kjetilk on sparql-update-complex-semaphore
Merge branch 'feature/sparql-up… Add that it should not produce … fix ids and 4 more (compare)
csarven on main
2021-10-20 meeting minutes (compare)
csarven on main
2021-10-27 meeting agenda (compare)
If the URI owner has provided more than one representation (in different formats such as HTML, PNG, or RDF; in different languages such as English and Spanish; or transformed dynamically according to the hardware or software capabilities of the recipient), the resulting representation may depend on negotiation between the user agent and server.
http://www.w3.org/ns/solid/termsis still in use by Solid servers and applications. It is also mentioned in the Solid ecosystem document: https://solid.github.io/specification/#namespaces and used in examples in the spec.
well, RDF representation of PNG is RDF, so you would get what you ask for
Exactly, that's why I don't want to ask for it :) I don't actually want content in a particular format, I want to know what type of content it is (i.e. RDF or not). But I guess this gets particularly problematic when parts of a Resource are RDF and parts aren't :/
@gatemezing Did we already talk about LOV having an inbox to receive notifications about new vocabs or updates to existing ones. You can have a shape for the notification so that can work as a way to register vocabs in LOV
Not yet, but happy to start that discussion - TIA. We just use a "basic bot" for checking some metadata for updates in a vocab and email notification when someone submit a new vocab. BTW, it would be great to have more metadata in the Solid vocab.