Discuss improvements to the internet draft for application/json+links
The "links" object in a JSON object. The object contains JSON names which each uniquely define the underlying resource. hmm... does the name define the resource, or the relationship ?
also, what do you think about explicitly calling out a case where you would have an array of links ?
Looking at other hypermedia linking RFC the array case seems to be quite controversial @igrom :)
there is a some implicit ambiguity in the world between trying to come up with Content-Types, Hypemedia, and Link Relations. perhaps we have explicitly state their meaning and expectations via definitions and then use that consistently
I was definitely having trouble keeping the wording right
if you look at the JSON rfc, you would be surprised what to actually call these "things".