Sbt went from 0.13.x => 1.0.x => 1.1.x etc. So in short that's not a problem.
I did start to look at calculating the exact figure.
@Rich2 id' have a look at box-sizing https://css-tricks.com/box-sizing which can make layouts easier and a lot more intuitive
@Rich2 been looking at how a bolnur-katskhuri cross could be constructed
i was thinking along the lines of:
do you reckon this is the best way to approach it?
cheers
i was thinking along the lines of:
Shape(LineSeg(5 vv 5), ArcSeg(110 vv 0, 10 vv 18), ArcSeg(0 vv 71, -10 vv 18), ArcSeg(-110 vv 0, -10 vv 18), LineSeg(-5 vv 5)).fill(Black)do you reckon this is the best way to approach it?
cheers
Its the same as multiplying and adding ordinary numbers. the operations are performed in order
val v1 = Vec2(2.0, 4.0)
val v2a = v1.scale(0.125) // Vec2(0.25, 0.5)
val v3a = v2a.addXY(0, 1) // Vec2(0.25, 1.5)
val v2b = v1.addXY(0, 1) // Vec2(2.0, 5.0)
val v3b = v2b.scale(0.125) // Vec2(0.25, 0.625)So order of transformations matters. Probably good to put that in docs, possibly in more than one place.
It doesn't matter when you do the fill.
@Rich2 great - thanks for that
btw ellipses are preserved under affine transformations (parallel line stay parallel: translation, scaling, reflection, rotation, shear etc) both jfx & html canvas have ellipses but you have to draw the whole thing..
the last part is a wrong-un! - you can draw a part of an ellipse on the HTML Canvas & javaFx :)
@Rich2 im close to starting work on Arc's - just need to write converter for quadratic bezier to cubic bezier now.
i came across this Another approach, used by modern hardware graphics adapters with accelerated geometry, can convert exactly all Bézier and conic curves (or surfaces){w0d: eg arcs} into NURBS, that can be rendered incrementally without first splitting the curve recursively to reach the necessary flatness condition. This approach also allows preserving the curve definition under all linear or perspective 2D and 3D transforms and projections which i thought would be of interest
i came across this Another approach, used by modern hardware graphics adapters with accelerated geometry, can convert exactly all Bézier and conic curves (or surfaces){w0d: eg arcs} into NURBS, that can be rendered incrementally without first splitting the curve recursively to reach the necessary flatness condition. This approach also allows preserving the curve definition under all linear or perspective 2D and 3D transforms and projections which i thought would be of interest
And if you can think of a better method name.
@Rich2 its certainly useful to have for some shapes for some people, i was happy with the test against the boundingRect, but some shapes may require a little more effort to flesh out so i can image your time possibly being spent better elsewhere atm, re: name - i like my func():bool names to begin with 'is' but..