Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Jan 14 13:58

    RubenVerborgh on websockets-version-format

    (compare)

  • Jan 14 13:58

    RubenVerborgh on master

    Remove slash from version numbe… Drop alpha from version number.… Replace warning by explanation.… and 1 more (compare)

  • Jan 14 13:58
    RubenVerborgh closed #230
  • Jan 14 13:58
    RubenVerborgh closed #221
  • Jan 13 20:37
    WhyINeedToFillUsername commented #230
  • Jan 04 02:47
    ewingson commented #221
  • Jan 01 22:15
    scenaristeur commented #221
  • Jan 01 22:15
    scenaristeur commented #221
  • Jan 01 22:10
    scenaristeur commented #221
  • Jan 01 20:05
    bourgeoa commented #221
  • Jan 01 16:48
    scenaristeur commented #221
  • Dec 09 2020 16:16
    TallTed commented #209
  • Dec 09 2020 15:54
    michielbdejong closed #193
  • Dec 09 2020 15:53
    michielbdejong closed #209
  • Dec 09 2020 15:53
    michielbdejong closed #192
  • Dec 09 2020 15:51
    michielbdejong closed #191
  • Dec 09 2020 15:51
    michielbdejong closed #179
  • Oct 02 2020 12:28
    Potherca opened #231
  • Sep 11 2020 06:27
    csarven transferred #195
  • Sep 10 2020 17:07
    csarven commented #195
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
I'd suggest to first make an issue and outline the case. Give others a chance to respond and move the discussion forward. If need be, PR can follow that.
Arne Hassel
@megoth_twitter
I think it's important to note that acl:trustedApp was merely intended as an interim solution for Solid - uncertain that we need to spec it in the long term...
Michiel de Jong
@michielbdejong
Jordan Shurmer
@JordanShurmer
it's still true that every Solid server is an LDP server right? I.e. part of implementing solid is implementing LDP?
hmm, I'll move this to the new chat room :D
Michiel de Jong
@michielbdejong
@JordanShurmer only the BasicContainer part of LDP, not the other two container types
Jordan Shurmer
@JordanShurmer
:thumbsup: thanks
Mike Adams
@mikeadams1
@JordanShurmer our brains may be soft wired because I have been working on warp for the past three hours
Mike Adams
@mikeadams1
Warp is a great app
Jordan Shurmer
@JordanShurmer
warp?
I am going to pimp it out a little, if thats even possible but, I think I can.
Mike Adams
@mikeadams1
@timbl suggested that maybe we should be looking at combining apps to make things. That is what I am trying to do.
take a piece from here and a piece from there, that sort of thing so, it requires me to become familiar with almost everything working with solid currently.
Mike Adams
@mikeadams1
I am thinking that there are several apps I would like to use from one location, so Iframe's really make great use of combining applications in one place. Something like https://index.inrupt.net/
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
@JordanShurmer re https://gitter.im/solid/solid-spec?at=5daf9ff914d55a37855abf5d , LDP describes behaviour for the most part optional. Solid will set specific constraints and clarify or strengthen the requirements from LDP. For example, LDP doesn't require any specific type of container to be implemented however it prescribes how they should behave if adopted. See also solid/specification#47 for containers for the upcoming Solid spec.
Jordan Shurmer
@JordanShurmer
thanks, makes sense
DJ Tinkers
@TinkersDj_twitter
SOLID as in that no dependency thingy?

Anyone interested in an opensource project?

Spec oriented development speeds up programming by generating code based on tests/specs. Tests required will be the same or less specs as a normal developer writes.

https://github.com/Neur0plasticity/spec-dev

MSG me if interested

Eureka Chen
@EurekaChen
What is the relationship between webid and did(https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/)?
What is the relationship between webid and did(https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/ )?
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
@EurekaChen This channel is no longer in use. We are over at https://gitter.im/solid/specification . See also solid/identity-panel#1
Eureka Chen
@EurekaChen
ok,thank you!
Noel De Martin
@NoelDeMartin
I've been looking at the spec repos and I found this comment https://github.com/solid/solid-spec/issues/159#issuecomment-488292554
Node-Solid-Server also implements n3-patch which seems to be different from RDF patch, and relies on http://www.w3.org/ns/solid/terms#inserts, http://www.w3.org/ns/solid/terms#deletes, and http://www.w3.org/ns/solid/terms#where which seems pretty custom and undocumented?
Is it safe for a client to rely on that? Or is that just a node-solid-server thing?
Tim Berners-Lee
@timbl
It’s a NSS thing at the moment. The plan is to a) implement N3 patch, b) send patches up the web socket instead of pub pings with no data; c) open up the client to peer to peer configurations like mesh configurations and CRDT and stuff. N3 patches anyone can parse and add more data to.
Would love it if someone did it but it is research level or someday pile at this stage on the roadmap.