Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Jul 27 14:27
    justinwb commented #143
  • Jul 27 14:05
    elf-pavlik commented #143
  • Jul 26 15:46
    elf-pavlik commented #143
  • Jul 26 15:46
    elf-pavlik edited #143
  • Jul 26 15:45
    elf-pavlik edited #143
  • Jul 26 14:14
    TallTed commented #143
  • Jul 26 02:17
    elf-pavlik labeled #143
  • Jul 26 02:17
    elf-pavlik opened #143
  • Jul 26 01:59
    elf-pavlik assigned #136
  • Jul 20 19:57
    justinwb commented #142
  • Jul 20 19:54
    TallTed commented #142
  • Jul 20 19:42
    justinwb commented #142
  • Jul 20 17:32
    elf-pavlik edited #142
  • Jul 20 17:32
    elf-pavlik labeled #142
  • Jul 20 17:32
    elf-pavlik opened #142
  • Jul 20 14:38
    justinwb commented #140
  • Jul 20 14:32
    justinwb commented #91
  • Jul 20 14:23

    github-actions[bot] on gh-pages

    deploy: ff695463ff727f397861192… (compare)

  • Jul 20 14:22

    justinwb on main

    disable scripts for bob.example… separated grants acme -> alice separated grants omni -> alice and 6 more (compare)

  • Jul 20 14:22
    justinwb closed #141
Eric Prud'hommeaux
@ericprud
'cause that's what i use in shex-simple and if you peek at https://tinyurl.com/34ae9bwk , you'll see that the QueryMap accesses BASE and PREFIXes from the schema and DATA
without that, you just end up writing ShapePaths like "@http://a.example/schema/ProjectShape.http://a.exmaple/schema/hasMilestone"
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
So far we were hoping that we can just pass instances of DatasetCore https://rdf.js.org/dataset-spec/#datasetcore-interface which doesn't include any prefix information
Eric Prud'hommeaux
@ericprud
biab
Eric Prud'hommeaux
@ericprud
b
at some point, i think we should have a discussion of A. what usability environment do we want to aspire to and B., if it's different than today, how do we get there
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
Yesterday, while implementing InheritInstances Data Grant, I found very inconvenient how ldp:contains points to the resource and not its focus node. Actually I changed it to point to focus node https://github.com/solid/data-interoperability-panel/pull/130/files#diff-be21cbad4d5d3b9a5414aa3455ee8527d0d21ae6f0b625aecf1dab1688461281R14 but that's most likely incorrect use of ldp:contains
I would like to consider using a different property which can point to a focus node rather than just the document (if they differ)
hRicklefs
@hRicklefs
will be 30min late
Justin Bingham
@justinwb
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
@ericprud your mic is pretty bad
sai-js commit working over data from #130 elf-pavlik/sai-js@0cdb070
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
I'm already quite a bit ahead of currently open PR changing snippets in the primer https://github.com/elf-pavlik/data-interoperability-panel/compare/referenced-type...elf-pavlik:remote-grants?expand=1
We may need to fast-forward a bit during our next meeting
Justin Bingham
@justinwb
@elf-pavlik the outstanding PRs have been approved / merged
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik

@elf-pavlik the outstanding PRs have been approved / merged

Thank you! @justinwb

@ericprud I think you boradcast static noise
Justin Bingham
@justinwb
hRicklefs
@hRicklefs
q+ when do we expect the create* functions to run?
hRicklefs
@hRicklefs
have to drop off thanks for the summary on progress
change of plans :)
Justin Bingham
@justinwb
:slight_smile:
Justin Bingham
@justinwb
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
Let's discuss splitting the spec into Data Model and conformance classes specific specs https://github.com/solid/data-interoperability-panel/discussions/134
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
Which data grant scopes support creation of new instances? Given that all the remote scopes rely on other grants we probably can ignore them. AllInstances seems straight forward and it can support creating new instances. How about:
  • SelectedInstances - would we want to ever support creating new instances with this scope?
  • InheritInstances - probably the most interesting since here we never go through the data registrations and always through parent data instances, also if parent is one of remote data grants we don't have a reference(s) for data registrations of children.
We could take 5-10min for that tomorrow and followup on github.
hRicklefs
@hRicklefs
sorry all wont be able to join today
Justin Bingham
@justinwb

Hi @/all - given some movement and activity of late related to client/server notification protocols, the protocol editors have created an issue at solid/process#258 to gauge interest in re-establishing the notifications panel to advance proposals and implementation work:

Please see solid/process#258 and :+1: / :-1: / comment if you’re interested in participating.

elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
Let's try to make progress on #91 and #98
Eric Prud'hommeaux
@ericprud
hi all, a few of us (including justin) are in an NHS hackathon so we won't be able to make today's call.
propose to cancel
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
hi, thanks for heads-up :+1:
hRicklefs
@hRicklefs
sorry all cant make today
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
:wave: I created a hackmd with few suggestions for today's agenda https://hackmd.io/kiotbeyUTgqNyHwr9hA4WQ
justinwb @justinwb just wrapping prior meeting will be on in 5
hRicklefs
@hRicklefs
have to jump off now, see you next week
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
@justinwb what do you think about renaming DataRegistration to DataPartition? I got it from https://www.w3.org/TR/void/#class-property-partitions where Class Partition is something pretty close to our Data Registration
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
BTW do you have access to https://www.npmjs.com/org/solid ? I thought we could publish packages there as @solid/interop-*
Justin Bingham
@justinwb
yeah i have access to that - can discuss in session today
justinwb @justinwb letting partition marinate
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik
q+
q+ re authorization
elf Pavlik
@elf-pavlik