WireMock.Net is a flexible library for stubbing and mocking web HTTP responses using requests matching criteria.
Unfortunately, it doesn't help.
In debug mode, I see in LogEntriesChanged that response from the original server was received with correct status and headers: https://clip2net.com/s/453azgO
But it seems, that Chrome can't get it. =(
In debug mode, I see in LogEntriesChanged that response from the original server was received with correct status and headers: https://clip2net.com/s/453azgO
But it seems, that Chrome can't get it. =(
I have small problem with WireMock to configure it as partial proxy.
It seems that WithProxy() accept only base url to which then queryString from request is concat
This cause problem when i have in WireMock endpoint configured with prefix
Because then proxy url is concat with that prefix
but actually it is not needed there (as server to which i want proxy request don't have this prefix, that prefix is my abstraction)
i use this prefix to split configuration and logic of mock on two configuration
but when proxy, they both should go to the same server
is there any possibility to workaround this?
@darthkurak Your question looks a bit like this one: WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net#459
And if I understand you correct:
- You configure WireMock.Net to match all requests with a prefix, so https://localhost:9090/prefix
- You add a WithProxy("http://google.com/abc")
- You call do a call from your client application to "https://localhost:9090/prefix" and and WireMock.Net tries to connect to https://google.com/prefix/abc ?
Correct?
Or else, create an issue at the GitHub project page and provide a full working example project.
Does this apply to WireMock.Net as well? http://wiremock.org/docs/extending-wiremock/
@ntpincus You can use response templating using Handlebars.Net
https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Response-Templating
However, your example from summing up to parameters does not work because the values are interpreted as a string, and not as an int.
@ntpincus Actually it does work.
server
.Given(Request.Create().WithPath("/trans").UsingGet())
.WithGuid("90356dba-b36c-469a-a17e-669cd84f1f05")
.RespondWith(Response.Create()
.WithStatusCode(200)
.WithHeader("Content-Type", "application/json")
.WithHeader("Transformed-Postman-Token", "token is {{request.headers.Postman-Token}}")
.WithHeader("xyz_{{request.headers.Postman-Token}}", "token is {{request.headers.Postman-Token}}")
.WithBody(@"{""msg"": ""Hello world CATCH-ALL on /*, {{request.path}}, add={{Math.Add request.query.start.[0] 42}} bykey={{request.query.start}}, bykey={{request.query.stop}}, byidx0={{request.query.stop.[0]}}, byidx1={{request.query.stop.[1]}}"" }")
.WithTransformer()
.WithDelay(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(100))
);Call it with: http://localhost:9091/trans?start=1000&stop=1&stop=2
Hi @StefH , I have a follow-up question to @ntpincus 's qusetion. It seems like you are able to call the math handlebar helper function math.add. I am trying to create a custom handlebar helper function but am having trouble. Ideally this helper would take in request.body as a parameter and branch based on its value. This is what I have so far for the helper, but arguments[0] doesn't seem to be how I get the first argument to the helper. Could you help?
And this is how I'm calling the function:
The arguments is an array of objects.
For Handlebars.Net, you need some workaround to get the real value: See https://github.com/StefH/Handlebars.Net.Helpers/blob/master/src/Handlebars.Net.Helpers/Parsers/ArgumentsParser.cs
Great, thanks for pointing me in the right direction! I think I have one last question for this issue. It looks like my custom handlebar helper isn't being registered properly. I get the following error when I run my code: "Template references a helper that is not registered. Could not find helper 'ImageIdRequestFunction'". I show how I register it in the first image.png I sent in the last post. Namely, that I'm calling Handlebars.Create() and then Handlebars.RegisterHelper("ImageIdRequestFunction"). Could you show me how to properly register a custom handlebars helper function? Thanks again.
@pjsimmon
You should use HandlebarsRegistrationCallback to register your own.
See https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/blob/4c68a98bf899eed448ed76d2a8b7983e16bfebbf/examples/WireMock.Net.Console.Net452.Classic/MainApp.cs#L62
You should use HandlebarsRegistrationCallback to register your own.
See https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/blob/4c68a98bf899eed448ed76d2a8b7983e16bfebbf/examples/WireMock.Net.Console.Net452.Classic/MainApp.cs#L62
Thanks @StefH , that worked for me. I'm also wondering if it is possible to set the response status code based on information in the request body? Right now I am able to use a custom handlebars helper to dynamically create the response body, but would also like to dynamically update the response status code as well.
@pjsimmon This is possible. See unit test : https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/blob/master/test/WireMock.Net.Tests/ResponseBuilders/ResponseWithHandlebarsTests.cs#L129
@sonthanh Can you please provide an example what you try to achieve?
Hi, We have one of the use case for contract testing in which mappings are generated by Spring Cloud Contract based on wiremock.org but there are some difference in the definition of mappings in wiremock.net and wiremock (java). Is there any way we can use those wiremock(java) mappings for wiremock.net?
Hello everyone, is it possible to use the ProxyAndRecord functionality with a custom path for the saved files? For example if i wanted to save the recordings in
myFolder/otherFolder instead of __admin/mappings is this possible through some configuration or do i have to implement a custom file handler?
@acanha This is currently only possible using a custom file handler.
See https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/blob/395be3c5832bae26a187994c7913e6d200677ebd/examples/WireMock.Net.Console.Net452.Classic/CustomFileSystemFileHandler.cs#L7
However, adding this as a config-setting does also make sense. I'll take a look.
Hey guys, having a weird issue here, I'm pretty sure this isn't related to wiremock, but hopefully some of you has already bumped into this issue.... I'm playing around with wiremock.net for some integration tests. I can run them locally without any issues. However, they all seem to fail (clients all abort with HTTP 500) when running on CI server (appveyor).
And this works fine:
var s = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
var r = s.FromJson<IssueResponse>();
And my error sounds familiar but no idea how to fix it
System.Net.Http.UnsupportedMediaTypeException : No MediaTypeFormatter is available to read an object of type 'IssueResponse' from content with media type 'aplication/json'
Hey, everyone :) I encountered a problem and thought I'd ask for some help here :) I'm trying to start the server and redirect all traffic from
mobile app <=> backend to mobile app <=> wiremock server - but Im wondering if thats possible without changing the code of the app. I know that's possible with changing the codebase, from targeting my BE endpoints to target localhost (for iOS), but I'm wondering if thats doable somehow without changing the targeted endpoint in the codebase (for example with some proxy + wiremock settings). Unfortunately it's not possible to change the codebase, so I need to take it more like a blackbox. Any help? :) (also worth noting I'm running on a iOS simulator)
@stackustack_gitlab If you have control over your (test) environment, you could just update the hostfile so that the mobile app still connects to http://backend.com but backend.com resolves to the WireMock.Net ip-address.
I'm following this https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Using-HTTPS-%28SSL%29 to add cert but still get an error. Unfortunately I have to use https.
