Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
    vinit patel
    @vinit_r_patel_twitter
    Thank you. I could see several java files with "$" suffix in the "/target/geneated-source/annotation/ " folder. So, it did generate the classes. Now I need to figure out why the IDE is still complaining. Thank you for giving me some hints.
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    Oftentimes there is a command for setting the root for generated classes in IDEs.
    So the annotation processor works. That is usually the hard part. Good news.
    vinit patel
    @vinit_r_patel_twitter
    Thank you. I will check it out.
    Partha Nath
    @ParthaNath28
    Hello. I have tried to get a count of all records from database by using the following snippet.
    return jpaStreamer.stream(Entity.class).count();
    This is returning count as 1
    but when I fire a query like return jpaStreamer.stream(Entity.class).toList().stream().count(); it is taking almost 5 minutes to bring back a count of 200 thousand records.
    Is there an efficient way of getting the count without waiting for such an enormous time? Thanks
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    Hi. return jpaStreamer.stream(Entity.class).count() is the way to go. If you enable logging of SQL querries, what do you see then?
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    I think that looks as expected. If you cut and paste that code into an SQL tool, what result do you get?
    WHsat database type are you using?
    Partha Nath
    @ParthaNath28
    oracle
    the query works fine
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    But you always get “1” as a result?
    When using the stream?
    Partha Nath
    @ParthaNath28
    By using the stream I am getting the correct number but it takes an enormous amount of time.
    3 minutes
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    I mean, if you are using jpaStreamer.stream(Entity.class).count();
    Was the SQL dump from when you used the command jpaStreamer.stream(Entity.class).count();?
    Partha Nath
    @ParthaNath28
    jpaStreamer.stream(Entity.class).count()
    image.png
    I have pasted the screenshot
    from my intellij debugger window.
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    ok. And the SQL dump when you run that stream is?
    Partha Nath
    @ParthaNath28
    yes
    The one I pasted above
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    ok
    Strange. I will have to file an issue to verify this.
    Partha Nath
    @ParthaNath28
    ok
    thanks.
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    speedment/jpa-streamer#244
    Please add any extra information you can think of.
    (the issue is public)
    As a work-around, you could add a predicate that is always true in the stream pipeline using .filter() and see if that solves the problem (another renderer will be used in this case).
    .filter($Person.name.notEquals(“71287618717187hdvahashv”))
    Partha Nath
    @ParthaNath28
    ok
    thanks
    Partha Nath
    @ParthaNath28
    sorry this did not work either
    the sql is generated fine and giving correct record count
    but from java its still 1
    return jpaStreamer.stream(Entity.class)
    .filter(Entity$.primaryKeyIdentifier.isNotNull())
    .count();
    I tried this one
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    ok. Let’s wait for the issue to get examined.
    Thanks
    vinit patel
    @vinit_r_patel_twitter
    Hi Per-Ake, I had reported an issue last week regarding my Eclipse based Spring STS IDE could not detect the generated class even though they got generated and compiled successfully. Finally, I figured out that Eclipse based IDE does not like a file name ending with "$". If I rename the file name by replacing "$" with "", the IDE does recognize it. Is there any way to generate the source file with "" suffix instead of "$"?
    Per Minborg
    @minborg
    Ooops. Accoding to the Java Language Specification, a class can end with “_” and “$”. This must be a bug in Spring STS IDE/
    There is no way to replace the “$” (easilly). JPA is using “_” for its typed fields.
    (metadata)
    Ghost
    @ghost~62da6df56da03739849a62de
    Hey, is it possible to efficiently stream blobs or huge (byte) arrays instead of loading them completely into memory with this?