Where communities thrive

Join over 1.5M+ people
Join over 100K+ communities
Free without limits
Create your own community

Explore more communities

webdriverio/webdriverio

A Node.js bindings implementation for the W3C WebDriver protocol

People

Repo info

Activity

Jul 05 19:47

christian-bromann on master

Added Novus Visual Regression S… (compare)
Jul 05 19:47

christian-bromann closed #5570
Jul 05 19:47

christian-bromann labeled #5570
Jul 05 17:49

Jnegrier review_requested #5570
Jul 05 17:49

Jnegrier commented #5570
Jul 05 17:47

Jnegrier synchronize #5570
Jul 05 14:41

codecov[bot] commented #3708
Jul 05 14:41

codecov[bot] commented #3148
Jul 05 14:41

jsf-clabot commented #5404
Jul 05 14:41

jsf-clabot commented #5570
Jul 05 14:39

jsf-clabot commented #5570
Jul 05 14:39

Jnegrier opened #5570
Jul 05 14:34

SrinivasanTarget synchronize #5566
Jul 05 14:06

sam-022 commented #5569
Jul 05 08:24

wswebcreation closed #5569
Jul 05 08:24

wswebcreation commented #5569
Jul 05 01:08

sam-022 edited #5569
Jul 04 23:28

sam-022 opened #5569
Jul 04 16:10

christian-bromann labeled #5568
Jul 04 16:10

christian-bromann labeled #5568

Christian Bromann

@christian-bromann

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp just define multiple capabilities in your conf file

currently it is unfortunatelly one process per capability. In future it will be one process per capability per test spec

slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@christian-bromann Thanks! Any guess on when this would be possible? Meanwhile, Is there a way to assign each capability a different set of specs (even a dirty way?)

(but ideally not so dirty that it require to break the source of specs manually :) )

perhaps, 5 capabilities each assigned index 0-4, each executing only testSpec which testSpecIndex % x = 0

Dan Dascalescu

@dandv

webdriver-sync has a really nice syntax - https://github.com/jsdevel/webdriver-sync#in-favor-of-this. How close can WebdriverIO get to sync? Is there an example somewhere?

Christian Bromann

@christian-bromann

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp not yet unfortunatelly .. dirty way would be to fork the project and hack a temporary solution

currently I am not able to spend much time doing open source but this will change in 2 weeks, there is a lot of stuff to catch up with

@dandv I was experimenting with fibers to get sync in webdriverio .. got it working for protocol commands but not for nested commands, definitelly something I wanna add to webdriverio

but this is kinda possible already today using yield

e.g.
expect(yield browser.getTitle()).to.be.equal(“something”);

Dan Dascalescu

@dandv

Thanks. And last question for today: what's the easiest way to get started with WebdriverIO and Cucumber? Still https://github.com/webdriverio/cucumber-boilerplate?

slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@christian-bromann Thanks. I did consider forking. If I embarked on that quest, a noob node.js, or specifically npm question: how easy is it for the wdio package to come from my fork in my project? Is it a matter of changing one url?

Christian Bromann

@christian-bromann

I would use the wdio test runner and maybe port all these snippets over

@dandv ^^^

cucumber-boilerplate is still a good start though

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp in your package.json just grab your fork

”webdriverio”: "slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp/webdriverio”

slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

awesome

slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

another noob node/npm question. Everywhere I see people running 'wdio wdio.conf.js' but I get ''wdio' is not recognized as an internal or external command'. Is it because everyone installs wdio globally?
asd

I need to have the thing self contained, so I don't want it to pollute the machine globally. The only thing I have global is node. Keeping that in mind, is doing 'node_modules.bin\wdio wdio.conf.js' is the easiest way to run?

Christian Bromann

@christian-bromann

right .. but you can also call it like ./node_modules/.bin/wdio wdio.conf.js

yeah

slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

ah, ok, I just came up with that myself, so needed to make sure I'm doing the right thing

thanks

Bitcollage

@SerkanSipahi

I believe the documentation for "http://www.webdriver.io/api.html" is changed !

We use webdriverio 2.4.5

our commands look like this

js
        browser.click(element, function(err) {
                        //....
        })

but now i see every call has a then after every call..

what is changed from v2 to v3?

any changelog there?

i found the changelog: https://github.com/webdriverio/webdriverio/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md :)

well, is documentation changed?

from V2 to V3?

csoete

@csoete

Its promise based instead of callback based.

But for most parts you can do both I think.

Bitcollage

@SerkanSipahi

ok thanks

we want to move to v3

is v3 callback based, too?

csoete

@csoete

check out http://webdriver.io/guide/getstarted/v3.html

Bitcollage

@SerkanSipahi

@csoete thank you ...

slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

How do I set timeoutsImplicitWait only once per tests run, i.e. in onPrepare? I can see that the global browser object does not exist there yet?

Christian Bromann

@christian-bromann

just set it in your before hook

the browser object will be available there

slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@christian-bromann Doing it per every test seems redundant. Maybe worth having a 'onBrowserReady' event. Thanks though!

Christian Bromann

@christian-bromann

you definitely need to set it once per session..the before hook gets executed after a session was created, so there should be no redundancy at all

with before hook I am talking about the one in your wdio.conf

slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

@slawomir-brzezinski-at-travcorp

yes, but doesn't it run per every test or so?

perhaps I interpret it wrong, maybe it's indeed exactly what I need