kjetilk on sparql-update
Simplify the BNF Reintroduce DeleteWhere Update change count and 2 more (compare)
csarven on main
kjetilk on sparql-update-simplify
Add overview section, link Yack… (compare)
<WebID>as a Class... and wrote "an Agent" to hint at the class.. a person, an org.. a software agent.. as the definition of solid:account says "A solid account belonging to an Agent." .. so, yes, foaf:Agent, schema:SoftwareAgent, vCard:WebId fits.
:point_up: January 4, 2021 9:43 PM
Zero: Stop thinking in terms of LDP
Btw. I think one should not stop thinking it terms of LDP, rather think in terms of refinements of LDP. There's a lot of work that went into LDP (5 years with major players, a test suite and a spec) and we should not dismiss that work.
Those points by @acoburn show Solid be an extension of LDP. (And one of those points I would say needs to be very carefully phrased as it could be problematic.)
We have a problem that we have dropped solud discovery it seems. It is the first client-client spec so in a wag the most urgent after the solid protocol. We have chat apps and contacts stuff which uses the type indexes to find chats and address books etc through the type indexes and that spec is small but important.
discovery is included in draft from interoperability panel, especially:
both aim to take into account access control in process of data discovery
We have chat apps and contacts stuff which uses the type indexes to find chats and address books etc through the type indexes
I thought it refers to https://github.com/solid/solid/blob/master/proposals/data-discovery.md#type-index-registry
From the description of a Data Registry:
A Data Registry can be used for basic discovery, but it is not designed nor intended to be an efficient means to query or index data. However, it is intended to be used as reliable source data for different query engines or indexing schemes.
<img src="..." height="100" width="...">code. This is part of the github raw html extensions capability. It does not actually give an example with img size. But I found an issue jgm/pandoc#2554 and I have tried it previously on some other markdown pages of github.