Where communities thrive

Join over 1.5M+ people
Join over 100K+ communities
Free without limits
Create your own community

Explore more communities

unfiltered/unfiltered

People

Repo info

Activity

Aug 02 01:12

xuwei-k closed #864
Jul 31 22:13

xuwei-k converted_to_draft #864
Jul 31 22:12

xuwei-k on 0.11.x

(compare)
Jul 31 22:12

xuwei-k closed #863
Jul 31 22:12

xuwei-k on 0.11.x

Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)
Jul 31 22:12

xuwei-k on main

Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)
Jul 31 22:12

xuwei-k on main

(compare)
Jul 31 22:12

xuwei-k closed #862
Jul 31 16:05

unfiltered-app[bot] review_requested #864
Jul 31 16:05

unfiltered-app[bot] opened #864
Jul 31 16:05

unfiltered-app[bot] on 0.10.x

Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)
Jul 31 16:05

unfiltered-app[bot] review_requested #863
Jul 31 16:05

unfiltered-app[bot] opened #863
Jul 31 16:05

unfiltered-app[bot] on 0.11.x

Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)
Jul 31 16:05

unfiltered-app[bot] review_requested #862
Jul 31 16:05

unfiltered-app[bot] opened #862
Jul 31 16:05

unfiltered-app[bot] on main

Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)
Jul 12 10:09

xuwei-k on 0.11.x

(compare)
Jul 12 10:09

xuwei-k on 0.11.x

Update sbt to 1.7.1 in 0.11.x (compare)
Jul 12 10:09

xuwei-k closed #859

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

Looks like Scala 2.12.1 improved unfiltered performance by like 5% (from 2.12.0)

Not bad

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

there's something wrong with the git repo

monolith:unfiltered-upstream omar$ git fsck
Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done.
warning in tree b6b13d748be80f1d389113648b1e12baf723374d: zeroPaddedFilemode: contains zero-padded file modes
warning in tree ddc9d5e60574c8328e015dc17e7b67644c8bfc7c: zeroPaddedFilemode: contains zero-padded file modes
Checking objects: 100% (19775/19775), done.

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

i was trying to import it into something that uses jgit :)

it's due to a bug in an old version of git

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

We need to allow netty users to specify a EventExecutorGroup

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16046283/netty-4-code-to-run-blocking-operations-in-thread-pool

unfiltered/unfiltered#362

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

I'm running 0.9.0-beta2 on 33% of production servers at RTM :)

looks good so far

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

Just wanted to update and say it's now on 100% of production servers. No issues. :+1:

kenji yoshida

@xuwei-k

:tada:

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

can someone take a look at #369 ?

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

any chance we can release a beta3? mostly to pick up the new netty

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

Any reason we shouldnt go to 0.9.0 now?

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

i've been running this in production for more than a month, zero issues

so let's do 0.9.0 if @xuwei-k agrees

kenji yoshida

@xuwei-k

:+1:

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

should we also change the main branch to 0.9.x or something? Dont really see the point of having branches per minor release

we can do that after the release

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

yeah it makes no sense

yes please

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

if no objections, i’ll build and publish 0.9.0 from commit id: a068ffba4a76a594e81c91e22f8a5587490fdbe6

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

Yup

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

Released

I changed the default branch to 0.9.x

if we rather want master, then I’m all for

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

meh. stupid erratic failing test

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

Someone™ should look into that

kivi

@kivi

Can someone show me some examples, where unfiltered is using a jar file and serves the methods as GET/POST?

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

is there a reason for this

remote: error: GH006: Protected branch update failed for refs/heads/0.9.x.
remote: error: Required status check "continuous-integration/travis-ci" is expected.
To github.com:unfiltered/unfiltered.git
 ! [remote rejected] 0.9.x -> 0.9.x (protected branch hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to 'git@github.com:unfiltered/unfiltered.git'

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

anyway

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

any chance we can do a new release to get the netty change in?

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

it would be really great if we somehow could allow people to enable SO_REUSEPORT for netty

but the definition is only in

transport-native-epoll/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/epoll/EpollChannelOption.java
27:    public static final ChannelOption<Boolean> SO_REUSEPORT = valueOf(EpollChannelOption.class, "SO_REUSEPORT")

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

I dont really have time do another release until next week

if anyone else wants to, be my guest

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

any chance you can detail the release steps

so we can do releases too?

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

is it just 'sbt publish'? :D

do we need to use the same pgp keys?

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

I'll try to jot down the steps tomorrow.

no need in using the same pgp-keys.

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

should we release with those changes? I have time to get this done now.

Omar Kilani

@omarkilani

Yes please

Erlend Hamnaberg

@hamnis

Take it for a spin: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/wsunfiltered-1004