Add don't forget different fa- icons
And here I was, wondering how many people would even use the Excel export :smile:
I do not have time to create anything like this in the near future, so if you think that you can create the functionality, you're welcome @ksn135 :)
Maybe first open an issue, so that we can discuss
@sescandell I'm having a problem with the admingenerator relying on the iCheck dependency, which I do not use. It's about two rules in our
main.js file: main.js#L79 & main.js#L109.
On line 79, we can simply change the
on('ifChecked ifUnchecked' to on( 'change', but I'm not sure if the .iCheck('update') is needed
Guess I can also make an check for it
Does anyone have any success stories with Zigbee? I realize it's more popular here in the US vs Europe but the sensors are generally cheaper than Z-wave. I'm particularly interested in this model as it appears to be the same chipset used by SmartThings (which I currently have) - the ZM357S-USB-LR http://www.cel.com/pdf/datasheets/EM357_USB_Sticks_DS.pdf . Right now I'm using the smartthings mqtt integration with HA which is great but eventually want to migrate off of it (and the cloud). Thanks.
Hi, i've changed https://github.com/calvera/symfony2-admingenerator-demo-edition/blob/modals/src/Admingenerator/DoctrineOrmDemoBundle/Controller/Post/ActionsController.php#L26 to allow using modal for example simpleedit action. Now the form is binded and validation works... please comment my approach
what am i miss ?
Take a look at our documentation: https://github.com/symfony2admingenerator/GeneratorBundle/blob/master/Resources/doc/customization/templates.md
Everything to know can be found there
by the way, i followed the same overwriting schema like th GeneratorBundle
On the homepage of the bundle, you can see that you need to add the file to your own template. Simply put another, you won't have the need to overwrite it
Is it possible to override *.php.twig file that generates base template? (e.g. Resources/templates/CommonAdmin/ListTemplate/scopes.php.twig)
@ksn135 I'm against default injection of services in form types (or do you mean anything else?). And you already have the authorization checker in the form right? Personally, I extended that to get everything I need (like tokens, persons from tokens)
But as I said, you might want to extend the authorization checker, I personally find that very handy :)