Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Aug 02 01:12
    xuwei-k closed #864
  • Jul 31 22:13
    xuwei-k converted_to_draft #864
  • Jul 31 22:12

    xuwei-k on 0.11.x

    (compare)

  • Jul 31 22:12
    xuwei-k closed #863
  • Jul 31 22:12

    xuwei-k on 0.11.x

    Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)

  • Jul 31 22:12

    xuwei-k on main

    Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)

  • Jul 31 22:12

    xuwei-k on main

    (compare)

  • Jul 31 22:12
    xuwei-k closed #862
  • Jul 31 16:05
    unfiltered-app[bot] review_requested #864
  • Jul 31 16:05
    unfiltered-app[bot] opened #864
  • Jul 31 16:05

    unfiltered-app[bot] on 0.10.x

    Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)

  • Jul 31 16:05
    unfiltered-app[bot] review_requested #863
  • Jul 31 16:05
    unfiltered-app[bot] opened #863
  • Jul 31 16:05

    unfiltered-app[bot] on 0.11.x

    Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)

  • Jul 31 16:05
    unfiltered-app[bot] review_requested #862
  • Jul 31 16:05
    unfiltered-app[bot] opened #862
  • Jul 31 16:05

    unfiltered-app[bot] on main

    Update scalatest, scalatest-cor… (compare)

  • Jul 12 10:09

    xuwei-k on 0.11.x

    (compare)

  • Jul 12 10:09

    xuwei-k on 0.11.x

    Update sbt to 1.7.1 in 0.11.x (compare)

  • Jul 12 10:09
    xuwei-k closed #859
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
it's due to a bug in an old version of git
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
We need to allow netty users to specify a EventExecutorGroup
unfiltered/unfiltered#362
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
I'm running 0.9.0-beta2 on 33% of production servers at RTM :)
looks good so far
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
Just wanted to update and say it's now on 100% of production servers. No issues. :+1:
kenji yoshida
@xuwei-k
:tada:
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
can someone take a look at #369 ?
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
any chance we can release a beta3? mostly to pick up the new netty
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
Any reason we shouldnt go to 0.9.0 now?
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
no
i've been running this in production for more than a month, zero issues
so let's do 0.9.0 if @xuwei-k agrees
kenji yoshida
@xuwei-k
:+1:
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
should we also change the main branch to 0.9.x or something? Dont really see the point of having branches per minor release
we can do that after the release
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
yeah it makes no sense
yes please
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
if no objections, i’ll build and publish 0.9.0 from commit id: a068ffba4a76a594e81c91e22f8a5587490fdbe6
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
Yup
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
Released
I changed the default branch to 0.9.x
if we rather want master, then I’m all for
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
meh. stupid erratic failing test
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
Someone™ should look into that
kivi
@kivi
Can someone show me some examples, where unfiltered is using a jar file and serves the methods as GET/POST?
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
is there a reason for this
remote: error: GH006: Protected branch update failed for refs/heads/0.9.x. remote: error: Required status check "continuous-integration/travis-ci" is expected. To github.com:unfiltered/unfiltered.git ! [remote rejected] 0.9.x -> 0.9.x (protected branch hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'git@github.com:unfiltered/unfiltered.git'
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
anyway
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
any chance we can do a new release to get the netty change in?
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
it would be really great if we somehow could allow people to enable SO_REUSEPORT for netty
but the definition is only in transport-native-epoll/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/epoll/EpollChannelOption.java 27: public static final ChannelOption<Boolean> SO_REUSEPORT = valueOf(EpollChannelOption.class, "SO_REUSEPORT")
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
I dont really have time do another release until next week
if anyone else wants to, be my guest
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
any chance you can detail the release steps
so we can do releases too?
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
is it just 'sbt publish'? :D
do we need to use the same pgp keys?
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
I'll try to jot down the steps tomorrow.
no need in using the same pgp-keys.
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
k
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
should we release with those changes? I have time to get this done now.
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
Yes please
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
will push this tomorrow morning if no issues are discovered
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
seems fine to me, did you do any commits for that -- i dont see them on gh
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
not pushed yet
Erlend Hamnaberg
@hamnis
its pushed now
Omar Kilani
@omarkilani
K