortion pattern, that degrades actual knowledge - to fantasy.. therein, it’s kinda important the web is self-archiving. https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://dig.csail.mit.edu/ doesn’t seem to me, to be the right way of going about it…
I think most of it stemmed from: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/ " He urges that men of science should then turn to the massive task of making more accessible our bewildering store of knowledge. For years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the powers of his mind. Trip hammers that multiply the fists, microscopes that sharpen the eye, and engines of destruction and detection are new results, but not the end results, of modern science. Now, says Dr. Bush, instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages.”
arguably the wealth distribution of the current, global knowledge economy, is worse than the fiet economy. some like google & facebook, have the knowledge of the world https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1bHmB8_f7ASRHm97TwhZmmEQnTKU
Whilst its been actively involved in feeding lies to people that we don’t know any more, what is true. our information management systems are dynamic.
I was thinking a bit more about the relationship between block chain and solid. And technically solid is very close to block chain. The concept of a block chain, which was originally called a time chain is an ordered set of files with headers and time stamps (so that files are ordered). That's exactly what an LDPC is, which is part of solid. In other words it's just like a folder with time stamps. The reason that time chain was renamed to block chain is that the folders became globally replicated, and it's really difficult to ensure that all the clocks are in sync, so time does not preserve order, but rather, a link to the previous file. Solid does not yet have a replication protocol, which is typical of block chains to allow no central authority, but that can be added. Public Block chains also tend to be immutable which is a property of the ACL, already built into solid.
So in summary, solid LDPCs are block chains in a technical sense; if you add a replication app, they will match what people traditionally think of block chain.
i can’t find the Web-DHT library, whilst noting, the objective outlined in HTTPA http://news.mit.edu/2014/whos-using-your-data-httpa-0613 (which from memory used bambooDHT? can’t remember). might help.
Imho - i’ve been thinking about social-encryption, and social-decentralisation. rules about how and what others can store of your data, kinda like a socially-augmented CDN.
so how might a did:solid scheme work?
Now your WebID, and important info, can be reconstructed even if your server goes down.