Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Jan 23 22:45
    elf-pavlik commented #197
  • Jan 23 16:25
    melvincarvalho commented #215
  • Jan 23 14:03
    melvincarvalho commented #215
  • Jan 23 14:03
    melvincarvalho commented #215
  • Jan 23 12:55
    melvincarvalho assigned #215
  • Jan 23 12:54
    melvincarvalho commented #215
  • Jan 23 11:42
    melvincarvalho review_requested #215
  • Jan 17 10:34
    kjetilk transferred #186
  • Jan 17 10:08
    kjetilk commented #193
  • Jan 17 02:12
    justinwb commented #193
  • Jan 16 12:45
    kjetilk commented #193
  • Jan 16 11:24
    csarven review_requested #215
  • Jan 16 10:29
    csarven review_requested #215
  • Jan 16 10:29
    csarven review_requested #215
  • Jan 16 10:29
    csarven review_requested #215
  • Jan 16 10:29
    csarven review_requested #215
  • Jan 16 10:29
    csarven opened #215
  • Jan 16 10:28

    csarven on current-status

    Added Publication Status Agree… (compare)

  • Jan 16 10:17
    kjetilk commented #193
  • Jan 16 09:47
    RubenVerborgh commented #193
Michiel de Jong
@michielbdejong
sorry that i hadn’t answered them earlier! :)
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
@namedgraph_twitter re https://gitter.im/solid/solid-spec?at=5d7ff6712e8fd94630e4817a , you're right but that doesn't mean that it can't be squatted for the time being :) ns/auth/acl is not necessarily "complete" by any sense or formally referred to in any W3C (or other) spec as far I'm aware. So, there is no reason why it can't be updated to include things like trustedApp or not. Whether trustedApp is a good/bad idea is a separate issue and we can address that through open discussion and implementation experience. Clearly there is some interest (a the very least) to know what's a "trusted" app. And the notion of "application" is not something entirely unique to Solid either. It is virtually everywhere. Again, we can discuss its semantics and what it all entails. Would you like to chime through the Solid panels? If you have technical concerns about it, it'd really valuable to know and have it documented so that we can have a better understanding.
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
@namedgraph_twitter If there isn't an issue for https://gitter.im/solid/solid-spec?at=5d7ff71b62bfc95112fe042e can you please create it? Perhaps in https://github.com/solid/process/blob/master/panels.md#app-authorization 's repo or https://github.com/solid/vocab is fine too I think.
Martynas Jusevicius
@namedgraph_twitter
@csarven my issue is that W3C had published the ACL long before there was Solid and now Solid acts as if it has authority over it
if it should be discussed, it should be on a W3C forum
not unilaterally on Solid's wiki
and i'm pretty confident that while the ACL terms are widely used, Solid-introduced ones such as trustedApp are not, because they address much more specific, and likely orthogonal issue, than the ACL terms
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
@namedgraph_twitter I don't believe "Solid" has authority over it. W3C (Team) or any group (usually WG, CG, but not strictly!) coordinating with them can probably update the ns. It is used out there I suppose but I would suspect that people are trusting it as they do with any other ns under w3.org. That is, things can change.
Like I said, trustedApp can find a home, but please raise it somewhere so it is properly tracked. Discussing it in chats is not going to change anything.
And the the term being squatting for the time being has no official stance whatsoever. The ACL vocab does not currently contain traustedApp so I wouldn't worry about it.
Aside: I don't think "trustedApp" is so far out that it doesn't belong in the ACL vocab either. I've seen worse.
Martynas Jusevicius
@namedgraph_twitter
so what do you propose i change?
i can do a PR for the web-access-control-spec re. trustedApp namespace
but i'm not gonna look for and replace all its usages
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
I'd suggest to first make an issue and outline the case. Give others a chance to respond and move the discussion forward. If need be, PR can follow that.
Arne Hassel
@megoth_twitter
I think it's important to note that acl:trustedApp was merely intended as an interim solution for Solid - uncertain that we need to spec it in the long term...
Michiel de Jong
@michielbdejong
Jordan Shurmer
@JordanShurmer
it's still true that every Solid server is an LDP server right? I.e. part of implementing solid is implementing LDP?
hmm, I'll move this to the new chat room :D
Michiel de Jong
@michielbdejong
@JordanShurmer only the BasicContainer part of LDP, not the other two container types
Jordan Shurmer
@JordanShurmer
:thumbsup: thanks
Mike Adams
@mikeadams1
@JordanShurmer our brains may be soft wired because I have been working on warp for the past three hours
Mike Adams
@mikeadams1
Warp is a great app
Jordan Shurmer
@JordanShurmer
warp?
I am going to pimp it out a little, if thats even possible but, I think I can.
Mike Adams
@mikeadams1
@timbl suggested that maybe we should be looking at combining apps to make things. That is what I am trying to do.
take a piece from here and a piece from there, that sort of thing so, it requires me to become familiar with almost everything working with solid currently.
Mike Adams
@mikeadams1
I am thinking that there are several apps I would like to use from one location, so Iframe's really make great use of combining applications in one place. Something like https://index.inrupt.net/
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
@JordanShurmer re https://gitter.im/solid/solid-spec?at=5daf9ff914d55a37855abf5d , LDP describes behaviour for the most part optional. Solid will set specific constraints and clarify or strengthen the requirements from LDP. For example, LDP doesn't require any specific type of container to be implemented however it prescribes how they should behave if adopted. See also solid/specification#47 for containers for the upcoming Solid spec.
Jordan Shurmer
@JordanShurmer
thanks, makes sense
DJ Tinkers
@TinkersDj_twitter
SOLID as in that no dependency thingy?

Anyone interested in an opensource project?

Spec oriented development speeds up programming by generating code based on tests/specs. Tests required will be the same or less specs as a normal developer writes.

https://github.com/Neur0plasticity/spec-dev

MSG me if interested