csarven on w3c-solid-cg-weekly
Add W3C Solid CG weekly meeting… (compare)
Registration of an identity, registration of a pod, > 1 Pod per identity, moving a pod to another provider, changing owner of a Pod, making sure no links are broken. There are all related.
I couldn't find any terms related to Pod ownership. It is already a problem in the upcomming ACP spec: solid/authorization-panel#171
And I was thinking such terms could pave the way forward to standardising Pod registration/provisioning/transfer...
I didn't find a whole lot that seems relevant on the Solid GitHub org either: https://github.com/search?q=org%3Asolid+pod+owner&type=issues
@csarven is it something that makes sense and what would be the best platform to discuss and/or bring it up?
<http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#owner> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property> . <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#owner> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment> "The person or other agent which owns this.\n For example, the owner of a file in a filesystem.\n There is a sense of right to control. Typically defaults to the agent who craeted\n something but can be changed." . <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#owner> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label> "owner"@en . <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#owner> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent> .
solid:WebIDwould not be a better fit as range of an owner property or as domain of
solid:oidcIssuerinstead of a
vcard:Agentwhich might have a
@matthieubosquet If of interest: https://github.com/solid/specification/issues/153#issuecomment-616464435 , https://gitter.im/solid/chat?at=59f890fce44c43700a9dc81f or see links in https://github.com/solid/contacts-pane/issues/18#issuecomment-725963009 .
As long as the needs are well documented and specs are referring to them, all fine. Not sure about a webid Class but can probably get more out of a property.
I'm not opposed to "podOwner" property or "Pod" class -- and which namespace is to throw it under is the least of concerns IMO -- but I'd like to hear more from people about what they think/expect with the differences are with root container (pim:Storage) or maybe even server origin or root URI path..
re "controller" or "owner" etc .. see links above. Plenty of existing discussion in chats/issues.. not worth repeating here unless there is some new information. tl;dr: both are fine as synonyms but can obviously differ in their meaning and purpose. Don't forget to throw in "creator" or "admin" or "authority" for fun and profit.